a little disappointed....
I'm actually not. It only proves that devs do they best to get everything worked out well. I'd rather wait for proper working system with fair IPO than invest in something that might become a scam
I'd rather wait too
Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 587. (Read 804702 times)
June 30, 2014, 07:44:47 AM
I'm actually not. It only proves that devs do they best to get everything worked out well. I'd rather wait for proper working system with fair IPO than invest in something that might become a scam
I'd rather wait too
June 30, 2014, 07:26:30 AM
Why I can't type password and login with the Beta version?
June 30, 2014, 07:23:15 AM
Thanks for your responses!
You are really helped us.
We will continue work, i will fix found issues.
If anyone found any mistake, please, send issue to github:
https://github.com/crypti/crypti-public/issues
You are really helped us.
We will continue work, i will fix found issues.
If anyone found any mistake, please, send issue to github:
https://github.com/crypti/crypti-public/issues
June 30, 2014, 07:22:33 AM
a little disappointed....
I'm actually not. It only proves that devs do they best to get everything worked out well. I'd rather wait for proper working system with fair IPO than invest in something that might become a scam
June 30, 2014, 07:10:10 AM
a little disappointed....
June 30, 2014, 06:34:05 AM
Quote
OP post updated. Wait for IPO start time. I hope we will start today.
Has this been delayed?If you mean the pre-sale then unfortunately yes, we will post new date and time later on.
Best if you watch this thread or leave an email on crypti.me.
June 30, 2014, 06:32:56 AM
OP post updated. Wait for IPO start time. I hope we will start today.
Beta version (development)
http://crypti.me:6040/ - is development version of wallet. In testnet.
This is development beta version, if you found some issues, notify me via PM please.
We will fix it ASAP.
Timeline
Our plan:
Beta version (development)
http://crypti.me:6040/ - is development version of wallet. In testnet.
- PoS working only on our account, on next week we will up new nodes and make PoS for all.
- Free Crypti for users
- Merchant addresses
- 1% fee. But it will be changed soon to new model, look at The 1% Transaction Fee
- Updates will be posted each week before 30 July, then we will publish wallet for all
This is development beta version, if you found some issues, notify me via PM please.
We will fix it ASAP.
Timeline
Our plan:
- Finish wallet - 30 July
- Functional for custom blockchains and SDK - 1-15 September
- Listing on exchange (goal) - August
- First app on custom blockchains - November (first weeks)
Has this been delayed?
June 30, 2014, 06:32:40 AM
When will we be able to see the actual code/client?
I'm assuming this is not a web-only client and there will be a local daemon of some sort.
I'm assuming this is not a web-only client and there will be a local daemon of some sort.
As per OP, we will release the full source code (server and client ) every quarter.
June 30, 2014, 06:30:47 AM
Only i see that inteface is plagiary from NXT? 
It was an inspiration indeed, as the new NXT wallet set a standard for PoS crypto wallets, that said we will introduce look & feel changes as we go.
June 30, 2014, 06:18:26 AM
Only i see that inteface is plagiary from NXT?
June 30, 2014, 06:00:43 AM
Beta? It's not even alpha.
No mask symbols in password field on login screen (Firefox). OK in Chrome.
I can set negative amount and press send button - no error.
I can set incorrect password and press send button - no error.
No account number validation? NXT had some problem with this.
No error when address creating with incorrect password.
Transactions do not appear in the transaction list, although the amount was changed.
Incorrect date in blockchain (May)?
etc.
No mask symbols in password field on login screen (Firefox). OK in Chrome.
I can set negative amount and press send button - no error.
I can set incorrect password and press send button - no error.
No account number validation? NXT had some problem with this.
No error when address creating with incorrect password.
Transactions do not appear in the transaction list, although the amount was changed.
Incorrect date in blockchain (May)?
etc.
Thanks! We will fix it and we are working now.
May block - genesis block.
June 30, 2014, 05:53:51 AM
You should block the creations of more account from one IP..
this is not an answer; everybody can change IP address in one second with 2 clicks
I know, this is a problem I think..
June 30, 2014, 05:51:27 AM
You should block the creations of more account from one IP..
this is not an answer; everybody can change IP address in one second with 2 clicks
June 30, 2014, 05:50:06 AM
When will we be able to see the actual code/client?
I'm assuming this is not a web-only client and there will be a local daemon of some sort.
I'm assuming this is not a web-only client and there will be a local daemon of some sort.
June 30, 2014, 05:42:00 AM
can you tell us how much work should do and how long it takes ?
it seems its only a "static" client
June 30, 2014, 05:36:02 AM
Beta? It's not even alpha.
No mask symbols in password field on login screen (Firefox). OK in Chrome.
I can set negative amount and press send button - no error.
I can set incorrect password and press send button - no error.
No account number validation? NXT had some problem with this.
No error when address creating with incorrect password.
Transactions do not appear in the transaction list, although the amount was changed.
Incorrect date in blockchain (May)?
etc.
No mask symbols in password field on login screen (Firefox). OK in Chrome.
I can set negative amount and press send button - no error.
I can set incorrect password and press send button - no error.
No account number validation? NXT had some problem with this.
No error when address creating with incorrect password.
Transactions do not appear in the transaction list, although the amount was changed.
Incorrect date in blockchain (May)?
etc.
June 30, 2014, 05:30:11 AM
You should block the creations of more account from one IP..
June 30, 2014, 05:26:57 AM
Regarding escrow: I just talked to SyRenity and there were a couple of unclear things. I'm pretty nitpicking when it comes to escrow terms and I won't start escrowing before every little detail is known and fixed.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
smart choice
June 30, 2014, 05:18:13 AM
Regarding escrow: I just talked to SyRenity and there were a couple of unclear things. I'm pretty nitpicking when it comes to escrow terms and I won't start escrowing before every little detail is known and fixed.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
ok, thank you for the update
June 30, 2014, 05:17:28 AM
Regarding escrow: I just talked to SyRenity and there were a couple of unclear things. I'm pretty nitpicking when it comes to escrow terms and I won't start escrowing before every little detail is known and fixed.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
So the devs decided to delay the start of the IPO – which is a good idea in my eyes, as it will make things safer and clearer for investors.
Jump to: