Bounty hunters do not provide value
They do not get the message out to communities that actually purchase the token - and once they receive the tokens they sell it straight away
If you think they do hurt the price you are stupid - learn about market makers - market making capital
Also those saying volume on an exchange is important - every exchange allows wash trading - i mean look at bilaxy - an exchange with hardly any traffic yet is top 5 of volume - 5% of IBM doesn't trade per day but its ok for 50/60% of a shit coin to trade a day ?
Start researching in this space and stop trying to get something for nothing
Topic: WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS? - page 5. (Read 1185 times)
Such a perception arises because bounty hunters are considered to get tokens or coins for free so that they are easily thrown away without thinking about price developments. In fact, bounty hunters also provide support with hard work, time, energy, it is also another form of investment other than money, meaning that bounty hunters "work" to get rewards. We should understand and understand each other, not blame each other, no one can really control market acceptance, it all depends on many factors and the quality of the project itself. Let's support each other and stay motivated.
Some time bounty hunter only allow what recommended by bounty campaign manager, after seeing who is the bounty manager they will allow and joined the bounty campaign without checking first, they have know with bounty manager review about his bounty management before update.
This is a strategy being used by many of the bounty hunters. But I would say that it gives no protection against low quality projects. A good bounty manager may make sure that the bounty hunter receives his tokens. But at the same time, these tokens will be useless if the project is not performing well and if the development timelines are not being honored.
If project management is smart and tokens allocation thought out bounty hunters can`t be harmful for project. Another thing when project was created because of hype or money deserve and token distribution is insane, then it`s shit anyway. So blame is always on project creators, bounty hunters just work for them and their product
Some time bounty hunter only allow what recommended by bounty campaign manager, after seeing who is the bounty manager they will allow and joined the bounty campaign without checking first, they have know with bounty manager review about his bounty management before update.
right and I used to often like this and mostly had bad luck but I don't blame the manager because I think there are many factors why the project he chose failed even if he chose the wrong project, and for now I try my best from the results of doing a little checking before joining a campaign .
Some time bounty hunter only allow what recommended by bounty campaign manager, after seeing who is the bounty manager they will allow and joined the bounty campaign without checking first, they have know with bounty manager review about his bounty management before update.
I don't see any reason that the bounty hunters will be blamed after the coin will become shitcoin. We can't deny the fact that the bounty hunters are also dumpers or price but it doesn't mean we should blame all those things. There is the whole team of the project might have an idea of buyback after it will be dumped. So, dont blame bounty hunters because they are the ones who helps to promote the project.
same reason. all projects need a promotion team. when they can bring the project to the surface, it will be a worthy gift. but if the project cannot foster something that is expected investors, in the end it will be the same, they will become shitcoin.So the point is, mistakes don't only happen to bounty hunters !!
From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
I don't think the bounty hunters are being blamed are the shity bounties or token, At least I don't encounter this at all. We all know that the developer of the token itself is the own to blamed in their problem so I guess it is clear to everybody also most likely in a bounty campaign the bounty manager are getting the blamed since a lot of bounty hunters are blaming the managers for having a slow progress for rewarding every participants in the bounty.When token about the market price of the token probably the price is still depending in the supply and demand of the surely the reward of the bounty hunters are going to affect it but it was not the bounty hunters fault if the token doesn't have demand.
Let them say, people always look ways to turn things on others, here are few things that kills new projects
1. Low exchanges with no volume
2. Bad real use cases
3. Team aims to steal from investors and exit scam
How is any of these have anything to do with bounty hunters? New projects seeks for bounty hunters to create awareness for their project,why blaming us ?
Some people will always accuse the hunters whatever the fact that has already happened. They have no clue and they are always thinking if the dump will always be made caused by the hunters. 1. Low exchanges with no volume
2. Bad real use cases
3. Team aims to steal from investors and exit scam
How is any of these have anything to do with bounty hunters? New projects seeks for bounty hunters to create awareness for their project,why blaming us ?
They are not yet opening their mind if there was a lot of possibilities. Those people even the developers were always blaming the hunters.
Now there are many bounty projects to avoid dumper so the distribution is done in 3 phases and every phase is done once a month.
New projects will always find something to put blames on, and the easiest escape is blaming bounty hunters for dumping, thy expect bounty hunters to hold the tokens? The fact is some new projects even dump first before bounty hunters
Let them say, people always look ways to turn things on others, here are few things that kills new projects
1. Low exchanges with no volume
2. Bad real use cases
3. Team aims to steal from investors and exit scam
How is any of these have anything to do with bounty hunters? New projects seeks for bounty hunters to create awareness for their project,why blaming us ?
Some people will always accuse the hunters whatever the fact that has already happened. They have no clue and they are always thinking if the dump will always be made caused by the hunters. 1. Low exchanges with no volume
2. Bad real use cases
3. Team aims to steal from investors and exit scam
How is any of these have anything to do with bounty hunters? New projects seeks for bounty hunters to create awareness for their project,why blaming us ?
They are not yet opening their mind if there was a lot of possibilities. Those people even the developers were always blaming the hunters.
I don't hold tokens from bounties, they hardly become successful and while holding you can help up with nothing but worthless tokens in the end, most new projects can not be trusted, all they do is give out promises that they will never make come true
Yes bounty hunters not be blamed if the project is shite and no plans of future developments, just running an ICO with their 1st 2nd and third phase of roadmap, after that gone.
There are many bounty hunters i know that are actually supporting what they are campaigning. So if the project is shite their efforts wasted.
There are many bounty hunters i know that are actually supporting what they are campaigning. So if the project is shite their efforts wasted.
From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
That's one of the things that normally happen and the best thing to do is to ignore them. And also people who say such things lacks knowledge about the crypto space. After a successful bounty campaign, most projects takes months to pay, and when they do the price have gone down, the question is, who are those that dumped the price prior to that of bounty? None will ask the question, but once bounty is sent they find excuses to tag on bounty hunters knowing fully well that bounty allocation is always small and was sent late. So, I see those who make such comments as people who lacks knowledge of how the crypto space works, rather they should ask the team and investors how the token price went too low.
right, I also respect the bounty hunters, as I know they cooperate the project to grow, Usually because of the angle is not the same if you are an investor and it accelerates, there's no one else to blame barring yourself, no matter the hunters before you proceed you need to do some gatherings to make more valuable to the crypto world.
We all know on what the bounty hunters do right ? Are to promote the project we participated and spread in these forum or in any social media so that many people can see on what kind of project it it. But sometime the rewards receive from the bounty are holding it for so long cause of these low of price and then they tell become a shitcoins because of the bounty hunters.The developer is a party who will always try to take all of the orders from the market.
It is a bullshit reason to hide the weaknesses of developers. Bounty hunters cannot make the project collapsed because bounty execution budgets are often very low, which is not enough to affect the price of the token.
Bounty hunters have lost some respects in crypto space already and that respect is never going to be returned, some bounty projects now even ignore Jr members and members from signature campaigns because of this, bounty hunters need to unite to stop all these nonsense, they are just using us
Jr.member is a low ranking and therefore many projects that want to be promoted from members to the top so it is more useful to be promoted but there are some projects also with a signature campaign available for jr.member but that is only part of it.
Nonsense projects are many as long as we can respond well and choose projects with what you get it.
And as a bounty hunter also Ill think blaming for the shitcoins its not my intentions. The one thing could do that maybe those who want to buy a altcoins in a small price until it come to a shitcoins.
This is a very good question, why? Many bounty hunters hold tokens even more than investors, some Dev don't even distribute token until the Dev and investors are done dumping and before they distribute, the token have already become shitty or even delisted from exchange. Some Dev even lock tokens to avoid hunters from dumping, so if token become shitty, how is that the hunters doing? This is really a good topic, Dev should take there minds off blaming hunters for there failed projects.
From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
Bounty hunters is earning free token by their low work as what believe investors and projects CEO do blame for hunters. Bcnex exchange didn't give all rewards to hunters but now looks scam. I would like to blame to project team neither hunters or investor, make a project scam by release unlimited token in few times.
Everyone is guilty of dumping investors as well as bounty hunters. Just as you rightly stated everyone looks for a return n on their holdings. Why the blame falls on hunters is because everyone here considers themselves as rich and the hunters are people from third world countries.
Jump to: