Pages:
Author

Topic: World War 3 - page 7. (Read 13312 times)

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
May 28, 2017, 05:14:00 PM
they are absurd. that's not gonna happen. only there will be confusion because of economic shortfalls. the country is divided and there will be new powers. of the world 3. times will change, but not the war. polarization won't. stay calm and continue with your life. protect your money. don't waste it. Embarrassed
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 26, 2017, 11:13:26 PM
All wars are destructive and especially with modern capabilities. We must learn to avoid them and solve all problems peacefully.

Wars and conflicts will disappear once the population gets educated enough. See the list of ongoing conflicts around the globe. All of them are happening in the developing nations.

In addition to those countries in which there are conflicts, there are also those countries that are involved in these conflicts. And sometimes it pursues its goals and these parties are very well developed, who are leaders in political economic and military terms.

There are countries such as the United States and Russia who are indirectly involved in these conflicts. But they are just providing weapons and training. All the fighting is taking place inside Syria.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
May 26, 2017, 03:34:06 PM
All wars are destructive and especially with modern capabilities. We must learn to avoid them and solve all problems peacefully.

Wars and conflicts will disappear once the population gets educated enough. See the list of ongoing conflicts around the globe. All of them are happening in the developing nations.

In addition to those countries in which there are conflicts, there are also those countries that are involved in these conflicts. And sometimes it pursues its goals and these parties are very well developed, who are leaders in political economic and military terms.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 26, 2017, 12:26:10 PM
All wars are destructive and especially with modern capabilities. We must learn to avoid them and solve all problems peacefully.

Wars and conflicts will disappear once the population gets educated enough. See the list of ongoing conflicts around the globe. All of them are happening in the developing nations.
full member
Activity: 345
Merit: 100
May 26, 2017, 03:40:05 AM
This is very devastating to us, people. The best thing for us to evade this is to pray hard. This kind of cases should not be tolerated. During world war 2 I've heard the story of my grandmother almost everyday the only food they ate is only a bread. And I dont want everyone to suffer it. Its so hard we should imagine the outcome of this before going to war, every leader should mind these things-> treasure(economy), people, and their lands.

All wars are destructive and especially with modern capabilities. We must learn to avoid them and solve all problems peacefully.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
May 25, 2017, 09:01:04 PM
well, world war 3 will happen. And when it comes, people will use rock and stick to fight in the world war 4. Therefore, we should avoid the war as much as we can all the human will be elimiated

If a third world war occurs, then the next (4th) world war will be fought in the space. Because the earth will become uninhabitable as a result of the nuclear fallout and the humans will be forced to set up space stations far away from the earth to escape its impact. Also, there is a chance of the humans trying to settle in other planets, such as Mars.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 540
May 25, 2017, 03:56:33 PM
If nuclear war will happen they maybe earth will become flat like what others belief rolf.. Im not insulting them but i believe on war also those ignorance leader who will always wanted to proved there power to the world with killing those innocent people who don't know about war or what really is going on.
sr. member
Activity: 300
Merit: 250
May 25, 2017, 03:16:27 PM
well, world war 3 will happen. And when it comes, people will use rock and stick to fight in the world war 4. Therefore, we should avoid the war as much as we can all the human will be elimiated
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 25, 2017, 10:44:08 AM
I think more casualties compared to the last wars would happen here.

No. I think that the opposite is going to happen. Back then in the 1940s, the life expectancy was quite low, and the couples were having 7-8 children each. So even if someone died as a soldier, few people cared. But that is not the situation now.
Yes, but back than people did not have weapon of mass destruction, and other things that people have now. Today one person can destroy whole city with one push of a button, and i am not talking about nuclear bomb, that is even worst. In 1940s fire power was replaced with number of humans, today one squad can do a job that was done by... let say 100 soldiers back in 1940s.

There are non-nuclear weapons which can wipeout entire cities in a matter of few seconds, such as thermobaric bombs. And every year, more deadlier weapons are being invented.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 506
May 25, 2017, 09:42:13 AM
I think more casualties compared to the last wars would happen here.

No. I think that the opposite is going to happen. Back then in the 1940s, the life expectancy was quite low, and the couples were having 7-8 children each. So even if someone died as a soldier, few people cared. But that is not the situation now.

This is largely untrue. Postmodernism, existencionalism and other movements, that see war akin to apocalypse have roots in previous world wars, that bled Europe dry.

Pre-war Europe was not backwards place but epicenter of the progress with demographics and life expectancy comparable to second world countries (such as Turkey or Mexico) today.

So, I have to disagree this time, Sithara. People care immensely, to the point, that it turned world history upside down.



I still think, that talking about nuclear war is pointless as it would turn northern hemisphere into large moon crater one way or the another. Limited conventional warfare is pointless also as no major power is capable at this time to permanently subdue all its opponents. Not even United States has the power to win conventional war against everybody else - and no reason to attempt it either.

So, we will see many local wars where different cultures clash. Power balance will continue to shift, but no global war is on horizon. Because no major players could either justify the costs or hope, that the victory lasts.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 257
May 25, 2017, 05:24:41 AM
I think more casualties compared to the last wars would happen here.

No. I think that the opposite is going to happen. Back then in the 1940s, the life expectancy was quite low, and the couples were having 7-8 children each. So even if someone died as a soldier, few people cared. But that is not the situation now.
Yes, but back than people did not have weapon of mass destruction, and other things that people have now. Today one person can destroy whole city with one push of a button, and i am not talking about nuclear bomb, that is even worst. In 1940s fire power was replaced with number of humans, today one squad can do a job that was done by... let say 100 soldiers back in 1940s.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 25, 2017, 03:16:43 AM
I think more casualties compared to the last wars would happen here.

No. I think that the opposite is going to happen. Back then in the 1940s, the life expectancy was quite low, and the couples were having 7-8 children each. So even if someone died as a soldier, few people cared. But that is not the situation now.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Dijual
May 25, 2017, 02:35:50 AM
I think more casualties compared to the last wars would happen here. These days the mind set of people are not serious on wars. People want soldiers for benefits but not all offcourse. Many people has still no idea when war's gonna happen and most soldiers played online games. So whats the gamble? WW3 will ba wars on nuclear and hacking each countries precious secrets.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 272
May 24, 2017, 04:56:30 PM
This is very devastating to us, people. The best thing for us to evade this is to pray hard. This kind of cases should not be tolerated. During world war 2 I've heard the story of my grandmother almost everyday the only food they ate is only a bread. And I dont want everyone to suffer it. Its so hard we should imagine the outcome of this before going to war, every leader should mind these things-> treasure(economy), people, and their lands.
That we can talk about the future or about a possible third world war if the availability of nuclear weapons on the planet has already reached from those quantities that can destroy the entire planet and after that there is no point in talking about the 3 world war.
Why do you think that the third world war may not start with nuclear weapons? You don't think you can fight conventional weapons? A nuclear weapon allows you to seize their territory. Is the war in Syria does not fall under the definition of world war?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 24, 2017, 04:37:54 PM
This is very devastating to us, people. The best thing for us to evade this is to pray hard. This kind of cases should not be tolerated. During world war 2 I've heard the story of my grandmother almost everyday the only food they ate is only a bread. And I dont want everyone to suffer it. Its so hard we should imagine the outcome of this before going to war, every leader should mind these things-> treasure(economy), people, and their lands.
That we can talk about the future or about a possible third world war if the availability of nuclear weapons on the planet has already reached from those quantities that can destroy the entire planet and after that there is no point in talking about the 3 world war.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 251
May 24, 2017, 01:26:14 AM
This is very devastating to us, people. The best thing for us to evade this is to pray hard. This kind of cases should not be tolerated. During world war 2 I've heard the story of my grandmother almost everyday the only food they ate is only a bread. And I dont want everyone to suffer it. Its so hard we should imagine the outcome of this before going to war, every leader should mind these things-> treasure(economy), people, and their lands.
newbie
Activity: 228
Merit: 0
May 24, 2017, 01:04:21 AM
England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

This is ridiculous! England is not even a super-power. Their armed forces are not even capable of defeating third world nations such as Nigeria or Pakistan. Even if they are having the nukes, what will they do with them? They don't have any ICBMs.

Yes, that England should win must happen a miracle. The presence of nuclear weapons is not an indicator of strength.
Yes I really agree with you

Nuclear weapons are not all of them

There are many more technological weapons.
The English country can not make world war 3 only by nuclear only.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 23, 2017, 08:58:11 PM
I think superpowers accumulate atomic bombs as an element of dissuasion, not really to use them. Nowadays the scenario of a nuclear war seems unlikely because it would take the world to the apocalypse. Even when anti-missile shields have been developed, it would only take 1% to fail for a global disaster to occur. Current atomic bombs are much more powerful than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The one of Hiroshima was of 15 kilotones, the one of Nagasaki of 21 kilotones. Today there is Castle Bravo of 15,000 kilotones and the Tsar Bomb of 50000 kilotons. In this graph you can see the comparison based on the nuclear fungus that these bombs produce.

You are right about the potency of the modern nuclear weapons. For example, Tsar Bomba is having a blast radius of around 35 km. Probably, anyone living within the 100 km to 200km radius of the epicenter has very little chance of survival.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
May 23, 2017, 06:37:43 PM
The largest nuclear power in the United States. Russia from her behind. But I think that there is no difference if the potential of both these countries will be enough to several times destroy the whole earth. I'm sure that nuclear war will not be as it is impossible to win.

That is wrong. Russia is having more number of nuclear weapons and nuclear-tipped ICMBs when compared to the United States. The other nations such as China are far behind.

I think superpowers accumulate atomic bombs as an element of dissuasion, not really to use them. Nowadays the scenario of a nuclear war seems unlikely because it would take the world to the apocalypse. Even when anti-missile shields have been developed, it would only take 1% to fail for a global disaster to occur. Current atomic bombs are much more powerful than those that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The one of Hiroshima was of 15 kilotones, the one of Nagasaki of 21 kilotones. Today there is Castle Bravo of 15,000 kilotones and the Tsar Bomb of 50000 kilotons. In this graph you can see the comparison based on the nuclear fungus that these bombs produce.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
May 22, 2017, 08:38:18 PM
In my opinion, the World War 3 will be fought by the NATO against the Russia-China alliance. Even a few days back, China created unnecessary tensions in the South China sea region.
In the world there are so many local conflicts that affect the interests of superpowers that in passing you think about the fact that really the Third World War is not far off. If you really want to know what will happen next, you just need to look at the leaders of the country and their state. You correctly named such countries as China, Russia and the US Well, a significant role Putin But steal in all this situation, Syria and North Korea.

North Korea is very unpredictable. And the leader of this country is strange. It seems to me that the Third World War will begin because of the conflict of this country with some other.

A conflict involving North Korea will not deteriorate in to a world war. If a war happens, then they will be on their own. No one will come to their rescue, including China and Russia.
Pages:
Jump to: