Topic: Will Initial Model Offering(IMO) replace Initial Exchange Offering(IEO)? - page 2. (Read 1246 times)

I think this is a good update, because every year there are always developments and finally a new system is created which will certainly be more profitable for investors and projects. So I will wait for IMO to become popular next year

You are right there was a big transition from Initial Coin Offering (ICO) to the Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) fund raising model which provides more assurances for investors by offering better quality and market liquidity, and this appears to be a similar model just to gradual token release in stages and it may catch on or may not we shall have to wait and see

Well this model of launching a crypto project is not bad as in a way you really see the dedication of the team in coming out with a product unlike ICOs and IEOs.  I hope to seeing some great projects coming with this model and not the numerous scam projects that infiltrated this industry for the past two years.

You have a point. IEO has not totally failed and it ameliorated a lot of issues even till date so I don't really see any need to revamp IEO at the moment. Also I understand IMO locks 90 percent of investors token which is release over a period of 365 days; this, I don't think will impress and attract investors

The ICO and IEO tokensale model thrived in their time because it gave investors returns on their capital so I can see the IMO tokensale model taking over IEOs because it has a much more compelling investment model, I personally haven't tried it but I have a couple of friends who has and they have nothing but good to say about it, let's see what the future holds.

Yeah, i am participating in their signature and social campaign also. It’s was only 4 weeks campaign i think so that a lot of hunters joined in this campaign. IMO is already developed own platform likes exchange and offering different coins those are still going in presale round such as IMO this one is exchange token than HCE,MDNS,XLA etc. Project right now strongly progressed.                 

Any kind of token offering will replace IEO as long as the investors see good results or advantages. If IMO can provide a new good outcome regarding token sales then it is highly possible that it will boom and for sure that start-up projects will choose IMO to help them raise some funds.

You said it. 100% ICO cannot be blamed. The method of raising funds is not what you should be judging a project on. There will always be investors in projects if the projects are good. I don't see why this user thinks the method of raising funds determines the outcome of the project. Bounty hunters are normally a bit dumb. IT is great to want to earn but you should be earning from a good project. The project should be so good that you don't dump because you believe it will increase in value.

I don't understand why you think only bounty hunters are interested in ico? why do you have that impression? because as far as i know ico's are design to raise funds where everyone is expected to participate, so how does this only affect bounty hunters! any project whether ico, ieo or self funding can decide to run a bounty to promote their project because as you can see it is a way of marketing, bounty hunters are interested in any campaign that they can earn a reward from, be it ico, imo, ieo or even btc paying campaign like the one you currently in, so i don't understand what you mean 

indeed at this time many methods have emerged and become the best solution to be able to avoid the scam of projects that have the aim to steal the funds of investors, whereas I see IEO is still very good to be applied in large exchange places that have a good reputation, as evidenced by many IEOs from Binance and Kucoin which can be sold out in a very short time, so in my opinion the IEO method is still appropriate.

No one in this market is interested in ICO except bounty hunters. The ICO is completely dead and no investors are interested in it, and the IEO is currently replacing the ICO to fund new projects. But in my opinion, IEO will die in the next few months and IMO will replace it

I think IEO is better enough that they are not a failure. It actually depends on the selection of the bourse to not directly accept the project that holds the IEO, at least the stock exchange is more careful and conducts a video call and office verification or does some sort of AMA to the project owners, if I see the actual IMO system back again with my explanation in IEO, any new system must be good, actually is we need a third party that holds funds and can be trusted in IEO, the market is still red so it is difficult to say IEO failed and must be replaced with IMO

A new kind of fundraising again? I think it will not succeed just as IEO had before. IEOs successfully launched because there are many people who hate ICO tried to invest with IEO projects. They thought that it will change the aspects of fundraising yet it is not. The existence of IMO right now will not be popular because there are still people who have interest for both ieo and ico.

First, am not your mate, i hope that sunk in, and about my post, no i don't just go about writing what makes me happy because clearly writing about the deceit of this project to hunters is not among what makes me happy ,

And if you were that clever enough, you would realize that i did not only talk about usdo but also about the pyramid structure of imo project but since you are so defensive you quickly pick the part that itches you the most,

And do note that i never took part in the bounty and am i glad i didn't, i mean who does that? Lock up participants reward for a year, those who participated made the choice to,  but it doesn't stop anyone from discussing about it,
This is an open platform incase you haven't noticed,

Why do you act as if you are the project owner? You are just a frustrated hunter like the rest of us so don't act any better,
They are paying hunters with an unknown usdo and i ask where it is traded, if you know provide an answer otherwise keep mute,

You should visit their telegram especially the bounty group to see reactions of hunters   most especially because of the lock reward,
Expect more to invade this place or open a thread about this project.

P.s.
IMO or whatever is no different from ieo or ico so don't act like this is some groundbreaking project, infact it is a pyramid scheme that should be avoided.

So anyone heard from IMO project. I once heard and saw them a lot of signature post about them and social posts but I dont like the way their promote it. It is somehow like an IEO but this one is like copying what's done already. For those who joined signature or campaign of it, can I ask news what happened to their progress?

Next it'll be IWO, Initial Whatever Offering, with 'whatever' being whatever scammers can dream up to scam people into believing that their 'project' is worth investing in.  That's where all of this seems to be headed now that all the people have been fooled in the ico space. 

There's a sucker born every minute, but there seems to be an overabundance in the world of crypto because no matter what gets thrown at them time after time, there always seem to be more suckers trying to catch it each time.  And the worse the project, the more suckers come out of the woodwork.  It's absolutely amazing.

Hello mate, what exactly are you referring to? Do you just jump around and write what makes you happy or what? This thread has been here even before they launched the Bounty campaign. I did not mention anything relating to USD0 here, so why saying or discussing what's not here? If you have been deceived or you got burnt while trying to make some quick bucks, don't pour your hate here mate. It doesn't tell good of you. It simply shows you are an angry Hunter who probably didn't do some research before jumping in to participate in whatever you participated in.

Please read my previous thread, it will help you in your Bounty Hunting Quest

Why does this sound like a pyramid scheme to me? investors will have their funds locked and receive only %10 of their investment and rest of the remaining %80 will be unlock through referring someone how is this different from all this pyramid scheme who force investors to refer someone to earn!
and i heard hunters too will face the same compulsory lock of their reward, is this udso trading anywhere? well i hope those who participate in this campaign will enjoy their %10

IEO still works well in this time, so I think it wouldnt replacable by other offering even IMO
look at the big exchange already offered their IEO. it means that IEO would be becomed popular

in the others side, we actually dont need much about what offering type to crypto
but we need the good project, no matter the offering type, if the project is shit, it would be shit too

They could freely do that because the lack of law enforcement with something that happens on the internet and most of the time the authority doesn't take it seriously. But honestly, IMO won't replace IEO anytime soon. What I mean is, both the crowdfunding model could just exist and people will have the option. The very first thing people consider when it comes to investing in IEO is the fact that it was hosted by popular exchange and they automatically have the mindset of a project that is hosted by large companies more specifically exchange is legit although this IMO model could just do that.