Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 30. (Read 804672 times)

Well, apparently I'm not alone. I wish I would have realized.

People need to know there is an issue. I'm pretty frustrated now. I've got about 50k of my XCR stuck at Cryptsy and now another 83500 XCR stuck in limbo somewhere on the way to BTER. The only safe place to keep it is apparently my wallet.

I´m a little bit afraid now.
Yesterday I send some XCR to BTER to not only use Poloniex for trading/building.
Fist they are long in Pending at Polo, but it seems, that it leaves polo but don´t arrive at Bter...
Please... don´t tell me, that Btr. is the next Cryptsy 3.0 or Gox. 2.0...
What the hell...
Still waiting for deposit on Bter.....

someting other....
Is there anybody interested into the Domain "Bter.de" ?
I am the owner of it and want to sell this Domainname.

And... of course... No trademark or name rights have been violated - because they don´t exist.
I also accept XCR for Payment and will donate 50% of the selling price to donate XCR DAPP Contest!

I still helping to keep XCR at 1100 min. for days...
XCR is worth much more. I don´t think, that XCR is the ETH of the poor.
I think, XCR is "the DAPP Platform of the easy" in Javascript - Much more than a inflexible ETH who is "infected".
There is much more than the poor... I believe in it.

@Max: How about the Raspi2 ARM Video for forging for Version 4? My Raspi needs to feed with informations.  

Same problem here. Still waiting for answer from Bter. But i presume we ll never see our coins again

Same problem here. Still waiting for answer from Bter. But i presume we ll never see our coins again

Is there a problem at BTER?

I've got a deposit that never showed up. I already asked here once but didn't get a response. BTER keeps telling me they are sorry and they are working on it. However, if I wasn't alone I assume others would be having the same problem.

Thanks

The article makes a statement about the soon to be released Crypti Tokens Dapp. It mistakes our announcement of the dapp as the release, and states that it was "released on 23rd of December", which is incorrect. The dapp is expected to be released in January 2016, as the Crypti Foundation announced in the associated blog post.

James Stallings also makes the claim that Crypti Tokens are "redundant" because they are being integrated into Crypti and not Bitcoin. It is suggested one should use already existing alternatives like Colored Coins. However, the Crypti Foundation stated in the announcement that Crypti Tokens are an easy-to-use alternative for crowdfunds or shares within the Crypti ecosystem.

The Crypti Foundation's main development work lies within the development of the tokens module for Crypti's dapp framework. With the release of Crypti Tokens the module will also be released to allow developers to integrate tokens directly into their dapps. This makes the development of such projects as decentralized exchanges and games with in-game tokens much easier.

Furthermore, the article reference the opinions of two experts, Nathan Wosnack and Eric Grill. These quotations exhibit a lack of awareness of the Crypti technology stack. Their responses were taken out of context several times in the article, as further communication with Wosnack reveals.

Wosnack talks in his quoted test about mining in Crypti's sidechains. Fortunately, Crypti's sidechains do not rely on this method of security. Instead, they are using the ultra fast Delegated-Proof-of-Stake consensus system. Therefore, no further comment on this topic is required, given the inaccuracy of the commentary.

Furthermore, the article poses the question to the reader, "What problem does Crypti Foundation and Crypti Tokens solve that needs solving or hasn't already been solved?" For users who are familiar with Crypti, this question is easily answered, for those who have never heard of Crypti before the question is quickly answered. Crypti provides the world's first framework for Turing complete decentralized applications and custom sidechains programmed in regular JavaScript, making it accessible to millions of developers who are already familiar with this language. Through the integrated Dapp Store and cryptocurrency/token system it is easy for developers to distribute and monetize their applications right after launch. Without even going deeper into Crypti's other features, like enhanced security measurements (2nd Passphrase and Multi-Signature), or its underlying technology (10sec blocktime, blockchain contact book, web wallet), we can say with certainty that Crypti solves many problems, especially for JavaScript developers who want to make their own decentralized applications.

With the title "Unjustified Hype?" the article further describes different token solutions like Colu or Coinprism. These are definitely great examples of technology, and the Crypti Foundation has contacts with their respective development teams. In their present form, however, they are not practical for use by Crypti developers, and fall short of the goals which the Crypti Foundation achieves with the release of its framework module and Crypti Tokens, which goes hand in hand with it.

The other reference in the article, Eric Grill, when asked for his opinion on Crypti Tokens, states Crypti "seem(s) to be a little behind what others have already done" and in the same paragraph says that "there might be something more there" and that he "would need to research it [Crypti] more". The Crypti Foundation consists of experts on the dapp and sidechain technology, and they are well aware of the competition. It can be said without hesitation that Crypti's technology stack is top-notch and is a front-runner among its competitors. With its unique charm and features (especially the friendliness towards JavaScript developers), Crypti is definitely one of the top players, and is moving the technology forward. It's absolutely incomprehensible how the article comes to the conclusion that the Crypti Foundation "aren't doing the blockchain userbase any particular favors".

In the end, the Crypti Foundation comes to the conclusion that James Stallings did poor research on Crypti, and that the article was written with insufficient research. The Crypti Foundation hopes that in the future, CoinTelegraph's journalists treat all blockchain projects with the same consideration, and take the time to conduct sufficient research to do factual reporting. Otherwise, the entire cryptocurrency landscape will be in danger because new innovations will be dismissed too quickly.

Thank you very much!

The Crypti Foundation

Let's try to get that press release out here. Shouldn't take very long ..

almost 600 pages it is a lot to read,can you please tell me best things why is crypti better than  other crypto? for example Vnl : zerotime

almost 600 pages it is a lot to read,can you please tell me best things why is crypti better than  other crypto? for example Vnl : zerotime

I suggest u to do some readings, i heard people are writing things for other people to read it  

why crypti is good ?

Can we please get XCR on Bittrex?