Thanks.
I've also noticed that the reported hashrate varies by quite a bit. Is this calculated based on actual results or something else? Here's an example:
Looks like you are mining x16 family algo, or similar(bitcore, timetravel and x21s). Each of these algorithms have hashorder thing. By simply saying, more green there - higher hashrate I've also noticed that the reported hashrate varies by quite a bit. Is this calculated based on actual results or something else? Here's an example:
To my understanding, variance is and should be happening only on x16r and x16rt since the used algos vary, for others just the order changes so it should be stable
Lets say it takes 10ms to calculate a slow algo and 1ms a fast one, so if you do slow first then the fast one, its 10 + 1 = 11ms
And if the order is reversed then its 1 + 10 = 11ms again... Just that you eventually do it with more algos.
x16r and x16rt the algos used are random (from a given set) so it varies, but for example x16s, its same algos but different order, so it remains stable
maybe I miss something, but this logic supports my own experience mining them
They random too. And, e.g. dedal, can even change amount of that hash functions in chain. Probably "hash order" bad term here, need to rename it somehow. 