Bounty hunting is one of a way to earn cryptocurrency and it is a good way of earning tokens without capital for investments. I think bounty hunters shouldn't be blame when the token price simultaneously decreases after it is listed. Besides the total allocation given to those bounty hunters are only a minimal supply compared to the total supply of the token.
There are no bounty hunters to blame for the project. Only bullshit projects that blame bounty hunters, they say that it was the bounty hunter that caused the price to collapse and the project to fall down many times. That really is bullshit 
Topic: WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS? (Read 1185 times)
The fact that cryptocurrencies are not regulated amount to all sort of projects flooding the market 90% of these project failed without future strategic development by the team in the past years a lot of these projects produces shitcoins why blame hunters? who had done their jobs by promoting those projects some of these hunters might have a mindset of hodling their coins but lack of proper development of the project especially when listed an exchange that had fake volume thus prompted most of them to dump their coin for a token than having a worthless coin myetherwallet is filled with these coins if I had the opportunity of dumping then I would had done so likewise.
Bounty hunters aren't responsible for projects utilities, features and ideas, it doesn't make any sense to blame those who aren't even responsible for the foundation of something, the perfect of a project lies in the hand of the team, team are to be blame if anything went wrong
The point of blaming is that when a bad thing happens, people need someone to take responsibility for it. Therefore, bounty projects usually use bounty hunters as a bullet shield. However, I think everyone in this cryptocurrency world smart enough to know that it's not bounty hunters' fault. The project failed is because of its own plans and developments. However, they are not brave enough to admit that.
Their problem is their lack of developments and strategies. eveytime they about to fall, bounty hunters often sold their tokens even at the lower price and this might be one of the reason why are they mad on bounty hunters. Because the bounty hunters had add some problems to their problem. which is hard to resist after they already distributed their rewards. If they knew something like that would happened they won't gonna distribute any rewards sooner but the damage has been done and there's nothing they can do about it anymore.
I don't really see the point on blaming because it wouldn't change a thing about the price of the shitcoins that they have invested in it is useless.
This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
The point of blaming is that when a bad thing happens, people need someone to take responsibility for it. Therefore, bounty projects usually use bounty hunters as a bullet shield. However, I think everyone in this cryptocurrency world smart enough to know that it's not bounty hunters' fault. The project failed is because of its own plans and developments. However, they are not brave enough to admit that. This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
I don't really see the point on blaming because it wouldn't change a thing about the price of the shitcoins that they have invested in it is useless.
This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
The point of blaming is that when a bad thing happens, people need someone to take responsibility for it. Therefore, bounty projects usually use bounty hunters as a bullet shield. However, I think everyone in this cryptocurrency world smart enough to know that it's not bounty hunters' fault. The project failed is because of its own plans and developments. However, they are not brave enough to admit that. This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
I don't really see the point on blaming because it wouldn't change a thing about the price of the shitcoins that they have invested in it is useless.
This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
This has been around for so long now I also don't think that it was like this when the bounties are paying good back then they only started to blame the hunters when the things have gone so bad.
Back then I like to think that hunters help the investors by promoting a good project and helping them get profit now they are only being blame for the shitcoins that is circulating around the market.
I also saw that, from what I experienced as an investor and bounty hunter. That is why the bounty hunter is blamed, the reason is that the bounty hunter is considered to damage the coin market by selling when the bounty hunter gets a coin. In my opinion personally this is not true because bounty hunters only get a small portion of the total coin allocation. Besides coins that become shitcoin is the fault of the developers themselves, if there is good management and can attract user support then their coins will not become shitcoin.
Even though investors are the most holding tokens that they bought during sale period, So I think investors who caused the token prices plummet. Bounty hunters only get a few percent of the total allocation, so even if they sell all tokens, the dump won't happen. In fact, there are also many Bounty hunters who not sell their tokens, they keep holding until become shitcoin in their wallet. 
I also saw that, from what I experienced as an investor and bounty hunter. That is why the bounty hunter is blamed, the reason is that the bounty hunter is considered to damage the coin market by selling when the bounty hunter gets a coin. In my opinion personally this is not true because bounty hunters only get a small portion of the total coin allocation. Besides coins that become shitcoin is the fault of the developers themselves, if there is good management and can attract user support then their coins will not become shitcoin.
Yeah, it's so true! They blame bounty hunters for immediately sell the tokens when they get paid. However, it's just ridiculous. Bounty hunters have the right to decide whether to keep or to sell their coins. Furthermore, the tokens allocated to bounty hunters are really small compared to the total token released. Selling those campaign tokens doesn't affect the project that much. On the other hand, the project is failed because of the project itself! 
I also saw that, from what I experienced as an investor and bounty hunter. That is why the bounty hunter is blamed, the reason is that the bounty hunter is considered to damage the coin market by selling when the bounty hunter gets a coin. In my opinion personally this is not true because bounty hunters only get a small portion of the total coin allocation. Besides coins that become shitcoin is the fault of the developers themselves, if there is good management and can attract user support then their coins will not become shitcoin.
By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
These developers want a scapegoat for the failure of their platform, and this is unacceptable because bounty hunters are just messaging carriers, all lie on the platform, and the product if it failed to attract investors all the blames are on the projects, bounty hunters have nothing to do with it.
They use scapegoat because they don't wanna pay good rewards and also to fool their investors.
They want to look like they failed because of the bounty hunters but the truth is?they only wanted to fly away with good image.
Fooling people is their best weapon and same reason why they always get away and make another scam sooner.
By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
These developers want a scapegoat for the failure of their platform, and this is unacceptable because bounty hunters are just messaging carriers, all lie on the platform, and the product if it failed to attract investors all the blames are on the projects, bounty hunters have nothing to do with it.
Too sad to see that both parties are blaming each other, bounty participants, and the devs but the end of the day, they are all failed and the project itself. A shame to those who come saying they are right and you are wrong. A project won't succeed without market exposure and that is how bounty hunters taking part in it but it never been appreciated.
If they all are blaming each other, there is no reason for them to grow, less success with their part. This will only turn into shit project.
If they all are blaming each other, there is no reason for them to grow, less success with their part. This will only turn into shit project.
This has been on ongoing blaming game of investors to the bounty hunters since the time of the great bounties 4 years ago. A very small amount of the projects token or coin is allotted for paying the bounty hunters so in my opinion even if they dump the said tokens to some exchange that is used for the project, then in my opinion, it should not affect the price of the cryptocurrency in any way because the amounts being traded is very small. Many factors would contribute to the project being unsuccessful and those major ones are the likely reason why they fail.
They blame the hunters because they don't want to face the reality and they would look for someone or something to blame on their lost.
They don't want to face the reality that they lose because they didn't take time to search any information about the project that they would invest in.
So they would make some reason and blame it to the hunters even if the hunters doesn't have anything to do with their shitcoins.
They just couldn't understand the fact that the hunters only have small portion of the whole supply and the hunters couldn't really destroy the price.
The hunters also lost in those shitcoin so we shouldn't really blame them if you are looking for someone to blame then blame the developers of those shitcoin for not doing their job properly or the team of those shit coin.
There are so many low valued crypto out there but they are doing everything they could to survive and there are some who abandoned their project so why blame the hunters when it was all the team's fault?
They don't want to face the reality that they lose because they didn't take time to search any information about the project that they would invest in.
So they would make some reason and blame it to the hunters even if the hunters doesn't have anything to do with their shitcoins.
They just couldn't understand the fact that the hunters only have small portion of the whole supply and the hunters couldn't really destroy the price.
The hunters also lost in those shitcoin so we shouldn't really blame them if you are looking for someone to blame then blame the developers of those shitcoin for not doing their job properly or the team of those shit coin.
There are so many low valued crypto out there but they are doing everything they could to survive and there are some who abandoned their project so why blame the hunters when it was all the team's fault?
Bounty hunter mostly trade theyr shitcoins for good altcoins and Bitcoin, and they not have enought to fall a project a part.
I don't blame bounty hunters for promoting projects that fail later. Anyone can work on something thinking it's a good deal, but in fact you see later you were deceived and it was a mistake. I just blame hunters for accepting such low working standards without any legitimacy guarantee.
I mean: why do hunters accept to promote something to be paid in a currency they even don't know if it will have a value? A project ran without real money is very questionable... Developers pay worthless coins and hope for the best (as nothing was invested, any profit is fine for them), and if no profit is made it's also ok, as nothing was invested!
But hunters still lose their time and effort promoting these coins, while they should be demanding better working conditions and rejecting these bad offers.
That is why they should be blamed for in my opinion.
I mean: why do hunters accept to promote something to be paid in a currency they even don't know if it will have a value? A project ran without real money is very questionable... Developers pay worthless coins and hope for the best (as nothing was invested, any profit is fine for them), and if no profit is made it's also ok, as nothing was invested!
But hunters still lose their time and effort promoting these coins, while they should be demanding better working conditions and rejecting these bad offers.
That is why they should be blamed for in my opinion.
Each time i hear people say hunters are the ones dumping prices of token i laugh , Dogdata and the rest have not distributed bounty reward until now but the price of their token is already about 80% below listing price the last time i checked. now in that case who will you blame it on if not investors and team?
Bounty hunters are seen as beggars by investors because bounty hunters only receive it for free and don't spend money in the form of money like investors do. so it's only natural that they blame bounty hunters as dumpers. however, investors do not realize that the allocation of tokens to bounty campaigns is only 1% - 5% of the total 100% launched. so if they realize that they will not blame bounty hunters as dumpers. I hope investors can open their eyes wider in this matter.
Bounty allocation 1-5 percent is much higher than 0.05-0.1 percent Bounty allocation. I don't see any running bounty whose bounty budget is more than 0.1 percent. Simple calculation can solve the matter, 0.1 percent can't dump the whole market. Bounty hunters are getting paid after the price drops, the most bounty rewards are in hold. Even though the price is continuously dumped below IEO. 
Bounty hunters are seen as beggars by investors because bounty hunters only receive it for free and don't spend money in the form of money like investors do. so it's only natural that they blame bounty hunters as dumpers. however, investors do not realize that the allocation of tokens to bounty campaigns is only 1% - 5% of the total 100% launched. so if they realize that they will not blame bounty hunters as dumpers. I hope investors can open their eyes wider in this matter.
There are things that need to be straightened out, actually bounty hunters don't get tokens or coins for free. There are tasks that must be done according to the rules. Simply put, bounty hunters must "work" first before getting a "salary". If there are still those who consider bounty hunters to get tokens or coins for free, that's a big mistake. Moreover, the allocation is relatively small, as you mentioned. If the project is strong and attracts market attention, surely it will not be easy to shake when bounty hunters sell their "rights". There are many projects that are able to maintain prices even though the bounty hunter is selling together. Jump to: