Wolf's XMR GPU Miner - page 10. | Bitcointalksearch.org

bhanu545

full member

Activity: 706

Merit: 100

I have 6 gpus but it wnt work whatever i do. Index 0 says error parsing. If i use index 1 it says no device found.

I think there is something wrong with amd software or miner itself.
Amd version is 16.10

el_rlee

legendary

Activity: 1600

Merit: 1014

Thanks for publishing your miner!

I managed to compile it - but can't get it running....

Code:

root@ubunturig:/home/ubuntu/xmrmining/wolf-xmr-miner-master# ./miner xmr.conf 
[14:23:06] Setting up GPU(s).
Killed
root@ubunturig:/home/ubuntu/xmrmining/wolf-xmr-miner-master# amdconfig --list-adapters
* 0. 06:00.0 AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
  1. 0b:00.0 AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
  2. 0e:00.0 AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
  3. 13:00.0 AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
  4. 17:00.0 AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series

* - Default adapter

root@ubunturig:/home/ubuntu/xmrmining/wolf-xmr-miner-master# cat xmr.conf 
{
	"Algorithms":
	[
		{
			"name": "CryptoNight",
			"devices":
			[
				{
					"index": 0,
					"corefreq": 500,
					"memfreq": 1500,
					"fanspeed": 65,
					"powertune": 20,
					"threads": 1,
					"rawintensity": 384,
					"worksize": 8
				},
				{
					"index": -1,
					"threads": 2,
					"rawintensity": 16,
					"worksize": 16
				}
			],
			"pools":
			[
				{
					"url": "stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333",
					"user": "43SLUTpyTgXCNXsL43uD8FWZ5wLAdX7Ak67BgGp7dxnGhLmrffDTXoeGm2GBRm8JjigN9PTg2gnShQn5gkgE1JGWJr4gsEU",
					"pass": "x"
				}
			]
		}
	]
}

managed to get it working - was a driver problem...

getting

Code:

[18:37:33] Thread 1, GPU ID 1, GPU Type: Tonga: 549.97H/s
[18:37:33] Thread 2, GPU ID 2, GPU Type: Tonga: 549.92H/s
[18:37:34] Thread 0, GPU ID 0, GPU Type: Tonga: 549.79H/s
[18:37:34] Thread 3, GPU ID 3, GPU Type: Tonga: 549.78H/s
[18:37:34] Thread 4, GPU ID 4, GPU Type: Tonga: 549.86H/s
[18:37:35] Share accepted: 262/262 (100.00%)
[18:37:35] Total Hashrate: 2749.32H/s

problem now is:

Code:

root@ubunturig:~# amdconfig --adapter=all --odgt

Adapter 0 - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
            Sensor 0: Temperature - 96.00 C
ERROR - Get temperature failed for Adapter 1 - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
ERROR - Get temperature failed for Adapter 2 - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
ERROR - Get temperature failed for Adapter 3 - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series
ERROR - Get temperature failed for Adapter 4 - AMD Radeon (TM) R9 380 Series

montas101

newbie

Activity: 51

Merit: 0

reflexmk

sr. member

Activity: 289

Merit: 250

tony_crunk

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

1394 for two RX470 memory strap, core 1126-849 mV, mem 1950 849 mV

4 thread at 347-350 h/s each

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Quote from: anakbaru on December 21, 2016, 01:30:00 PM

Quote from: tony_crunk on December 21, 2016, 10:03:37 AM

an other optimizzation

"rawintensity": 512,

1394 h/s

1394 h/s for each card or two card?
thanks

He seems to indicate above that was for both cards, and it sounds about right to me. Thanks.

anakbaru

jr. member

Activity: 60

Merit: 1

Quote from: tony_crunk on December 21, 2016, 10:03:37 AM

an other optimizzation

"rawintensity": 512,

1394 h/s

1394 h/s for each card or two card?
thanks

tony_crunk

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

an other optimizzation

"rawintensity": 512,

1394 h/s

tony_crunk

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

hello,

I found a good setting for my two rx470

   "threads": 2,
   "rawintensity": 508,
   "worksize": 4

with this setting I've a 1382/1384 h/s in wolf vs 1366 h/s in claymore at at same consuption (210w at wall)

please try an other combination and share it

hello

dallase

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 10

Quote from: dallase on December 18, 2016, 05:38:57 PM

pushing 658 h/s per card. 12 cards. about 7890 total.

and minus bad shares and pool fee = ~7.6Kh/s

never reports anywhere close to that... gonna repoint to dwarfpool and see what gives.

dallase

member

Activity: 129

Merit: 10

pushing 658 h/s per card. 12 cards. about 7890 total.

however, rates on monero.crypto-pool.fr never agree. I realize they estimate based on # of shares, but its consistently 15-25% lower.

Pool side estimates last ~30m or so... (but consistent over several days)
5.82Kh
6.75Kh
6.30Kh
6.20Kh
5.89Kh
6.06Kh
5.89Kh
5.67Kh

Rare occasions I see it get into the 6.6-7.0Kh/s range, but never ~7.8Kh like I see on my client side. You would think if I have 7.8Kh, it would report rates between 6.5Kh/s and 9.0Kh/s on pool side.

I do have a few bad shares... but like 98.5%+ valid shares. Not enough bad shares to have that big of impact.

Anyone else use crypto-pool and can verify their rates vs pool estimates?

bobben2

full member

Activity: 279

Merit: 104

R9 280X running at 995/1600 gets me 530 h/s with 2 threads:

Code:

				{
					"index": 0,
					"threads": 2,
					"rawintensity": 484,
					"worksize": 8
				}

R9 390 running at 1000/1500 gets me ~740 h/s with the following config:

Code:

                             {
                                        "index": 1,
                                        "threads": 1,
                                        "rawintensity": 984,
                                        "worksize": 8
                                },

both on Ubuntu 14.04 using fglrx..

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Thanks, I will give that a try, appreciate it!

Trimegistus

legendary

Activity: 1564

Merit: 1027

endlessskill

hero member

Activity: 531

Merit: 500

AMD | Mining | NVIDIA

Quote from: owlcatz on December 17, 2016, 06:47:52 PM

Quote from: lexele on December 17, 2016, 06:10:35 PM

It's a pity you don't update this miner, it's rock stable and low consumption. Ilove it and stil use it.

Anyone care to share their xmr.conf settings for a Radeon RX 480? I hate using claymore's miner, but I can't seem to get anywhere near as good a hashrate.

Thanks.

{
   "Algorithms":
   [
      {
         "name": "CryptoNight",
         "devices":
         [
            {
               "index": 0,
               "threads": 1,
               "rawintensity": 1008,
               "worksize": 8            },
            {
               "index": 1,
               "threads": 1,
               "rawintensity": 1008,
               "worksize": 8
            },
            {
               "index": 2,
               "threads": 1,
               "rawintensity": 1008,
               "worksize": 8
            },
            {
               "index": 3,
               "threads": 1,
               "rawintensity": 1008,
               "worksize": 8
            }
         ],
         "pools":
         [
            {
               "url": "stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005",
               "user": "4AmmpktUio3RtHVqRGhCJxefnRkzEajRtV9JoxMfT4B63xuikYonzWAErf652Jiv6jSvyShF8XKTdbF TgqeWVyaN1JcKmCo.42",
               "pass": "x"
            }
         ]
      }
   ]
}

4xRX480

lexele

full member

Activity: 190

Merit: 100

intensity 1000 / worksize 8.

And Wolfs XMR is more dependant to GPU clock.

I don't get same hashrate than claymore's, but if you substract devfee and consumption economy, wolf's is better.

owlcatz

legendary

Activity: 3570

Merit: 1959

Quote from: lexele on December 17, 2016, 06:10:35 PM

It's a pity you don't update this miner, it's rock stable and low consumption. Ilove it and stil use it.

Anyone care to share their xmr.conf settings for a Radeon RX 480? I hate using claymore's miner, but I can't seem to get anywhere near as good a hashrate.

Thanks.

lexele

full member

Activity: 190

Merit: 100