Why not then simply hide their names via appropriate privacy settings?
That would be even weirder. You're telling me that before there was any mention of the site here or on any social media, the new dice site managed to attract two high rollers in the span of 24h, and those two high rollers went on to dominate the daily competition for several months? Color me skeptical
Why would that be even weirder?
You can hide your account name via changing your privacy settings, the effect of which you can see for yourself in the screenshots you provided. Truth be told, I'm not even sure what is weird in two old accounts being active again as they may have been active all that time (though not actively gambling). They were not necessarily high rollers back in the day. You just keep telling that something is fishy at wolf.bet but don't tell what exactly. Are you that guy who questioned the veracity of the number of bets made in so short a time span? Hope someone of that high rollers comes here and makes a statement
You seem a bit slow, so let me put it more bluntly. I'm not questioning the number of bets, I'm questioning the fact that the only accounts that appear to be winning the daily wagering contest are those, that are probably linked to the owner / are the owner's. But since you're on the site's payroll, I guess it is your job not to understand such things
But does it make any sense?
Really, why would the owner or accounts linked to the owner participate in that contest? Well, I may be a bit slow, but to me it doesn't make any sense. But perhaps, I'm missing something here. Care to explain? Regardless, if the owners really wanted something to that tune (say, to attract public attention), it would be plain stupid to use the same accounts every day (if this is the case indeed). More likely, these are just some random folks with deep pockets exploiting the opportunity to earn dough while there is not a lot of competition