I hope you understand the author of article does not care about women in Blockchain at all. That person cares about power and submission.
Women in power? Men in submission?
Topic: Why We Need Women In Blockchain - page 4. (Read 15186 times)
I hope you understand the author of article does not care about women in Blockchain at all. That person cares about power and submission.
Women in power? Men in submission?
We need ALL women in the blockchain. Why? Women are practical. They'd figure out a way to make Bitcoin zoom to the moon. (And then it would be out of our reach until Musk...)
Women aren't practical. They're materialistic . But even though they are, they are the kinds of people that will not lead themselves into trading with a lot of loss, gambling with a lot of loss and etc. They are playing safe in crypto. Materialistic? Must be that scientists aren't practical either. After all, they are so materialistic that they don't even suspect that people have souls and spirits, practical or not.
Some women have a lot of spirit. We need them to move the blockchain.
I hope you understand the author of article does not care about women in Blockchain at all. That person cares about power and submission.
We need ALL women in the blockchain. Why? Women are practical. They'd figure out a way to make Bitcoin zoom to the moon. (And then it would be out of our reach until Musk...)
Women aren't practical. They're materialistic . But even though they are, they are the kinds of people that will not lead themselves into trading with a lot of loss, gambling with a lot of loss and etc. They are playing safe in crypto.
We need ALL women in the blockchain. Why? Women are practical. They'd figure out a way to make Bitcoin zoom to the moon. (And then it would be out of our reach until Musk...)
There is no female on this list of crypto millionaires:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-millionaires-5134439
some girl should start to change this..
Elizabeth White made it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-millionaires-5134439
some girl should start to change this..
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ginaclarke/2019/01/31/meet-the-woman-who-sells-luxury-to-crypto-millionaires/#a21d0945b721
There is no female on this list of crypto millionaires:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-millionaires-5134439
some girl should start to change this..
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-millionaires-5134439
some girl should start to change this..
This is undoubtedly necessary. This leads men to feats: D
I don't think it's a need, they're human too with their interest, surely woman interested in tech are less than men. Like less men are interested in fashion compared to woman. But having women around here is good, make some men become less rude maybe
If this is another talk on feminism or some sort of gender equality I'm out of here. Rather than focusing the contribution of women in blockchain. Why don't we look at the contribution of each people in blockchain not just women. I am not degrading the ability of women in blockchain but I know that they could contribute equally as what men contributes in the society.
Well, the logic is simple, women don't risk that much compared to men because they always wanted to be secured. The reason why is that most of the time, women were taken advantage and fooled by the people.
If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
It is all about in the interest. Even you will say that women wants more security you can't guarantee that if there will be more women who will join the industry we can have a better security. I see no exact difference if women will dominate towards this industry or maybe we will have a slower progress but more efficient I guess?
She needs to be put back in blockchain now! (According to the OP).
Did the author even tried to interview any woman in Crypto before pushing an idea?
I need to put my Anti SJW thread back in blockchain!
I was randomly looking into hardware wallet reviews. She got a new subscriber. Then I thought about that insane thread right here...
Only 18K subs?
Well, the logic is simple, women don't risk that much compared to men because they always wanted to be secured. The reason why is that most of the time, women were taken advantage and fooled by the people.
If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
That is it, I have tried to speak with some women on blockchain technology but the first thing that do come out of their months is how secure the cryptocurrencies is? It is very difficult for women to takes financial risk and very few are giving that grace. I do believe that cryptocurrencies market will actract women when it has become a bit more stabilize and many social media and news sites started to speak good of it. We are also at the level were governments has not spoken in favour of bitcoin and women do believe that whatever governments is against is not good for our society but blockchain technology is not for governments to legalize but to see how good the system is and adopt it into our financial system. If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
Well, the logic is simple, women don't risk that much compared to men because they always wanted to be secured. The reason why is that most of the time, women were taken advantage and fooled by the people.
If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
If women are committed to the blockchain, it means that blockchain has earned enough security to convince women nature of judgment in security. If a woman joined blockchain, it doesn't mean that they are pro-feminist. I am a woman and I know that I am talking about!
I will leave this video here for reference. It does agree with you:
50 REAL Differences Between Men & Women
And, i think every one in this thread should see it...
Um, Should i also mention MyCrypto somewhere too?
What would be the difference if we have more women in blockchain?
I don't think that it would really matter if the blockchain user is a women or men ?
Are there any specially features that would only be shown to women or men?
I don't think that it would really matter if the blockchain user is a women or men ?
Are there any specially features that would only be shown to women or men?
I think you nailed it there. The difference being that it doesn't matter. If women choose to be in the blockchain then they are free to do so at their perusal.
This is nothing more than politically motivated identitarian bollocks sold to us under the guise of equality.
Like the guy who quoted me earlier. It's not about men and women, rationale or logic, it's about power.
What would be the difference if we have more women in blockchain?
I don't think that it would really matter if the blockchain user is a women or men ?
Are there any specially features that would only be shown to women or men?
I don't think that it would really matter if the blockchain user is a women or men ?
Are there any specially features that would only be shown to women or men?
I wish I could dish out merit like candy. So many good answers on this thread.
The only reason there is gender inequality in the blockchain is because women CHOOSE not to be interested in it. You know how many times I've tried getting my wife into my techy stuff only to be patted on the head and told, "That's nice dear" as she goes away to get on with the stuff she enjoys doing? Countless times.
This feminist bollox is cancer.
Damn, in the few discords I am in do you know how many men would give their right nuts to see a few more women in our community? There you go
The only reason there is gender inequality in the blockchain is because women CHOOSE not to be interested in it. You know how many times I've tried getting my wife into my techy stuff only to be patted on the head and told, "That's nice dear" as she goes away to get on with the stuff she enjoys doing? Countless times.
This feminist bollox is cancer.
Damn, in the few discords I am in do you know how many men would give their right nuts to see a few more women in our community? There you go
The danger is to look at this SJW pandemic and seeking answers from an engineer's rational brain. This is a political move on our crypto chess game. The goal is control, not logic, not giving power back to the people away from the banksters.
https://www.history.com/news/human-computers-women-at-nasa
To be be clear: this SJW plague is not feminism. Just cancer. Get Woke! Go Broke!
I wish I could dish out merit like candy. So many good answers on this thread.
The only reason there is gender inequality in the blockchain is because women CHOOSE not to be interested in it. You know how many times I've tried getting my wife into my techy stuff only to be patted on the head and told, "That's nice dear" as she goes away to get on with the stuff she enjoys doing? Countless times.
This feminist bollox is cancer.
Damn, in the few discords I am in do you know how many men would give their right nuts to see a few more women in our community? There you go
The only reason there is gender inequality in the blockchain is because women CHOOSE not to be interested in it. You know how many times I've tried getting my wife into my techy stuff only to be patted on the head and told, "That's nice dear" as she goes away to get on with the stuff she enjoys doing? Countless times.
This feminist bollox is cancer.
Damn, in the few discords I am in do you know how many men would give their right nuts to see a few more women in our community? There you go
Jump to: