The problem of sockpuppet delegates can be solved with antisybil protection.
May be.
But i want to know are devs concerned about this?
Especially when Crypti fans are talking about creating 70 or even 101 voted delegates by one person...
No one has expressed CONCERN over Crypti FANS being able to create 70 or 101 delegates. Creating a delegate is no different than expressing a desire to run for political office...... you need votes. Delegates dont vote. Only the top voted 101 delegates split the forging fees from that last 101 block cycle. Having 50 delegates, and only 5 or so in the top 101 is not a good investment.
Delegates, once formed, are permanent. There is no refund if they go dark. You can sell your delegate privately to another user, but you cant change the passphrase. Would you buy a delegate that had a passphrase known to another user?
The consensus is that the community, knowing that one user has formed 50 delegates, will not vote for those delegates. There was even an excellent suggestion from Eric that we have a "minus" vote available for each node. The community could get together and vote a delegate out of the 101 positions.
Forming a Delegate is not cheap....... we are considering 25000XCR right now. That would be 2.5 million XCR to form 101 delegates. I only know of two people that have that much XCR, but after buying those delegates, their supply of XCR that is available for voting in a node would be greatly diminished.
Also, remember that there is not any forging unless XCR is traded. Hording great amounts of XCR in a node to have a bigger vote only serves to lessen the amount for trading, which lowers the forging fees further.
I dont have any plans to form more than 1 delegate. Max, well, he is a NXT fan. Perhaps he will enlighten us as to his plans.