Topic: WHY THE BLAME ON BOUNTY HUNTERS FOR SHITCOINS? - page 11. (Read 1187 times)
People have different perspective. As you can see, some investors have this mindset cause they experience it with the past. Cant blame them for it since some hunter are actually dumping their tokens right after getting rewards. But thats different case for those who hold so meaning we cant really comprehend which is which here cause both parties have a point when regards to this matter.
I don't see any reason that the bounty hunters will be blamed after the coin will become shitcoin. We can't deny the fact that the bounty hunters are also dumpers or price but it doesn't mean we should blame all those things. There is the whole team of the project might have an idea of buyback after it will be dumped. So, dont blame bounty hunters because they are the ones who helps to promote the project.
From observation, most people who are bounty hunters are also investors themselves. In any case, the two groups almost have the same interest and that is to maximize profit on their token holdings. It is just two sides of one coin issue. It all depends on the individual involved because we have bounty hunters who hold coins longer than those who invested with their funds. It is about time people act fair in their comments towards bounty hunters anytime a coin becomes a shit coin. By the way even in recent times, bounty hunting is not as attractive as it used to be, but still people are always quick to put blame on bounty hunters after a failed project meanwhile the tokens received bounty are very meagre to kill a project.
Jump to: