World War 3 - page 8. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Lieldoryn

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 272

Quote from: kimtaekayo on May 22, 2017, 04:55:23 PM

Quote from: Proton2233 on May 22, 2017, 07:40:47 AM

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

Oligarchs are everywhere and this war will be funded by them.
If you are familiar with the Rothschild.

No, the oligarchs are unable to Finance that which is contrary to the interests of the state. When Rothschild was concentrated in his hands the entire oil industry of America and began to influence the policy of his business was split into smaller companies which could have a significant impact. So do in countries where the government is not about shady schemes with the oligarchs.

kimtaekayo

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

Quote from: Proton2233 on May 22, 2017, 07:40:47 AM

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

Oligarchs are everywhere and this war will be funded by them.
If you are familiar with the Rothschild.

Katsudu

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Quote from: planfox on May 22, 2017, 01:44:40 PM

Quote from: Lecsor on May 22, 2017, 01:34:35 PM

Quote from: Wayan_Pedjeng on May 22, 2017, 01:25:34 PM

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

And how much it became known from the media Donald Trump another aircraft carrier sent to the North Korean region and it seems to me that this will not be with the enchanting movement of the Allied army including NATO. It seems to me that under certain circumstances, China and Russia will not support the presidents of North Korea. Perhaps the people of North Korea really need to be given the freedom to see the world and not what the authorities say to them.

planfox

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lecsor on May 22, 2017, 01:34:35 PM

Quote from: Wayan_Pedjeng on May 22, 2017, 01:25:34 PM

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

Lecsor

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Comprehensive Blockchain Billing Protocol

Quote from: Wayan_Pedjeng on May 22, 2017, 01:25:34 PM

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

Wayan_Pedjeng

sr. member

Activity: 913

Merit: 252

In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.

Proton2233

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

Communists and socialists do not recognize the right of private property. Russia has long passed the initial accumulation of capital and now from time to time is a bandit redistribution of property. These are signs of wild capitalism. All the oligarchs are relevant to the crime. This is the America of the 1930s.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on May 22, 2017, 06:50:43 AM

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:45:50 AM

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on May 22, 2017, 06:37:45 AM

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:33:09 AM

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Yes, communism is absolutely vile ideology - and Russians unlike corrupted european governments actually publicly denounced and dismantled it Wink

current system of the country is far closer to pre-communist Tsarist system, mixing nationalism and religion of forefathers.

Mecca of communism today is in Brussels, not in Moscow... to my shock.

I was talking about the udssr. Todays russia is an oligarchy.

@brüssel

Socialism != communism

Okurkabinladin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 506

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:45:50 AM

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on May 22, 2017, 06:37:45 AM

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:33:09 AM

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Yes, communism is absolutely vile ideology - and Russians unlike corrupted european governments actually publicly denounced and dismantled it Wink

current system of the country is far closer to pre-communist Tsarist system, mixing nationalism and religion of forefathers.

Mecca of communism today is in Brussels, not in Moscow... to my shock.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: Okurkabinladin on May 22, 2017, 06:37:45 AM

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:33:09 AM

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

Communism is the worst shit ever and you should call it out as what it is...

Edit

Islamic terrorism just bought 460 billion $ worth of US hightech weapons.
They can wage war through the whole century now.

Okurkabinladin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 506

Quote from: criptix on May 22, 2017, 06:33:09 AM

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

You know, it would be splendid, if we could stop name calling and returned to the premise of the thread (with was started by simpleton to begin with).

Personally, I dont see, medium term, window for yet another "war to end all wars". Russians/Chinese understand, that its costs would outweight any possible benefits and westerners... these days lack even common ethos, that would motivate them to fight a prolonged war.

If we are talking about global conflict, look at growth of muslim countries - but those wont fight directly with nukes either. They simply lack industrial base needed for modern warfare, therefore they instead chose trench warfare via creeping sharia law dismantling secular institutions and vastly superior demographics next to secular, atomized west.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Nato didnt need to waste one bullet to destroy the UdSSR sithara you wannabe commie.

Where is the udssr now hu?

Fact.

Want to know another fact majority of russias nukes are more then 50 years old and need to be renewed. But sadly russia has no $$ for that.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: chixka000 on May 21, 2017, 08:17:24 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 21, 2017, 12:46:06 AM

Quote from: Lancusters on May 20, 2017, 05:23:33 PM

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

Wrong as well russian nuclear weapons are somehow useless at all because US has more anti nuclear weapons and nope it is not true that russia has more nuclear weapons than Us they are actually just the same

If the Russian weapons were actually useless, then NATO could have invaded that country many decades back. And regarding the number of nukes in the possession of each country, check this:

chixka000

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 500

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 21, 2017, 12:46:06 AM

Quote from: Lancusters on May 20, 2017, 05:23:33 PM

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

Wrong as well russian nuclear weapons are somehow useless at all because US has more anti nuclear weapons and nope it is not true that russia has more nuclear weapons than Us they are actually just the same

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Lancusters on May 20, 2017, 05:23:33 PM

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

Clement Kaliyar

hero member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 532

Quote from: gollygosh on May 19, 2017, 02:54:25 PM

WW3 will be, 1 massive emp blast - followed by the end of crypto

If there is another world war there wont be anything because the nuclear weapons every major countries are holding will eventually wipe out everything on its way and not only will it be the end of crypto ,it might be the end of human culture as we know today. I dont think we will see a war that would consume everything,hope for the best.

Lancusters

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 263

Quote from: WarCry on May 20, 2017, 04:48:42 PM

Quote from: matuson on May 20, 2017, 11:48:47 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 19, 2017, 09:10:28 PM

Quote from: Burnardin on May 19, 2017, 12:51:45 PM

To America of missiles North Korea will not reach, and if before the war the us military will be out in the ocean then Kim will make no sense to bomb the territory of South Korea. The same applies to Japan. Kim has no chance in this war.

North Korea is making rapid progress with their missiles. The latest test was of particular interest to the defense analysis. Some say that North Korea already possess missiles which can reach mainland US.

I don't think it's real. If the Koreans had a chance to develop missiles which can reach America I'm sure the Americans would have been a blow for all objects which can produce such missiles and launchers of existing missiles. Agree it's stupid not to react to how your opponent is growing strongly.

how about rusia ?
they have a largest nuke power in the world

The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

WarCry

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: matuson on May 20, 2017, 11:48:47 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 19, 2017, 09:10:28 PM

Quote from: Burnardin on May 19, 2017, 12:51:45 PM

To America of missiles North Korea will not reach, and if before the war the us military will be out in the ocean then Kim will make no sense to bomb the territory of South Korea. The same applies to Japan. Kim has no chance in this war.

North Korea is making rapid progress with their missiles. The latest test was of particular interest to the defense analysis. Some say that North Korea already possess missiles which can reach mainland US.

I don't think it's real. If the Koreans had a chance to develop missiles which can reach America I'm sure the Americans would have been a blow for all objects which can produce such missiles and launchers of existing missiles. Agree it's stupid not to react to how your opponent is growing strongly.

how about rusia ?
they have a largest nuke power in the world

matuson

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 255

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 19, 2017, 09:10:28 PM

Quote from: Burnardin on May 19, 2017, 12:51:45 PM

To America of missiles North Korea will not reach, and if before the war the us military will be out in the ocean then Kim will make no sense to bomb the territory of South Korea. The same applies to Japan. Kim has no chance in this war.

North Korea is making rapid progress with their missiles. The latest test was of particular interest to the defense analysis. Some say that North Korea already possess missiles which can reach mainland US.

I don't think it's real. If the Koreans had a chance to develop missiles which can reach America I'm sure the Americans would have been a blow for all objects which can produce such missiles and launchers of existing missiles. Agree it's stupid not to react to how your opponent is growing strongly.

Malsetid

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 502

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 19, 2017, 09:10:28 PM

Quote from: Burnardin on May 19, 2017, 12:51:45 PM

To America of missiles North Korea will not reach, and if before the war the us military will be out in the ocean then Kim will make no sense to bomb the territory of South Korea. The same applies to Japan. Kim has no chance in this war.

North Korea is making rapid progress with their missiles. The latest test was of particular interest to the defense analysis. Some say that North Korea already possess missiles which can reach mainland US.

And even if they don't have a chance if you compare with the us military might, the fact that Kim can start a third world war would be enough reason for worry. It's not going to be about who's going to win or who's going to lose in a third world war. Once it starts, we're all going to be affected one way or another and that's nothing of the positive kind

Topic: World War 3 - page 8. (Read 13292 times)