Pages:
Author

Topic: [XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS - page 75. (Read 804672 times)

full member
Activity: 157
Merit: 100
Btw, for everyone's reference, the other major project I am working on is the first major dapp to be featured for the crypti platform. It will be a game, it will utilize multiple custom block chains and smart contracts, and it will be for mobile platforms at first. We won't open source the game itself but we will open source and release the smart contracts as well as hopefully a small documentary style video series on how we built it and incorporated the technology for others hoping to do the same as well as to show off what crypti is capable of. We have been pushing hard on it and think it will be a great first example of what is possible and highlight some of the benefits of using crypti as a platform.

Eric, Karma and I are the core team behind the development studio we are launching to produce and release it as well as future dapps.

here is my translation for chinese.i am not a Professional translater , but i think this would be a 90% correct one.

顺便告诉大家的是,另外一个我目前正在跟进的大项目就是将被推荐为Crypti 平台的第一个主要DAPP,它将是一个游戏,它将会利用多个自定义块链,和智能合约,它将主要为移动平台打造,我们将不会对游戏进行开源,但我们将会对智能合约部分进行开源,并且将会 发布一系列视频关于如何构建DAPP,以及展示给大家Crypti可以做什么!我们一直在努力推进,并且我们认为这将是一次非凡的实例告诉大家Crypti能做什么,使用Crypti的平台能给你带来什么好处。

Eric,Karma 和我是目前开发团队的核心成员,也是未来DAPP研发团队的核心。


that sounds great that the first DAPP is coming!
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
You correct his grammer? What about spelling? : ))
Just curious, no pressure, what's the updated expected ETA on the white paper?

We almost finished it, i think we will publish it in one-two weeks.

Boris has been writing some of it every day for two weeks.  My job is to correct his grammer.  Yesterday, the topics were about half completed. 


hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors
Just curious, no pressure, what's the updated expected ETA on the white paper?

We almost finished it, i think we will publish it in one-two weeks.

Boris has been writing some of it every day for two weeks.  My job is to correct his grammer.  Yesterday, the topics were about half completed. 

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
Hey guys,

we will postpone the weekly blog post to tomorrow. We will cover the status of current developments like open beta, beta client release, progress of the testing, whitepaper release and so on. Smiley



On another node: today we pushed an update to the beta client and the testnet blockchain started from 0. Many things got fixed in the backend and a few on the frontend. So, if you had some testnet XCR, they are no longer. Just PM me if you want new ones.


Thanks. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 511
Merit: 500
Boris, Crypti Lead Developer, Lisk Advisor
Just curious, no pressure, what's the updated expected ETA on the white paper?

We almost finished it, i think we will publish it in one-two weeks.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Just curious, no pressure, what's the updated expected ETA on the white paper?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
Btw, for everyone's reference, the other major project I am working on is the first major dapp to be featured for the crypti platform. It will be a game, it will utilize multiple custom block chains and smart contracts, and it will be for mobile platforms at first. We won't open source the game itself but we will open source and release the smart contracts as well as hopefully a small documentary style video series on how we built it and incorporated the technology for others hoping to do the same as well as to show off what crypti is capable of. We have been pushing hard on it and think it will be a great first example of what is possible and highlight some of the benefits of using crypti as a platform.

Eric, Karma and I are the core team behind the development studio we are launching to produce and release it as well as future dapps.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Btw Wulf, are you here to help or to dictate?
You don't take criticism well but seem to like to dish it out. I am no expert on design so I can't comment. But I'm sure between the crypti team
and yourself you guys will improve what is improvable. I'm thankful for crypti we have a design expert like you here but that doesn't mean
they have to listen to you. Just be patient, the design discussion you want will happen and you can have fun proving your points just be patient please.
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
Finally you said "people have lives", and this is where I take offence. You say this as if we (or specifically me in this case) don't have lives ourselves, or that our lives are somehow inferior to yours, that the time in our lives are somehow less valuable than yours. Did it not cross your mind that I too also took time out of my life, time that I could be doing countless other things with family members or whomever else to post feedback? Please don't act like you know me, or that you know who I am. You have no idea what other people are going through in their lives, so don't make assumptions or judgments on something like this EVER especially over the internet, where most often you know nothing about the person you are talking to.


It is obvious to everyone but you he meant the dev team have lives and can't analyze and respond to wulf's detailed criticisms within 2 days when design is kinda mid to low on priority list. If they didn't have lives then they would be sitting waiting for your criticism post and push everything aside to answer you as quickly as possible. Because they have lives they would probably have gotten around to addressing your post in a week. But you blew your top because you got no response after like 2 days! Typical wulf impatience.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Lets love each other with slow music.

I recommend Hearts Of Space - they've done a weekly hour-long show for three decades.

"Slow music for fast times".

https://www.hos.com/
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
@Grexx

I don't think Wulfcastle's post was aggressive at all, but yours definitely is.


Then you aren't reading it correctly. I've known Wulf a while now, he's upset and demanding a response because he put a lot of work into his reply and feels he's right. My point is that you shouldn't expect an immediate response or always expect a positive one. We are a Dev team working on a legitimate top tier technology and have a lot of moving parts.

Btw, I never said mine wasn't aggressive.

We are community focused and we listen, but don't think that gives you guys the right to make demands or come at us wrong. Many of our team members are doing this for pennies on the dollar and spending a lot of hours away from our families to make this happen for all of us. Try to be respectful.


To me Sparky_eMunie has reading comprehension problem. If you follow this thread wulf is very naggy and impatient. He says the community
has spoken haha. He is the only one who gave suggestion and demands devs to make the changes the "community" suggest. Okaaaaaaaaay.
We crypti need all community to stick together. Wulf has talent obv just his personality is like a wife. Grexx tried to calm him down.
Community is not always right like devs are not always right. Lets love each other with slow music.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
i have a few questions about delegates and DPOS

Only the first 101 delegates are harvesting ? Average joe can't forge sheet ?

The 10 000 xcr fees for delegate registration are distributed to the 101 ? Why can't we just lock 10 000 and unlock them instead after a while Huh

As it is, it just looks like a ponzi/pyramid scheme/gifting circle  Smiley You pay to get in, money goes to the top and so on  Smiley

Hello luckygenouogh56,

yes, only the first 101 delegates (also called top 101 or top delegates) are harvesting/forging. The other ones are continuously striving to make their nodes better, so the community vote for them. This adds a social security layer to the consensus mechanism, just like Bitshares does it.

Average joe need to provide a better service and node than the top 101 to get voted for. He also need to be a valuable and trustworthy member of the community. Only this way he will get enough votes.

The delegate fee is 100 XCR, we changed it recently. Can you tell me, where you read 10,000 XCR? So we can change it, maybe we forgot a place to update. The 100 XCR is a fee just like the fee when you send money. It gets distributed equally(!) to the 101 delegates, yes.

I agree that it looks a bit strange at the beginning, the foundation gets all the fees. However, you have to see the big picture. Once the most delegates are provided by the community, it will be a fair system. It's the chicken-egg problem, same "isn't it unfair that satoshi mined the first bitcoin block?".

Also, we currently have a few plans to get more community members involved. You will hear more regarding this matter soon.

I hope this answers your questions, just ask. Smiley

it was on the on the new UI testnet :


glad to hear it is a mistake. Thanks for your answer Smiley

Thanks, will be changed. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
i have a few questions about delegates and DPOS

Only the first 101 delegates are harvesting ? Average joe can't forge sheet ?

The 10 000 xcr fees for delegate registration are distributed to the 101 ? Why can't we just lock 10 000 and unlock them instead after a while Huh

As it is, it just looks like a ponzi/pyramid scheme/gifting circle  Smiley You pay to get in, money goes to the top and so on  Smiley

Hello luckygenouogh56,

yes, only the first 101 delegates (also called top 101 or top delegates) are harvesting/forging. The other ones are continuously striving to make their nodes better, so the community vote for them. This adds a social security layer to the consensus mechanism, just like Bitshares does it.

Average joe need to provide a better service and node than the top 101 to get voted for. He also need to be a valuable and trustworthy member of the community. Only this way he will get enough votes.

The delegate fee is 100 XCR, we changed it recently. Can you tell me, where you read 10,000 XCR? So we can change it, maybe we forgot a place to update. The 100 XCR is a fee just like the fee when you send money. It gets distributed equally(!) to the 101 delegates, yes.

I agree that it looks a bit strange at the beginning, the foundation gets all the fees. However, you have to see the big picture. Once the most delegates are provided by the community, it will be a fair system. It's the chicken-egg problem, same "isn't it unfair that satoshi mined the first bitcoin block?".

Also, we currently have a few plans to get more community members involved. You will hear more regarding this matter soon.

I hope this answers your questions, just ask. Smiley

it was on the on the new UI testnet :


glad to hear it is a mistake. Thanks for your answer Smiley
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
Ok nice move.  It will be nice if I can be voted as one of the delegates Smiley keep up the good work


Thanks. We will work on it!

Who are you? Smiley
He is a joker : ))
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
Ok nice move.  It will be nice if I can be voted as one of the delegates Smiley keep up the good work


Thanks. We will work on it!

Who are you? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
@Grexx

I don't think Wulfcastle's post was aggressive at all, but yours definitely is.


He is extremly busy.
full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
@Grexx

I don't think Wulfcastle's post was aggressive at all, but yours definitely is.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
@Passion_ltc

Have you guys taken a look at some of the feedback that we've provided you with for the new UI? When you guys put up the BETA on TestNet, you asked for feedback, and other community members and myself have come out and given you feedback on UI, and you guys have seem to have done nothing about it, let alone even discuss some of the points that other members and myself have put forward (colors, etc.).

Please do not think, that I am now crying foul, because you've said no to the changes that I proposed to the current UI. While I would like to see those changes being made, that's not what I'm concerned about. What I'm concerned about is the fact that we have provided you with feedback, I've provided three posts FULL of analysis to back up the points/arguments that myself and others have put forward to support our view on the current UI, and you guys don't seem to care enough to even discuss the matter with us.

You said that you guys have "your vision for Crypti", if you guys have your vision for the UI, well then please let us hear it. Please provide at least something concrete to say what you have for or against our points that we've put forward, so that we can at least discuss it, but please do not post asking for feedback only to say when we actually do give you feedback that it's essentially worthless.

Hello Wulfcastle,

I promise you I will answer you in detail tomorrow. Can you create a thread over at forum.crypti.me? Here it would go under. Smiley

Edit: As you not posted at our forum until now. Please write when you have, then I will answer you. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Member of the Crypti Foundation Board of Directors
I would consider any coins or fiat sent to CoinoMat as potential loses.  My scam detector is running yellow.

Here's something interesting to consider, ending in a few questions.  

I did a little research.  Coinomat is a "Certified Exchanger" with a larger currency exchange network called Perfect Money.

https://www.perfectmoney.com/

PM has around 200 "Certified Exchangers":

https://perfectmoney.is/business-partners.html

These all have a "Trust Score" assigned to them by Perfect Money.  Coinomat is in the middle of the pack with a trust score of 226.  See the orange shaded line in this spreadsheet I made of the data above, sorted by trust score:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Y-yJV-yZmWlbcYEak78BUCAj3C4AEFKLq6BAn1EbX8/edit#gid=0

Questions:  Would it benefit Crypti to get integrated with more of these Certified Exchangers, just as we are trying to do with Coinomat, maybe even with Perfect Money itself?  Perhaps an organized Crypti campaign starting with the most trusted Exchangers first?  If so, what is our sales point on why they would want to include us alongside Bitcoin?


Well Mal, I personally would stay away from any official association with a organization that I have 0 control of, and 100% liability  from.  CoinoMat is supposed to be an "instant Exchange", meaning they dont hold balances. 

So what happens when a fiat to XCR purchase goes wrong?  They blame Crypti. 

Ditto for any other coin to coin exchange. 

Best to let them live and die on their own efforts or lack thereof. 

If they want to have XCR as an available coin, that is their right.  Boris will be wiling to keep them updated with the latest wallets and provide any other help they need. 

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
@Passion_ltc

Have you guys taken a look at some of the feedback that we've provided you with for the new UI? When you guys put up the BETA on TestNet, you asked for feedback, and other community members and myself have come out and given you feedback on UI, and you guys have seem to have done nothing about it, let alone even discuss some of the points that other members and myself have put forward (colors, etc.).

Please do not think, that I am now crying foul, because you've said no to the changes that I proposed to the current UI. While I would like to see those changes being made, that's not what I'm concerned about. What I'm concerned about is the fact that we have provided you with feedback, I've provided three posts FULL of analysis to back up the points/arguments that myself and others have put forward to support our view on the current UI, and you guys don't seem to care enough to even discuss the matter with us.

You said that you guys have "your vision for Crypti", if you guys have your vision for the UI, well then please let us hear it. Please provide at least something concrete to say what you have for or against our points that we've put forward, so that we can at least discuss it, but please do not post asking for feedback only to say when we actually do give you feedback that it's essentially worthless.
Pages:
Jump to: