World War 3 - page 5. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Netnox

legendary

Activity: 2044

Merit: 1008

Quote from: ecnalubma on June 12, 2017, 06:04:15 AM

World war 3 will also include massive cyber attacks and hacking wars. Some countries are employing army of hackers in preparation for this kind of warfare.

If that is the case, then be prepared to live without internet. Grin

How can a particular country prevent hacking attack by the outsiders? Should they cut the internet connection to the other countries, and restrict the access within that nation? But even this won't be fail proof. There can be foreign spies and hackers residing in that particular nation.

Proton2233

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

Quote from: Sithara007 on June 12, 2017, 01:57:07 AM

Quote from: matchi2011 on June 06, 2017, 04:06:18 AM

If a single country used nukes at the start of a great war, everyone who has access to nukes would follow suit. Though i don't think england would be the first one to do this and hopefully no country would be stupid enough to initiate a nuclear attack. A nuclear warfare would mean almost extinction level disaster for everyone.

I guess the most powerful nuclear weapons have a blast radius of less than 100km. So a nuclear warfare doesn't automatically mean the end of all forms of life on this planet, at least for the short term. But in the long term, survival will be difficult, provided how quickly the radiation spreads through air and water.

This is only a theory. The Japanese survived after the nuclear bombings, and Chernobyl disaster. There are many people who never left the area of infection and safely live there still. Animals are also great feeling in there. The effect of radiation is still too poorly understood to speak of the destruction on the planet.

ecnalubma

sr. member

Activity: 1526

Merit: 420

World war 3 will also include massive cyber attacks and hacking wars. Some countries are employing army of hackers in preparation for this kind of warfare.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1344

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: matchi2011 on June 06, 2017, 04:06:18 AM

If a single country used nukes at the start of a great war, everyone who has access to nukes would follow suit. Though i don't think england would be the first one to do this and hopefully no country would be stupid enough to initiate a nuclear attack. A nuclear warfare would mean almost extinction level disaster for everyone.

I guess the most powerful nuclear weapons have a blast radius of less than 100km. So a nuclear warfare doesn't automatically mean the end of all forms of life on this planet, at least for the short term. But in the long term, survival will be difficult, provided how quickly the radiation spreads through air and water.

2econd

full member

Activity: 243

Merit: 100

Sure there will be nukes!

matchi2011

sr. member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 267

Buy $BGL before it's too late!

Quote from: Bytecoin101 on May 02, 2017, 01:26:07 AM

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

If a single country used nukes at the start of a great war, everyone who has access to nukes would follow suit. Though i don't think england would be the first one to do this and hopefully no country would be stupid enough to initiate a nuclear attack. A nuclear warfare would mean almost extinction level disaster for everyone.

Okurkabinladin

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 506

Quote from: Sithara007 on June 05, 2017, 09:07:36 PM

Quote from: joebrook on June 05, 2017, 05:34:34 PM

England seem to forget that without the help of USA, They are completely helpless, they may start the war but i doubt they will have the power and weapons to end it with help, Even the USA needed help in Afghanistan.

Yes.. decades of cost cutting measures have left the British Armed Forces as a toothless organization incapable of waging a war against well equipped armies. Without the USAF, they will find it difficult.

And who exactly would start war with United Kingdom first? Ze Germans?

Much like North Korea or Unted States, UK has massive deterrent in form of sea and nuclear arsenal. So there are only two options for conflict.

1. Civil war.

2. Starting more wars on foreign soil.

I belive the second option is undesirable Wink

the former doesnt really call for a strong army, since its weapons would end up on both sides of th war. Like in Syria or Yugo.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1344

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: joebrook on June 05, 2017, 05:34:34 PM

England seem to forget that without the help of USA, They are completely helpless, they may start the war but i doubt they will have the power and weapons to end it with help, Even the USA needed help in Afghanistan.

Yes.. decades of cost cutting measures have left the British Armed Forces as a toothless organization incapable of waging a war against well equipped armies. Without the USAF, they will find it difficult.

darklus123

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 588

Quote from: seo11 on June 05, 2017, 03:19:44 AM

I believe the ww3 will not being allowed to use nukes, that will destroy the world and ruined the entire ecosystem.

Lol are you going to tell the other countries to not use any nukes because it can destroy your county? Seriously? Isnt it obvious that if you are their enemy their main purpose is to destroy your country and your people

joebrook

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 259

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Sithara007 on May 02, 2017, 01:42:52 AM

Quote from: Bytecoin101 on May 02, 2017, 01:26:07 AM

England Said they will use nuclear weapons to its enemies.
Everyone knows the consequences of a nuclear war.

Vote Now!

This is ridiculous! England is not even a super-power. Their armed forces are not even capable of defeating third world nations such as Nigeria or Pakistan. Even if they are having the nukes, what will they do with them? They don't have any ICBMs.

England seem to forget that without the help of USA, They are completely helpless, they may start the war but i doubt they will have the power and weapons to end it with help, Even the USA needed help in Afghanistan.

hovrah

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Quote from: Proton2233 on June 05, 2017, 11:35:42 AM

Quote from: Sithara007 on June 04, 2017, 10:09:20 PM

Quote from: hovrah on June 04, 2017, 11:54:48 AM

Very interesting question regarding the third world war. The fact is that if you look at all the military conflicts that are happening now and then Who is involved in them, clearly one can come to the conclusion that all these wars will not end so quickly yet. If you pay attention to Syria and even to North Korea, you can definitely say which countries will be the culprits of the 3rd World War

North Korea is not going to attack anyone. Their's is just empty talk. Let's focus our attention on Syria. It is true that most of the world powers are involved in Syria. But their involvement is limited to air-strikes and training. So the Syrian conflict also is not going to escalate in to a world war.

This is incorrect. Syria is already a world war. The price of oil is low and likely to decline further. Russia is not interested in a stable situation in Syria. This can significantly reduce the volume of sales of Russian hydrocarbons to Europe. So they will do everything so that the world did not come in Syria.

Today in the world very much heated atmosphere and can flash all at any minute. We see interference in the internal affairs of different countries, both Russia and the United States of America, and how this can end can be foreseen. As they say, we ourselves will be guilty of destroying ourselves.

Proton2233

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 252

Quote from: Sithara007 on June 04, 2017, 10:09:20 PM

Quote from: hovrah on June 04, 2017, 11:54:48 AM

Very interesting question regarding the third world war. The fact is that if you look at all the military conflicts that are happening now and then Who is involved in them, clearly one can come to the conclusion that all these wars will not end so quickly yet. If you pay attention to Syria and even to North Korea, you can definitely say which countries will be the culprits of the 3rd World War

North Korea is not going to attack anyone. Their's is just empty talk. Let's focus our attention on Syria. It is true that most of the world powers are involved in Syria. But their involvement is limited to air-strikes and training. So the Syrian conflict also is not going to escalate in to a world war.

This is incorrect. Syria is already a world war. The price of oil is low and likely to decline further. Russia is not interested in a stable situation in Syria. This can significantly reduce the volume of sales of Russian hydrocarbons to Europe. So they will do everything so that the world did not come in Syria.

seo11

member

Activity: 64

Merit: 10

I believe the ww3 will not being allowed to use nukes, that will destroy the world and ruined the entire ecosystem. Lyrics Fed

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1344

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: hovrah on June 04, 2017, 11:54:48 AM

Very interesting question regarding the third world war. The fact is that if you look at all the military conflicts that are happening now and then Who is involved in them, clearly one can come to the conclusion that all these wars will not end so quickly yet. If you pay attention to Syria and even to North Korea, you can definitely say which countries will be the culprits of the 3rd World War

North Korea is not going to attack anyone. Their's is just empty talk. Let's focus our attention on Syria. It is true that most of the world powers are involved in Syria. But their involvement is limited to air-strikes and training. So the Syrian conflict also is not going to escalate in to a world war.

whaawh

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 251

Quote from: criptix on June 04, 2017, 01:10:11 PM

Quote from: ridery99 on June 03, 2017, 01:55:34 AM

Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the elite need world war 3 so that they can reduce population to their planned goal. under Trump their plan has been put on hold for a while.

You are a real sheeple.

Trump wants the global temp too increase. That means higher water level. That means the basis for life of hundred millions of people will be destroyed.
Trump wants to stop immigration. That means death for the refugees.

That is a good plan for reduction of the human population.

500 million means 2% of the smartest (= ~140 million) + 7% of the best workers (= ~350 million).

No one will ever reach a balance with nature, and this too. Following the example of how migrants try to break the balance of life in some country. Thus, the migration services try at least a little to restore order. We see very strongly What happens in Europe because of migrants and would not want such a problem to occur in the United States.

criptix

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1145

Quote from: ridery99 on June 03, 2017, 01:55:34 AM

Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the elite need world war 3 so that they can reduce population to their planned goal. under Trump their plan has been put on hold for a while.

You are a real sheeple.

Trump wants the global temp too increase. That means higher water level. That means the basis for life of hundred millions of people will be destroyed.
Trump wants to stop immigration. That means death for the refugees.

That is a good plan for reduction of the human population.

500 million means 2% of the smartest (= ~140 million) + 7% of the best workers (= ~350 million).

hovrah

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Very interesting question regarding the third world war. The fact is that if you look at all the military conflicts that are happening now and then Who is involved in them, clearly one can come to the conclusion that all these wars will not end so quickly yet. If you pay attention to Syria and even to North Korea, you can definitely say which countries will be the culprits of the 3rd World War

SinLinJim

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 101

Quote from: Sithara007 on June 03, 2017, 10:50:27 PM

Quote from: ridery99 on June 03, 2017, 01:55:34 AM

Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the elite need world war 3 so that they can reduce population to their planned goal. under Trump their plan has been put on hold for a while.

The main aim of Hillary and Soros is to create unrest in the world, there by increasing the defense sales. A part of the profits directly goes to these guys, and it is in their interest to create new wars and conflicts in the globe.

It turns out that the most interested people in the wars are the leaders of the countries. So I completely agree with you that if the Third World War begins it will be a very strong interest of the leaders of the major countries of the world.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3220

Merit: 1344

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ridery99 on June 03, 2017, 01:55:34 AM

Hillary Clinton, George Soros and the elite need world war 3 so that they can reduce population to their planned goal. under Trump their plan has been put on hold for a while.

The main aim of Hillary and Soros is to create unrest in the world, there by increasing the defense sales. A part of the profits directly goes to these guys, and it is in their interest to create new wars and conflicts in the globe.

Sadlife

sr. member

Activity: 1400

Merit: 269

Actually war is happening in many different countries fir example in the middle where millions of people are getting and nobody even cares even Pope francis, WHO, Human rights and other international community. What is happening in the middle east i think there is some political agenda occurring behind the scenes, all those countries in the middle east: libya, Afghanistan, syria all there leaders has been turned into an evil dictator that's being news in US mainstream media's. What is the US government objective in these countries, well first of all the middle east is rich in oil which has a good value in the world market that's the elites are attempting to control this countries which they have successfully done.

Topic: World War 3 - page 5. (Read 13245 times)