Topic: why some ico failed - page 2. (Read 2690 times)
A great deal of variables why ico fizzled. Initially is the undertaking is definitely not a decent venture, I mean they offer or make something however there is something uncommon with their item, second is tirelessness is critical and the vast majority of them dont it with their heart. Furthermore, the last they advance with the wrong path and there is no long haul design, so financial specialists dont need to contribute on the ico.
This is because most often the developers simply do not know how to attract investors and think that without professional promotion they will be able to cope
There are many reasons for failure. For example, there is no community in this project that no one wants to publicize and maintain the coin, or the coin has no clear plan for future development or its technology is useless.
There are 3 main reasons to fail your ICO - scam project, not enough professional team (uncapability to realize your ideas) and when the project can not collect the soft cap (often due to bad marketing or not enough money for the pr campaigns).
The people that are behind the development of the project are lack of information, knowledge and skills to work on the the crypto community. The project should have a experienced individuals that could surely help to promote the project and become a competitive project in the world of cryptos.
have being studying some ico this year they are failing , what are the causes of there failure
Because they dont have a solid product to sustain with at the first place. That's why it is so hard to determine which iCO will last or not.
probably because they do not fully understand it, trying to make new things by making ICO re-born possible, and thinking that it will work and make it successful, and after they try it then know that is not as easy as they imagine, I think that's the way it is.
have being studying some ico this year they are failing , what are the causes of there failure
Because there are so many different ICO projects that lead to dilution, we do not know which ICO to choose.
This also led some people to rely on it to scam investors.
Actually, there are some reasons for that. The main thing is the project output. The project output should directly impact our day to day life. Then only create a demand that unique coin in the future. So if it isn't like that project peoples are not willing to invest in that kind of projects.
yes, I also see a lot of ico that may fail it because the concept offered less promising investors or maybe because the current market is decreasing so investors prefer to keep their money
have being studying some ico this year they are failing , what are the causes of there failure
Many ICOs simply copy other people's ideas and do not have MVP. Investors are no longer interested in investing their money in such crappy projects.
It seems to me that every year only a growing number of bad projects, even very many projects that have collected 50 million disappear
I think the reason why some ICOs are failing because they do not have good and promising project to everybody that is why there are no investors who would like to join.
have being studying some ico this year they are failing , what are the causes of there failure
Many ICOs simply copy other people's ideas and do not have MVP. Investors are no longer interested in investing their money in such crappy projects.
Personally, I believe the reason why some ico fail is because they were not well developed and the do not have good team to support or market the project and this leads to the failure, some also fail because they do not have good whitepaper, roadmap, manager and even community and some do not have products because people believe it is better to invest in a project where you can see the product unlike some that are based on assumption.
The failure of the ICO that I often encounter is that they lost the investor and developer team does not run in accordance with the roadmap. And an awful lot of ICO is now new and more promising for investors, of course, they will try with the ICO. And if they have a good team and have a very good potential in the market will continue to survive for a long time.
A promising product, a competent team, the right marketing, - at the very least, these conditions must be followed by a good ICO. Next, we need a correctly drawn up plan at the right time, a good approach to investors and many other small things that can influence the progress of the project.
The main reason of this some were lack of communication and not haveba creadible write ups to prove how they can do their so called ico. Many of them is only created for moneygrab, that indicates a not good ico to invest in and many more reasons. If ever anyone wants to invest research first.
one of the important factors ico project is marketing, how the team manage their marketing well. the concept of project and team must also be clear, if all I think there will be no failure, but it all depends on investor interest in the ico project.
There are many probable reason why ico have failed, the one that I am familiar with is that, their ico lacks of investors causing their token sale to didn't reach its softcap, resulting for project to discontinue. Some ico also have reach its hardcap and has a success in sale, but when it turns to exchange, the price of their tokens are useless because many investors didn't see the point of function to that token, causing the token price to dump and soon to be delisted in the exchange.
Jump to: