Topic: Will Initial Model Offering(IMO) replace Initial Exchange Offering(IEO)? (Read 1331 times)

I'm starting to have different view for IMO because very good projects are using the exchange, for example BTE, world business token and XRG Hashnet which are both promising Japanese project, i think IMO platform have a upper chance

Sounds like vetted IEOs on trusted exchanges like ecxx and Binance would be safer. If the project in your model doesn't produce good returns early in development, no more IMO investors will come.

The IMO idea of keeping value alive is really working and yes it's a fair win for both investors and project owners, but presently all projects using IMO are asian projects maybe things will change if projects from other parts of the world start using the find raising strategy

No actually i did my home work very well and that's why i made mention about the 10% in my first post but since you are so blinded by sentiment you couldn't see that part, (the bold part of the post above.... read brah)...... i join the telegram group because i was curious and believe me when i say am glad i did... i gat to do some research now, don't i?

and about usdo, well even if you did not mention it at the beginning of your thread but somehow it is now part of the project and since it was specifically created to pay hunters i believe it is worth mentioning... or don't you think? after all this is imo Ann thread and all things imo should be discuss here (the bad, the good and the ugly)..... don't take it personal,

and like you said, this is decentralized space and open to any form of discussion and criticism so i don't know why imo should be an exception, between it is not up to you tell anyone what to right.... otherwise you are indirectly trying to influence people's thought about this project, but, am excluded

instead of trying so hard to defend a project you claim you don't have any part of, why don't you make yourself useful in other ways

mind you ieo was something new and lots of thread were created about it, forum members said their views and opinions about ieo, nobody went crazy with sentiment  so same should apply to imo, it is new and i reserve the right to say my opinion, and i don't give a flying F**k if you are okey with it or not, most especially since you are not even part of the brain behind the project.

Believe me, you don't need to tell me about imo, i have already read through the skeleton whitepaper they provided and my opinion still remain same..... process that.

Projects need to be excellent enough and the IMO ecological platform will strictly control and implement certain security measures. Therefore, we should invest in stages to reduce risks. Must monitor projects and even scammers.

I believe the Original Model Delivery (IMO) will replace the original Exchange Offer (IEO). IEO is stronger than ever, surpassing previous major projects. but it's time for IMO to follow suit and have the opportunity to surpass it at any time. 

Glad to see you vent your anger on them just like you claim. Not participating in the Bounty and I wonder what you claim to be doing in their Bounty group.

Only deluded enough to note that those guys made their rules clear for all to see before jumping into their Bitcointalk campaign.

Yes if I knew about USD0 I would have written about it when this thread was first published. But clearly as at the time I did my own research like you failed to do, the so called USD0 wasn't available in their platform. And now this brings me back to your USD0 questions. I read USD0 isn't a trading coin or token but it is used to participate in their Presale tokens. Why are you so lazy to read before writing negative review about them here, I think you're among those hunters spreading Fud in their community even after collecting their reward like most Project failed to pay you all. By the way, those presale tokens are clearly trading in their own Exchange. So looks like a good deal.

Talking about locking rewards? Not true mate, again read before writing what makes you happy, for it won't be good to condemn a new innovations in the Crypto marketplace for your selfish desire, they release 10% for hunters already which hunters sold for a minimum of 2.6% rise for those who participated... This is clearly far better than most Bounties out their that failed to give hunters their deserve reward or in a situation where hunters were paid in dumped tokens. Forget about the hate and appreciate good for once.

The Crypto space is decentralised and if we keep writing negative review about new innovations in the space, the the purpose of a decentralised ecosystem isn't worth it.

PS: I am not in anyway associated with IMO Platform. I decided to publish it here because it is something new and different in the space after reading about it.

I have had much regarding this project but I really do not have much to say as the intentions are good but as a new Innovation we are looking forth for better move. Meanwhile, all needed is what will really help the growth of crypto market and what will certainly bring investors back so if this innovation will, congrats and kudos but I am a person that appreciate new innovation and I look forward for the best. I do not have much to say till it tastes little bit of time but the use case is cool.

I just heard IMO, I have never heard of projects that raise funds through IMO. for now Investors still choose to join IEO. IEO is still profitable and there are no cases experienced by investors regarding fraud on IEO. I support IMO.  I hope that everyone's support for IMO can continue.

A lot of difference between IEO and IMO. Every presale token ongoing in daily but you can set alarm when token sell start it’s very fantastic. IEO is going slowly and investors boring this method. In that case, IMO platform is trying different thing to attract new investors. Every single IMO presale token listed only IMO exchange within few days after token sell. I hope most of the people’s support it.                      

IEO is enough for me too and I have no interest to invest in IMO projects but yet I believe IMO is different from IEO and they are offering something new. If you ever see the IMO app and how it works, you will feel good because the idea and the tech behind it is very cool, though most of their ongoing sale projects are unknown. I think we need to welcome unique ideas in crypto, let's see what IMO can do for the crypto world in 2020.

Lol! Bounty hunters are normally a bit dumb" coming from a member who has the qualification to participate in cryptotalk signature am not surprise, i mean since you are in a btc campaign you feel rest of hunters are dumb to be campaigning for non btc paying campaigns, and i suppose you know how to detect a good and honest project.

I am not interested in new ways of calling for capital, because no matter what, after listing in the exchange, its price will be panic sell. I only care about the price of the token after being listed, and how can they keep the token price stable in the long run to help investors on their project get profit. And for now IEO is enough and I believe it will work well over the next few years along with the top exchanges, IMO really nothing too different from the current IEO

honesty can not solve the funding issue, what the investor needs are a unique idea and high return of investment. even a legit project could not afford to meet their softcap this year because of lack of demand from the investors.

Exactly! No matter what strategy they are coming up with as long as they don't have massive benefit to even ordinary users, in the end, they will not be successful in this new scheme. Long term goal is to have good adoption from the community, because without actual usage in the market, the project is basically heading to its grave.

This is not the first time when a project offers a new sale system but it won't accept widely until a big exchange or project supports it. We have seen some other sale method in this year, the IEO method works because Binance, Huobi, Gateio, oKex supported it. I realize that IMO has such unique and potential ideas, I did their bounty too and I hope after IEO, people will follow this new and catchy sale system.

These new ideas need to be tested in practice. However, it does not seem that the participants in the bounty campaigns will really like it if they are needed in this IMO. I don’t really want to participate in the same year or even more in one project.
However, I liked the idea that it will be possible to trade in the wallet itself, and transaction data will automatically be displayed on the exchange. I was expecting the appearance of something like this. This is quite convenient and, possibly, will increase the security of using our cryptocurrency.

Wow another way of raising funds, Initial Model Offering. From ICO to IEO, STO to IMO, the way of collecting funds to support a crypto project has gone through. I do not believe these ways of raising funds. What I believe is the honest and credible project. If a crypto project is honest, it can raise funds enough to support its idea regardless of ICO, IEO, STO or IMO.

Probably the reason why they are creating too many systems from time to time is to update the existing system yet, make a name for it so people could recognize it different from the way it is before. But in fact, it is their strategy to take ownership of a new trend in the market. But for me, for them to be successful in implementing IMO, is if it has really a good capabilities to offer for the people to benefit from it.

The only advantage is it takes only four weeks tofinish the presale , what is the other advantage of that kind of offering?
I mean for me they only change the name but nothings is new to offer things or solve any problem from IEO and ICO . If they cant change anything it will also end.