Pages:
Author

Topic: Would you eat a human? - page 65. (Read 81757 times)

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
December 05, 2016, 12:36:54 PM

Yes, but he disnt specify in what situation. Killing a human to eat him is wrong, yes, but eating a human to survive doesn't have to be.

This thread separates 'the diner' from 'the dinner' about two weeks after the failure of the transportation systems servicing the major centers of population here in the U.S..  And in most of the 'civilized' world for that matter.

Actually it probably does not.  I suspect that there will be no particular correlation between what people spout out on this thread and what their actions in actual practice might be.

It's a pretty fair bet that every one of us alive today owe our existence to survival cannibalism practiced among our ancestors.  In the case of many of our East Asian peers, tracing the tree back only a small integer number of generations would be sufficient to find it.

hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 564
Need some spare btc for a new PC
December 05, 2016, 11:55:18 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.

As I understand the question was "would you eat a human", dont "would you kill a human to eat his meat"
If we imaging the situation like this: people at open sea and someone died (natural death not killing). And there is no any food exept the leather boots and maybe these people at the boats ask themselves "Would we eat a human that already died?" Its a survive to eat a human at this situation
and Who knows how each of us can do at same situation because now our  life are in safety


Yes, but he disnt specify in what situation. Killing a human to eat him is wrong, yes, but eating a human to survive doesn't have to be.

Well i think both of it is wrong. Killing people is litteraly wrong and eating people is also wrong because sort of you are just eating also your body but from the other person because you know it is the same. It is really disgusting about it. Eating people? Yucks! But there are people want to eat human though!

"litteraly wrong" would you kill Hitler if you had a chance to go back in time?
"eating people is also wrong because sort of you are just eating also your body but from the other person because you know it is the same" so the muscles from pig, cow, dog, cat, human, etc.. aren't the same thing? Some may be the different structure but basically are the same. So why is eating cats and dogs frowned upon but eating pigs and cows ain't? Because it's socially acceptable.

http://www.themost10.com/most-cannibalistic-animals/
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 05, 2016, 11:54:16 AM
They sell guns to the retarded to make wars and kill people.

You don't need to bother about it. It is called natural selection. I have a feeling that intelligent people are having less number of children right now, where as the retarded are having a population boom. This is nature's way to reduce the burden of the retards.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1174
December 05, 2016, 11:29:06 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.

As I understand the question was "would you eat a human", dont "would you kill a human to eat his meat"
If we imaging the situation like this: people at open sea and someone died (natural death not killing). And there is no any food exept the leather boots and maybe these people at the boats ask themselves "Would we eat a human that already died?" Its a survive to eat a human at this situation
and Who knows how each of us can do at same situation because now our  life are in safety


Yes, but he disnt specify in what situation. Killing a human to eat him is wrong, yes, but eating a human to survive doesn't have to be.

Well i think both of it is wrong. Killing people is litteraly wrong and eating people is also wrong because sort of you are just eating also your body but from the other person because you know it is the same. It is really disgusting about it. Eating people? Yucks! But there are people want to eat human though!
It is wrong but we do wrong things to survive. If I were in an accident and the only way to survive would be to eat a dead corpse I'd do it. I refuse to sit and wait for death and I'm sure many people would act in a similar way. After all meat is just meat. We eat cute fluffy rabbits and we eat dirty pigs that smell like shit and all of them taste good.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 505
December 05, 2016, 09:16:10 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.

As I understand the question was "would you eat a human", dont "would you kill a human to eat his meat"
If we imaging the situation like this: people at open sea and someone died (natural death not killing). And there is no any food exept the leather boots and maybe these people at the boats ask themselves "Would we eat a human that already died?" Its a survive to eat a human at this situation
and Who knows how each of us can do at same situation because now our  life are in safety


Yes, but he disnt specify in what situation. Killing a human to eat him is wrong, yes, but eating a human to survive doesn't have to be.

Well i think both of it is wrong. Killing people is litteraly wrong and eating people is also wrong because sort of you are just eating also your body but from the other person because you know it is the same. It is really disgusting about it. Eating people? Yucks! But there are people want to eat human though!
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 564
Need some spare btc for a new PC
December 05, 2016, 08:48:29 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.

As I understand the question was "would you eat a human", dont "would you kill a human to eat his meat"
If we imaging the situation like this: people at open sea and someone died (natural death not killing). And there is no any food exept the leather boots and maybe these people at the boats ask themselves "Would we eat a human that already died?" Its a survive to eat a human at this situation
and Who knows how each of us can do at same situation because now our  life are in safety


Yes, but he disnt specify in what situation. Killing a human to eat him is wrong, yes, but eating a human to survive doesn't have to be.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 252
Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange
December 05, 2016, 07:34:38 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.

As I understand the question was "would you eat a human", dont "would you kill a human to eat his meat"
If we imaging the situation like this: people at open sea and someone died (natural death not killing). And there is no any food exept the leather boots and maybe these people at the boats ask themselves "Would we eat a human that already died?" Its a survive to eat a human at this situation
and Who knows how each of us can do at same situation because now our  life are in safety
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
December 04, 2016, 05:20:25 PM
On a day to day basis, no. But if I was in a desert no food, saw someone dead then maybe but 100% no otherwise.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
December 04, 2016, 04:24:16 PM
Hahha wtf...
I would eat lol hahahah

Really laughing at loud atm..
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 04, 2016, 01:17:30 PM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?Cry
 Wink

See these people



To survive they do whatever is within reach of them, if you are in the same situation as him or in a worse situation than him.  you will eat another person. See what rich countries makes to continue to sustain their good lives:



They sell guns to the retarded to make wars and kill people.

hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 564
Need some spare btc for a new PC
December 04, 2016, 12:28:16 PM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink

no, it's the "how strong your primal will to survive is". It's different to kill a man and eat him just because, from eating a dead man to survive.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 252
Buy/Sell crypto at BestChange
December 04, 2016, 10:52:46 AM
Before ask this question you should ask: "How deep you know your dark soul..?"  Cry
 Wink
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 04, 2016, 08:15:41 AM
A dude survived on mars planting potatoes in his own shit for months man.

For some people here, human shit is more "ethical" to eat when compared to human meat. Not me. Given a choice, I would select human meat anytime of the day (dead humans, obviously).
copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
December 04, 2016, 03:56:15 AM
If you are stuck with an 18 year old and extremely beautiful girl, wouldn't you just eat her from head to toe?
No jokes though that there are people and were and will be who are eating other people for living and sometimes for sport.
Hannibal(TV Series) anyone there, hello? he made a dude to eat his own leg lolz and had such taste and skills in cooking.

Why would you even want to live after killing someone for food just to survive? survive to do  what exactly? just die a decent death already, or maybe dig the ground to find mammals and worms.
A dude survived on mars planting potatoes in his own shit for months man.
sr. member
Activity: 382
Merit: 250
December 04, 2016, 03:32:40 AM
Theoretically there can human flesh. The only difference is that the animal meat is safer because there is little enough contact common pathogens. Human meat requires long heat treatment to eliminate certain potential pathogens.

You mean kinda like dog's meat that even under the 100 degree of boiling water, its micro bacteria aren't going to die sooner unless its reaches 300 degrees?   Grin I think human flesh can be soften in less than an hour of boiling water.
Modern meat industry stuffs animal before killing, a lot of different chemicals, and it is growth stimulants, and all sorts of vaccinations, as long as it tolstel and grew fat. So, what it is not yet known, whose meat is poisonous, human or pig or dogs.
sr. member
Activity: 338
Merit: 250
December 04, 2016, 03:26:20 AM
NEVER, its so disgusting even in a survival situation I wouldn't do that
sr. member
Activity: 1638
Merit: 300
December 04, 2016, 03:14:03 AM
Some psychologists say that the works of human meat is addictive. They are based on the fact that some well- known serial killers ganibaly after treatment in a mental hospital, returning to the murders and noedaniyu human flesh, as to abandon this could not.
wow, thanks for that information bro, it is really gross. If human meat is really "addictive"? So there are really humans that eat humans, right? Like how would they know that human meat is addictive if they do not know what it takes like. Maybe some psychologists really taste human meat. Or they have patients that is been eating human meat and they have asked about it.
full member
Activity: 187
Merit: 100
December 04, 2016, 02:52:18 AM
Some psychologists say that the works of human meat is addictive. They are based on the fact that some well- known serial killers ganibaly after treatment in a mental hospital, returning to the murders and noedaniyu human flesh, as to abandon this could not.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1041
December 04, 2016, 02:06:09 AM
Theoretically there can human flesh. The only difference is that the animal meat is safer because there is little enough contact common pathogens. Human meat requires long heat treatment to eliminate certain potential pathogens.

You mean kinda like dog's meat that even under the 100 degree of boiling water, its micro bacteria aren't going to die sooner unless its reaches 300 degrees?   Grin I think human flesh can be soften in less than an hour of boiling water.
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
December 04, 2016, 01:56:52 AM
Theoretically there can human flesh. The only difference is that the animal meat is safer because there is little enough contact common pathogens. Human meat requires long heat treatment to eliminate certain potential pathogens.
Pages:
Jump to: