Topic: World War 3 - page 13. (Read 13312 times)
Like a say before noth korea will launch the first nuke over US surely, but US have and advance tec to destroy any missile that target them so when that happen US will have the perfect oportunity to invade that country for sure.
US always in this last decade has the politics of "helping" other country in needs like Vietnam and others, thats the main reason that little dictatorship countrys like north korea hate US and will be stupid enought to start the ww3.
Yes, because the US won't stand for dictators who torture and starve their people while having the best of the best.
US always in this last decade has the politics of "helping" other country in needs like Vietnam and others, thats the main reason that little dictatorship countrys like north korea hate US and will be stupid enought to start the ww3.
Yes, because the US won't stand for dictators who torture and starve their people while having the best of the best. Conflict with regards to north korea and Us are getting worse. Yesterday Uss vinson are now heading to the land of singapore and will be staying their until they received another call from trump. This action is for the last nuclear test lunch of north korea.
Americans use against North Korea tactics anacondas. They gradually squeeze the Kim regime into a powerful embrace. The more Kim is trying to move the more Americans squeeze hug. At the first attempt Kim to attack it will be destroyed. I think he understands and will soon give up.Exactly, I do not support what US is currently doing interfering other countries but i do not agree more about what north korea is doong over the decades. When the war started between russia,china(which is the closest partner of NK), and US. You know woiuld win in terms of air combat,land and most especially on the marinal
Conflict with regards to north korea and Us are getting worse. Yesterday Uss vinson are now heading to the land of singapore and will be staying their until they received another call from trump. This action is for the last nuclear test lunch of north korea.
Americans use against North Korea tactics anacondas. They gradually squeeze the Kim regime into a powerful embrace. The more Kim is trying to move the more Americans squeeze hug. At the first attempt Kim to attack it will be destroyed. I think he understands and will soon give up.Exactly, I do not support what US is currently doing interfering other countries but i do not agree more about what north korea is doong over the decades. When the war started between russia,china(which is the closest partner of NK), and US. You know woiuld win in terms of air combat,land and most especially on the marinal
But i think many presidents are now in the spot light. Top it with Nokor's leader then trump winning the election. Kim started testing nuclear weapons while trump also started bombing terrorists. Then putin come's in for economic reasons. Good luck earth
The situation with North Korea is somewhat calm now. Trump seems to have toned down his rhetoric against the DPRK. The Chinese president is the one who should be praised for diffusing the tensions.
We would already be fighting the ww3 if Hillary had win.
I agree but not because of her actions but rather people's response to her as a leader.
I can't remember which country (Saudi Arabia?) They were literally protesting her arrival when she was secretary of state.
But i think many presidents are now in the spot light. Top it with Nokor's leader then trump winning the election. Kim started testing nuclear weapons while trump also started bombing terrorists. Then putin come's in for economic reasons. Good luck earth
We would already be fighting the ww3 if Hillary had win.
I agree but not because of her actions but rather people's response to her as a leader.
I can't remember which country (Saudi Arabia?) They were literally protesting her arrival when she was secretary of state.
Yeah but not so sure about that...
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
Don't forget that the Russians are having nuclear-tipped ICMBs such as the SS-18 Satan, which are capable of targeting the mainland US. But the American military bases in Europe and Japan are easier targets for the Russians.
I think that there will not be a world war. Human civilization has already passed that stage of development, when there were world wars. The territory is defined. Now only local military conflicts are possible
Yeah but not so sure about that...
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
Don't forget that the Russians are having nuclear-tipped ICMBs such as the SS-18 Satan, which are capable of targeting the mainland US. But the American military bases in Europe and Japan are easier targets for the Russians.
Yeah but not so sure about that...
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
Don't forget that the Russians are having nuclear-tipped ICMBs such as the SS-18 Satan, which are capable of targeting the mainland US. But the American military bases in Europe and Japan are easier targets for the Russians.
Yeah, That's what I thought. England And the USA will use Bombs.
England and the USA are a threat. Not assad using chemical Weapons
You've been thinking? Think again! The difference is that the US and Britain warned that they will use weapons, but Assad has already used. I'm not talking about the bombing of city blocks. England and the USA are a threat. Not assad using chemical Weapons
Yeah, That's what I thought. England And the USA will use Bombs.
England and the USA are a threat. Not assad using chemical Weapons
England and the USA are a threat. Not assad using chemical Weapons
It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?
LolIf there is a WW3 btc is the last of your concern xD
You should be more concerned about NOT DYING
Money is useless in times of war. All that count is food and shelter.
I believe that in a war between China/Russia vs United States, Europe won't be that much in trouble. The Netherlands even less. I have seen a map where you could see that Europe wouldn't directly be in danger in case of Nukes. Ofcourse, the aftermath of the bombing will also be terrible for 'us' but more in a way of; electricity, health problems and such. I believe that should be temprorary then but I must say I haven't read enough on this matter to know what I am talking about
. USA has DOZENS of military bases in Europe.
I don't see Russia ignoring that... War between the two would be accross Europe not accros the ocean :/
I don't believe that world war 3 will happen very soon, but I certainly want to say that if world war 3 happen then it will lead huge destruction by nuclear weapons. recent activities of USA and other countries are just to be meant of showing their arrogance.
It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?
LolIf there is a WW3 btc is the last of your concern xD
You should be more concerned about NOT DYING
Money is useless in times of war. All that count is food and shelter.
I believe that in a war between China/Russia vs United States, Europe won't be that much in trouble. The Netherlands even less. I have seen a map where you could see that Europe wouldn't directly be in danger in case of Nukes. Ofcourse, the aftermath of the bombing will also be terrible for 'us' but more in a way of; electricity, health problems and such. I believe that should be temprorary then but I must say I haven't read enough on this matter to know what I am talking about
. 
There's a price to pay for using nukes since someone would aslo likely nuke you back... back to the stone age. I doubt anyone from NATO would just go out and nuke without notice since other members would have to be consulted and negotiated with. China also unlikely since, you know, exports. There's no benefit to killing your customers. Russia, I'm not sure but they can just stick to conventional warfare + guerrilla tactic like they did in Crimea.
Now, North Korea, that's a whole different scenario. They pretty much survived without foreign interaction anyway so they have less incentives in keeping relationships. They would still probably not just push a button though, daddy China would not be pleased.
Never underestimate human capacity for stupidity.
Now, North Korea, that's a whole different scenario. They pretty much survived without foreign interaction anyway so they have less incentives in keeping relationships. They would still probably not just push a button though, daddy China would not be pleased.
I believe the ww3 will not being allowed to use nukes, that will destroy the world and ruined the entire ecosystem.
Never underestimate human capacity for stupidity.
It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?
LolIf there is a WW3 btc is the last of your concern xD
You should be more concerned about NOT DYING
Money is useless in times of war. All that count is food and shelter.
It seems that most of the guys here are certain that there will be a WW3. Aren't you guys afraid of the impact on bitcoins with this perspective on the near future? Wouldn't it be devastating or even meaning the end of bitcoins if there was such a big impact on the (electronical) world with the usage of nukes?
Jump to: