How is anyone even claiming this is a bad return. Seat is worth 0.002 and collected 0.00041002 in two years so about 20% (future yield may be lower ofc). What's the problem exactly? Trolls gonna troll.
If you would like statistics that aren't skewed, you can check out the following page that was created over the course of around a year:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180825232210/http://minifrij.com/nasty/Assuming that the return is linear over the year (which it wouldn't be) and the return is on one seat (which it absolutely isn't), the return halved is around 0.00020501. Compared to the price of a seat around one year ago, 0.0077
BTC, the return is closer to 2.5%. Not that this is accurate whatsoever though, as the reward given is a result of multiple seats, therefore meaning the percentage return is significantly lower.
Regarding the sale price of a seat alone, in USD (as Og loves to reference), you would have made more than double your money by just keeping the BTC used at this point (and up to 3x more over the course of the last year), rather than buying the seat over a year.
Now, if those aren't returns worth creaming yourself over, what is?
I have no intention of replying to anyone over this, the statistics are there for anyone to see and figure out. If you expect me to answer anything, don't hold your breath.
The balances weren't much, but the coins still look gorgeous!
