Topic: WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS? - page 8. (Read 1187 times)
Usually the bounty allocation is only small and it will not have a big impact on falling prices when the open market, maybe because investors see most bounty hunters sell directly when the list is exchanged and I also do not agree if the price is dumped because the bounty hunter sells tokens. It all depends on the existing demand in the market, so if there is a lot of demand and there are also lots that sell, I don't think there will be a problem.
Shitcoins are been given birth to by shit developers, shitcoins will always be shitcoin either bounty Hunters dump or not, I don't see how this is bounty hunters fault
Devs created those shitcoins and seek for bounty hunters to create awareness for their shitcoins, they know what will happen in the end right from the beginning, it's more like a game to them so who are to be blame if not the developers themselves?
Yes, the mistake really lies with shitcoin developers, because they have tried to build fake projects with a very charming case, so many people will like the project in the beginning, even though it is a game from the developer so that they can benefit through investor money. 
Because honestly that is the simplest way to blame anyone with absolutely no power? When you blame the rich people you can't do anything to them, they are already wealthy and creators of that shitcoin and made millions of dollars and they got away with it, they don't care about you and you can't do anything to them anymore, they can simply ignore you. Even bounty managers are fine because they are loved by these big companies for the moral flexibility they have anyway, they are the spokesperson for the bad business'.
However, you can blame bounty hunters because they are small timers and you can simply put a neg trust on them unfairly and get away with it. Some people like to power trip like that and unfortunately their power trip only works on powerless.
However, you can blame bounty hunters because they are small timers and you can simply put a neg trust on them unfairly and get away with it. Some people like to power trip like that and unfortunately their power trip only works on powerless.
I think bounty Hunter is not to blame, even most bounty hunters are victims for now, there are many who are not paid after working for several months, some are paid but altcoin has never been listed on the exchange.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
No reason? Bounty hunters are the main source of the advertisement for the project to go across the world so I think bounty hunters have a sin on its own. But let's not call all bounty hunters, only those bounty hunters who shamelessly shitpost everywhere, those who promote in an absurd way, and those who doesn't even do a little google of the project. Even a single glance of the campaign manager would mean a lot.
I don't think all bounty hunters do that smart hunters always do research on the project so they will know the real project and not become a fraud at the end after the bounty ends, most promoting unreasonably is done mostly by newbie accounts so the project was spread out everywhere because of their own actions even though the project failed if it was done by themselves.
Devs created those shitcoins and seek for bounty hunters to create awareness for their shitcoins, they know what will happen in the end right from the beginning, it's more like a game to them so who are to be blame if not the developers themselves?
Bounty hunters are to blame for supporting and actively promoting shitcoins. If I create a ponzi scheme and you support and promote it, you can't blame me for it. You have been part of it too and you have to accept it.Before joining a bounty campaign, first of all do a bit of research about the project you're going to support. By joining these bounties and actively promoting them, you're only helping new scams propagate in the community. If it works, why would they stop creating new scams? The more shitcoin bounties will be supported, the higher the incentive is to create new ones.
Devs created those shitcoins and seek for bounty hunters to create awareness for their shitcoins, they know what will happen in the end right from the beginning, it's more like a game to them so who are to be blame if not the developers themselves?
I think bounty Hunter is not to blame, even most bounty hunters are victims for now, there are many who are not paid after working for several months, some are paid but altcoin has never been listed on the exchange.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
No reason? Bounty hunters are the main source of the advertisement for the project to go across the world so I think bounty hunters have a sin on its own. But let's not call all bounty hunters, only those bounty hunters who shamelessly shitpost everywhere, those who promote in an absurd way, and those who doesn't even do a little google of the project. Even a single glance of the campaign manager would mean a lot.
I barely understand what you are saying because your English is broken. Saying investors is at fault too is correct. Let's just say that bounty hunters and investors alike are at fault because bounty hunters are the ones who is advertising a scam project and the investors made the choice to purchase some. Still, saying bounty hunters are blameless is just wrong because I could say the same thing too just like you did.
Quote
Bounty hunters have a choice to advertise a project. They can research or rely on the others and investing their time to advertise it then failing at the end is their lost. See? investors and bounty hunters are the same. It's not like bounty hunters are being force to advertise a project. They have the ability to review it. Investors is just investing, it's their thing while bounty hunters are advertising because it's their thing. Much like bounty hunters see projects from campaign managers, investors see projects from bounty hunters.
The thing here is that, we all makes mistakes. No one will actually know if a project will scam or not, we can only make predictions and analysis by researching while waiting for the truth.
Bounty hunters also need to take some blame for the proliferance of shitcoins. Because they are the ones who promote these scam projects. Many ordinary users will invest in these shitty projects, as a result of the promotion by these bounty hunters. And in rare cases, I have seen bounty hunters promoting shitcoins even after knowing that they are outright scams.
You have to understand where the investors who pay actual money come from this argument, after all they invest real.money into the project and when they see the price go down they believe that it is because of bounty hunters dump the coin at whatever profit they get as soon as the coin is listed. Not saying that's true but that's their argument.
I think bounty Hunter is not to blame, even most bounty hunters are victims for now, there are many who are not paid after working for several months, some are paid but altcoin has never been listed on the exchange.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
Well I am considered a partial bounty hunter if you want to see it like that, since I am on a signature campaign,,, but even I admit that looking around myself, when I was promoting different projects, almost everyone else did not like or support the project like I did. I tried to use the product, but most others promoting it had zero clue about the product so they ended up shilling and giving us a bad name. So I do blame them 90%.
It's not always or never the fault of bounty hunters, if a project failed or died because bounty hunters dumped 0.1% of the token max supply then the project is a very bad one, some projects are managed by bad team is all
The team also dumped coin and we cant blame the bounty hunter for dumping coin. There are also few project that succeded even after the bounty hunters dumped in first place. If the management good it can prevent this issue.
I never saw anyone blaming bounty hunters for scam projects, as far as I know bounty project depends on the investors and the market cap should be achieved but still there are lot of scammed bounty projects who never the bounty Hunters once after the work is done. They just promote their project to get paid but unfortunately they will be cheated at the end of the day.
There are few projects that become successful till date and their bounty campaign never dragged them down, I don't believe that, new projects are very used to not giving out promised rewards to bounty hunters once they don't meet hardcap, hunters only get paid for their work
I think bounty Hunter is not to blame, even most bounty hunters are victims for now, there are many who are not paid after working for several months, some are paid but altcoin has never been listed on the exchange.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
so there is no reason for Bounty Hunter to be blamed.
No reason? Bounty hunters are the main source of the advertisement for the project to go across the world so I think bounty hunters have a sin on its own. But let's not call all bounty hunters, only those bounty hunters who shamelessly shitpost everywhere, those who promote in an absurd way, and those who doesn't even do a little google of the project. Even a single glance of the campaign manager would mean a lot.
it has become a common thing because sometimes when coins for bounty hunters are distributed, prices sometimes dump so far. however, if we pay attention, actually the team just doesn't make a wall to hold the decline from happening. other than that, price increases can also occur when teams do a strategy, yeah, but since this has become a habit, so this is general think
Any project who blames bounty hunters are scam projects, they had a budget and carried out a feasibility study on how the bounty payment won't affect their market, and they equally have a soft-hardcap. If after all these, they still fail and blame the hunters, they are a scam themselves, otherwise, they should have paid in a stable coin other than their native coin. As a hunter, I sometimes invest in a very interesting project.
Most of the time bounty hunters are blamed because the price gets dumped which sometimes leads to a coin having a price almost a nickel. However, people should realize that the majority of the tokens are on the investors and the team itself and only a small portion is distributed in the bounty. 2℅-5% of the total supply won't hurt the market price that much if you will think of it. The reason why an altcoin becomes a shit coin is because of the competence of the team, not being able to develop and promote a project, and also investors aiming to just earn from it.
Everyone should be blamed for their investment choices not a given group of individuals. If a project is being promoted, its not being forced on anyone to invest in. Bounty hunter do promotions to get paid for their services which is not in anyway reasonable for them to be jugded.
Jump to: