Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 22.

5w00p

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 502

Quote from: MagicSnow on July 05, 2014, 05:27:44 AM

I'm having a problem in Ubuntu 14 (32bit)

when i make i got the following errors:

Code:

make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Errir 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

i have installed all the lib etc: libcurl4-gnutls-dev automake build-essential libtool libssl-dev git

Maybe the fact your ubuntu is 32-bit and not 64 has something to do with it?

Try looking through the config.log file...

MagicSnow

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

I'm having a problem in Ubuntu 14 (32bit)

when i make i got the following errors:

Code:

make[2]: *** [minerd-cryptonight_lobotomized.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/.../cpuminer-multi'
make: *** [all] Error 2

i have installed all the lib etc: libcurl4-gnutls-dev automake build-essential libtool libssl-dev git

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 02:31:12 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 06:08:03 AM

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 06:06:58 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:43:15 AM

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 05:42:04 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:34:40 AM

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 05:30:25 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 01:22:35 AM

Quote from: earther on June 15, 2014, 11:47:44 PM

It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

Huh

this?

No.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

no help to me..
some of them hash very well
are they blocking mining now?
i can give u acces to one of the problem servers if u want to figure out what is the problem

Sorry - the non-AES-NI build isn't working. Use Lucas' for now, I need to fix it.

ABISprotocol

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 252

ABISprotocol on Gist

Quote from: 5w00p on July 05, 2014, 03:18:00 AM

Thank you for the step-by-step guide! Now running the miner under Ubuntu 14.04

Grin

Yay! :-) Happy to have helped in some small way.

5w00p

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 502

Thank you for the step-by-step guide! Now running the miner under Ubuntu 14.04

Grin

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: xxnirvana69xx on June 16, 2014, 01:23:48 PM

Hashing at 410-430 locally but only pulling about 330 on http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/

Vardiff means that your hashrate at the pool may vary - you're still getting paid for your full hashrate, though.

ABISprotocol

sr. member

Activity: 278

Merit: 252

ABISprotocol on Gist

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 05:56:59 PM

Quote from: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 05:06:36 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 03:57:20 PM

Quote from: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 02:28:13 PM

Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.

A step-by-step guide would take quite a while and would only work on Arch Linux x64...

Step by step guide? Not for windows, but for linux / Ubuntu 12.04 LTS / Wubi / Ubuntu 14.04 specific... see:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7652438 (comment covers 12.04 LTS / Wubi / 14.04 of Ubuntu)
also:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7634323 (covers Ubuntu 14.04 etc)

andrepd

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: equipoise on July 04, 2014, 10:56:29 AM

^If you are using the PC while mining it could become slow if all the threads are used. You could try running it with below normal priority on 2 threads if it's OK for you. If you are not using the PC mine on 2 threads (normal priority), but monitor the temperature to stay appropriate for your processor with a good Distance to TJ MAX. Also keep your fan clean. I use Realtemp for monitoring the temperature.

I'm cloud mining, testing for profitability, so that isn't an issue.

equipoise

hero member

Activity: 794

Merit: 1000

Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable

^If you are using the PC while mining it could become slow if all the threads are used. You could try running it with below normal priority on 2 threads if it's OK for you. If you are not using the PC mine on 2 threads (normal priority), but monitor the temperature to stay appropriate for your processor with a good Distance to TJ MAX. Also keep your fan clean. I use Realtemp for monitoring the temperature.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: mcpackin on June 16, 2014, 12:35:39 PM

Awesome, just pulled and it seems to be fixed Cheesy

... I do have an odd issue with a few EC2 instances... They start at 1Kh/s and drop to about 385Kh/s... I am not sure why yet..

Throttling, most likely - you're using cheap ones?

andrepd

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

One question: when I start the miner on my 2 core machine, it spawns only one thread, and runs at ~35H/s. When I use `-t 2` it runs at nearly double, 60-70H/s. What are the downsides, if any, of running two threads. I'm presuming there is a reason the miner spawns only 1 on a 2 core machine.

Alpinist

full member

Activity: 146

Merit: 100

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 05:56:59 PM

Quote from: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 05:06:36 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 03:57:20 PM

Quote from: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 02:28:13 PM

Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.

A step-by-step guide would take quite a while and would only work on Arch Linux x64...

Ok. It's worth to wait for.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Yup, I done broke it - reverted the last commit for now. That'll teach me to push commits without testing.

Alpinist

full member

Activity: 146

Merit: 100

Quote from: Wolf0 on July 02, 2014, 03:57:20 PM

Quote from: Alpinist on July 02, 2014, 02:28:13 PM

Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

It's not easy. If you're not good at cross-compiling, I'd give up.

It's clear that it's not easy.
Would you kindly make a step-by-step guide?

I think many people in this thread are not very strong at cross-compiling but wanna be a little bit.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: mcpackin on June 16, 2014, 11:50:03 AM

Quote from: mindless on June 16, 2014, 06:59:01 AM

Quote from: Agamemnus on June 15, 2014, 10:17:29 PM

Quote from: phzi on June 15, 2014, 08:40:09 PM

Quote from: digicoin on June 15, 2014, 01:30:07 PM

Eerybody,

Please join Wolf's pool http://pool.cryptoescrow.eu/#

My miners are on it. My hash rate is higher and more stable than in other pools

No block in 10 hours with that hashrate is worrying...

All the pools are showing the same thing. I read somewhere it's because of a really high orphan rate.

Everything is fixed up - pool is running smoothly.

I am showing a lot of these:

Code:

[2014-06-16 16:42:36] stratum_recv_line failed
[2014-06-16 16:42:36] ...retry after 10 seconds

I have miners pointed to stratum+tcp://pool.cryptoescrow.eu:3333, is this normal? I thought I read some where this is caused by something to do with the pool?

Pool is fine... although I didn't test my latest commit... I'll do that now.

Alpinist

full member

Activity: 146

Merit: 100

Can not compile win64 binaries from the source.
Is there any tutorial about how to do that?

ahu

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

I get 465 h/s with a Xeon E5-2670v2 and with "-t 11" parameter on Windows. And this with the CPU drawing only 58W. Happy with the efficiency Grin

supercoin434

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Is there any special params to run the miner under a Xeon? I have Xeon E5 but the miner keeps crashing. I have tried the AES and non-AES versions with same result Sad

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 06:06:58 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:43:15 AM

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 05:42:04 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 05:34:40 AM

Quote from: cisahasa on June 16, 2014, 05:30:25 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on June 16, 2014, 01:22:35 AM

Quote from: earther on June 15, 2014, 11:47:44 PM

It didn't show my hashrate. Is it normal ?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yc2p7zc8et3kupt/Capture.PNG

*facepaw* Okay, this is the LAST time I will answer this question. Yes, it is normal.

i have same issue, updated my VPS miners(60cores)
now none shows any hashrate, neither does pool= 0h/s
no single hash for hours
updating back to old miner..

Do they have AES-NI?

i dont think all of them have, chunkhost.com

Well, make sure that you're building the ones that don't with --disable-aes-ni, or they won't hash.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native"
./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

Huh

this?

No.

./autogen.sh
CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure --disable-aes-ni
make

sk00t3r

full member

Activity: 192

Merit: 100

Quote from: jadefalke on June 30, 2014, 02:49:52 PM

hi on a Intel Xeon E3-1225v3 i getting 189 h/s is that in the normal Range or should that be more? i configured it with march-native

On an Xeon E5-2430 v2 @ 2.5ghz I am getting about 198 h/s. I do not know how the two compare. Just thought Id throw some numbers at you.

Topic: Wolf's XMR/BCN/DSH CPUMiner - 2x speed compared to LucasJones' - NEW 06/20/2014 - page 22. (Read 547105 times)