I'll be sending a donation shortly, as soon as my wallet syncs. I've only got a 7950 (5.045MHs) and 7990 (12.65 MHs). I gained 7.2 MHs overall. I'll be sending 0.003 BTC as a donation now (3 days extra profits), and possibly more in the future. Also, Wolf0's official version gets me 1% more speed than the leaked one.
@Wolf0 any chance of getting a Cape Verde X11 version?
edit: Donation sent
Topic: X11 X13 X15 with 50% more hashrate 7Mh/s on 280x or 10 Mh/s on 290x - page 7. (Read 54262 times)
December 02, 2014, 11:24:06 AM
December 02, 2014, 11:19:17 AM
I've had a lot of people approach me asking when the community funded GPU optimisation project is starting, they wanted to donate.
It just might work.
It just might work.
December 02, 2014, 10:59:42 AM
I get some
[16:59:00] Rejected 0250b0ee Diff 0.432/0.040 GPU 4 (Share above target.)
[16:59:00] Rejected 0250b0ee Diff 0.432/0.040 GPU 4 (Share above target.)
December 02, 2014, 10:55:14 AM
@wolf0
what coin is that address wolf0 BTC/DRK or what
what coin is that address wolf0 BTC/DRK or what
December 02, 2014, 10:51:32 AM
If you're going to use my shit, you may as well get it from me, not that bottom feeder. These are faster by a bit; I'll release Pitcairn in a little while to prove I'm the actual author, since Eliovp didn't have a bin for Pitcairn, nor up-to-date source to generate one.
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-x11Tahitigw64l8ku0.bin
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-x11Hawaiigw64l8ku0.bin
Same deal, use SGMiner 5 to generate a bin using worksize 64, then copy this bin over it with the same name.
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-x11Tahitigw64l8ku0.bin
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/wolf-x11Hawaiigw64l8ku0.bin
Same deal, use SGMiner 5 to generate a bin using worksize 64, then copy this bin over it with the same name.
My file name is darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0, yours is l8, can I copy that l8 file?
December 02, 2014, 10:36:04 AM
Nice.
R9 280x(tahiti): 6.450MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
9970(tahiti): 5,9MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
6990(Caymang): 4,1MHASH at standard clocks. with 2 threads
With 8 threads the rig is crashing.
Donation is comming tomorrow.
R9 280x(tahiti): 6.450MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
9970(tahiti): 5,9MHASH at standard clocks. with 4 threads
6990(Caymang): 4,1MHASH at standard clocks. with 2 threads
With 8 threads the rig is crashing.
Donation is comming tomorrow.
December 02, 2014, 10:25:09 AM
I sent some satoshis to this address: 1Jp2R7dF9gYr872FkXiap2MaYaHNEfwWhZ
It is not a lot, some bottles of beer
, but that is all what i can do now.
It is my fake account, i doesn't want to show my main acc for some reasons.
Recently i did smth at this forum, it was opensource, and i had a donation address and i thankful for all who donated. But for most of people opensource == free. Sad, but true.
I just hope that in the future, may be month, may be in a year, you will write an article about your optimisations. I and others will appreciate it.
Sorry for my mistakes.
It is not a lot, some bottles of beer
, but that is all what i can do now.It is my fake account, i doesn't want to show my main acc for some reasons.
Recently i did smth at this forum, it was opensource, and i had a donation address and i thankful for all who donated. But for most of people opensource == free. Sad, but true.
I just hope that in the future, may be month, may be in a year, you will write an article about your optimisations. I and others will appreciate it.
Sorry for my mistakes.
December 02, 2014, 09:46:57 AM
please donate to wolf,
im setting up a pool to automaticaly give a % to wolf , multipool , profit port
im setting up a pool to automaticaly give a % to wolf , multipool , profit port
December 02, 2014, 08:36:41 AM
well for starters, why the fuck did he get a version ?
so leak was 100% sure, if you sell soemthing to 1 guy your sure he will be a gready fuck and try to fuck you over.
first mistake was wolf sending 1 guy the source for reasons i ignore, the rest is human nature.
also says alot about the guy as we know who it is,
now for the rest of you , well, the idiot just fucked up, since now diff will rize fast and all this be useless...
so i guess we can stop this thread now
To be honest, that's why I am reluctant to even sell day zero algo... because we all know that someone will try to resell it (even if it is a crappy exe...)so leak was 100% sure, if you sell soemthing to 1 guy your sure he will be a gready fuck and try to fuck you over.
first mistake was wolf sending 1 guy the source for reasons i ignore, the rest is human nature.
also says alot about the guy as we know who it is,
now for the rest of you , well, the idiot just fucked up, since now diff will rize fast and all this be useless...
so i guess we can stop this thread now
actually the best way to operate is to do like primegpu, release the soft with a licence number attached to a specific hardware... (but we can't get further away from open-source
), personnally I would even add something to make it revocable, in case he tries to temper with it... and that would be a lot of pain to develop... (far away of anybody interest in the field, which is still algorithmic as far as I am concerned...)
November 30, 2014, 07:09:53 PM
That's why I'm hating on miners. Not because they don't donate, which is kind of shitty, but because they seem to feel entitled to someone else's work for free, as evidenced by the above.
Don't want to start preaching, but you use sgminer, linux, darkwallet, firefox etc.
How much did you pay for those? Did you donate? (Did I?)
I don't feel entitled to it, though; I'm thankful that they released it. Had they chosen not to, I wouldn't have told them they were shit people and hated on them.
Wolf0 nobody told you you're shit. At least not that I'm aware of.
Read back in the SGMiner thread; I got plenty of hate early on.
December 02, 2014, 08:21:47 AM
well for starters, why the fuck did he get a version ?
so leak was 100% sure, if you sell soemthing to 1 guy your sure he will be a gready fuck and try to fuck you over.
first mistake was wolf sending 1 guy the source for reasons i ignore, the rest is human nature.
also says alot about the guy as we know who it is,
now for the rest of you , well, the idiot just fucked up, since now diff will rize fast and all this be useless...
so i guess we can stop this thread now
so leak was 100% sure, if you sell soemthing to 1 guy your sure he will be a gready fuck and try to fuck you over.
first mistake was wolf sending 1 guy the source for reasons i ignore, the rest is human nature.
also says alot about the guy as we know who it is,
now for the rest of you , well, the idiot just fucked up, since now diff will rize fast and all this be useless...
so i guess we can stop this thread now
December 02, 2014, 08:16:23 AM
sooner or later anyway someone spit 
December 02, 2014, 07:51:28 AM
Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_-
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
Don't worry, we don't expect a lot, but yourself don't expect anything which could be profitable to you... also don't complain when a gpu dev rape a new coin... as we don't expect anything from you there is no reason to share with you (ie: in that case you are just the competition...) and in that case, we will just release new stuff when it has become unprofitable to us... (well it is a lose-lose situation... but more for you than for us in the no-donation basis). The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
I think you don't understand the implication (for you) of what you wrote...
Because we really don't have to share anything at all...
November 30, 2014, 06:42:01 PM
That's why I'm hating on miners. Not because they don't donate, which is kind of shitty, but because they seem to feel entitled to someone else's work for free, as evidenced by the above.
Don't want to start preaching, but you use sgminer, linux, darkwallet, firefox etc.
How much did you pay for those? Did you donate? (Did I?)
I don't feel entitled to it, though; I'm thankful that they released it. Had they chosen not to, I wouldn't have told them they were shit people and hated on them.
December 02, 2014, 06:09:20 AM
I am inserting the kernels in sgminer 5.0 (in the kernels folder) and I am also copying bin files in the main sgminer folder.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak.
If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours.
Hope that others think the same as i do.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak.
If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours.
Hope that others think the same as i do.
Use worksize 64, generate bins by yourself, then replace those bins with mine, using the same name as the ones you generated.
Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_-
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
Actually, it was my main source of income, and releasing it with a fee would have caused the same thing - someone taking it apart and ripping out the code. Dude, you don't even look at history before spouting your bullshit. Go look into the history of darkcoin-mod, and what this "community" will do to avoid paying even a 2% fee on a 50% increase.
EDIT: Oh, and by the way, you're correct that donations aren't required. But don't you dare bitch when people only sell to large farmers when you never donated a cent.
Thanks for the help. It works now 5.9 on 7950 @ 1100/1600
December 02, 2014, 04:39:22 AM
Yup and imagine that, a highly desirable product has now been leaked and is pretty much worthless to the author. Too bad you didn't release it with a modest dev fee attached. Instead people got pissed off you were trying to sell it for so much that they don't even consider it a option and there are people trying to resell it themselves for less or outright leaked it. But don't worry, I'm sure no one would've used your custom miner. -_-
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
The problem may-be is that you forgot to donate for sgminer while you should have. Same applies to standard sgminer, someone wrap up the code
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
expecting from users they will donate... he was wrong, some moron thought they didn't have to make donations
Donations ARE NOT required. They are given of their free will. What you're talking about is a fee and someone not paying a fee. Don't confuse the two. Donations are not the same as a fee. You are happy if you get donations, if any. Fees are required to purchase a product.
Don't go on bitching about something like this when you could put a dev fee in. It's your own fault if you feel you deserve money for work for 'donating' it. NO ONE HAS TO DONATE. Donation expectations should be set at 0.
December 02, 2014, 04:05:34 AM
I am inserting the kernels in sgminer 5.0 (in the kernels folder) and I am also copying bin files in the main sgminer folder.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak.
If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours.
Hope that others think the same as i do.
Then i run -k darkcoin-mod, no change in hash rate . What am I doing wrong?
@ wolf0 , dont say that i did not predict the leak.
If you make a kernel/miner with good hashrate and a reasonable donate option I will use yours.
Hope that others think the same as i do.
December 01, 2014, 08:28:10 PM
There's no way to tell 100% from the bin files, but you couldn't have known mine were far smaller than the shit code unless you had one - it's a little old, but your hashrates are also correct. Someone has stolen from me.
Well seems this has been in the wild for a while. File modification date is Nov 18th. Anyway you're also invited for a lunch. We can discuss X11 and "other things in littérature"
December 01, 2014, 08:13:44 PM
Oh, goody. Now I might have to go kill someone. It could be an old version of mine - narrows the culprit down.
here is copypaste from my so called management dashboard: you can guess the cards by their respective hash rates except the first one @ 720kH/s which is an old 5770 I used for testing.
Row: 1
Rack: 1 Rack: 2 Rack: 3 Rack: 4 Rack: 5
Shelf:1
Name bit.siopti.com
IP-Port bit.siopti.com-4028
Uptime 2w 1d 0h 11m 50s
kH/s 704.2
HW_Errors 0
Pool_Rej% 0.1872
Dev_Rej% 0.1872
Blocks 0
Utility 1.3072
Device Temper Fan kH/s
GPU0 72.0C -1 720.3
Shelf:1
Name coin.siopti.com
IP-Port coin.siopti.com-4028
Host DOWN!
Shelf:1
Name giga.siopti.com
IP-Port giga.siopti.com-4028
Uptime 0w 0d 2h 36m 30s
kH/s 20854.8
HW_Errors 0
Pool_Rej% 0.0957
Dev_Rej% 0.0957
Blocks 0
Utility 40.0136
Device Temper Fan kH/s
GPU0 61.0C 1430 6076.8
GPU1 72.0C 1702 6437.0
GPU2 73.0C 1633 4848.3
GPU3 70.0C 1203 4908.7
Shelf:1
Name lite.siopti.com
IP-Port lite.siopti.com-4028
Uptime 0w 0d 2h 33m 6s
kH/s 17753.4
HW_Errors 0
Pool_Rej% 0.2752
Dev_Rej% 0.2752
Blocks 0
Utility 30.7657
Device Temper Fan kH/s
GPU0 57.0C -1 8683.0
GPU1 58.0C -1 8671.9
Shelf:1
Name mega.siopti.com
IP-Port mega.siopti.com-4028
Uptime 0w 0d 2h 40m 10s
kH/s 18467.9
HW_Errors 0
Pool_Rej% 0.2519
Dev_Rej% 0.2519
Blocks 0
Utility 32.1401
Device Temper Fan kH/s
GPU0 70.0C 1253 6111.6
GPU1 70.0C 1434 6121.0
GPU2 62.0C 1374 6151.5
December 01, 2014, 08:09:21 PM
This is something else indeed. LoveToShare, I would love if you shared some .cl files so that I could compare them with other darkcoin-mod.cl files. BTW did you compile those?
Anyway thanks for sharing...
Also I'm buying lunch if you stop by...
From his screenshot, all he has is some shitty cl and some slightly better bin files that Sabotage probably made himself by tweaking a few options in the stock darkcoin-mod and then tried to sell off as mine.
Looking at bin file size, I'd say they forced some parts of the code not to "unroll" as the whole bin is 1/2 size.
I'd love to look at their .cl to see what they've done.
In the performace side, 7950 is running at 4.9MH/s up from 3.0, 280X is about 6.4 up from 3.9
(on stock clocks. btw I have a problem with trixx and recent amd drivers, namely on 280x i seem to be able to set gpu clock and memclock, but gpu-z still shows stock clocks. Afterburner is even worse. Do you know what's with that?)
and 290X/X2 is at 8.7 per core up from 5.6 all on stock clocks.
Not bat at all I'd say. I will have to setup tomorrow to measure power usage...
Oh, goody. Now I might have to go kill someone. It could be an old version of mine - narrows the culprit down.
Are these yours? Have you looked at the .bin files?
p.s. what's with the Trixx and latest drivers? I cannot seem to be able to set gpu and mem clocks....
Jump to: