Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1087. (Read 1484238 times)
June 28, 2014, 03:27:15 PM
Yo wats da next milestone of this coin, or does exist a roadmap?
June 28, 2014, 03:26:57 PM
Why every day is there even mention of xxxxCoin in here? Please stop associating with xxxx coin and stop mentioning xxxx coin here. We all know here XC is superior and time will tell which coin will prevail.
Next person to mention xxxx Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
Next person to mention xxxx Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
You did it 4 times in this post
June 28, 2014, 03:26:30 PM
Charlie Chaplins back 
June 28, 2014, 03:20:28 PM
Hi guys can you tell me if my wallet is the latest version: v0.9.1.33x11-coin-1.0
Thanks.
Thanks.
Hi, current Version for Windows w/ XNODE is v0.9.1.50x11 www.xc-official.com/downloads.html for download
June 28, 2014, 03:12:42 PM
Hi guys can you tell me if my wallet is the latest version: v0.9.1.33x11-coin-1.0
Thanks.
Thanks.
June 28, 2014, 03:09:12 PM
Why every day is there even mention of DarkCoin in here? Please stop associating with dark coin and stop mentioning dark coin here. We all know here XC is superior and time will tell which coin will prevail.
Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
Yea its a good point you make, but from what I see is, when the XC community moves on and talks about XC, the dark trolls come in here and make it the order of business that we have to talk about drk. True story.
They cant accept we don't care for this shit anymore. Some of you are still biting, just stop lol.
I want to see the Darkcoin equivalent of this: Because we both know it WILL NOT STACK UP AGAINST XC AT ALL
Some useful facts about XC:
1) Xnodes are fully decentralised
2) Xnodes are a trustless design
3) Xnodes work
4) XC is already anonymous, and working
At this stage it appears that there'll be ongoing FUD attacks from competitor(s). I'd advise saving a link to this post, and using it to clarify the nature of XC whenever a fudder makes claims to the contrary. Then they'd either have to substantiate their claims or wander off.
To factuality over frustration,
Arlyn
1) Xnodes are fully decentralised
- Any wallet can run as an Xnode, not just a few semi-centralised clients
- Xnode setup is not complicated or time-consuming
2) Xnodes are a trustless design
- An earlier iteration of XC's design specified a dynamic trust system; this has been improved upon with a fully trustless design
- Rev 2 Xnodes will use trustless multi-path multisig
3) Xnodes work
- Early tests of Xnodes' mixing function (Rev. 1) have not resulted in any kind of flaw in this aspect of XC's anonymity solution.
- Our not-so-well-intentioned friend Chaeplin claimed to have found a "design flaw" in Rev 1. However he fails to apprehend (a) precisely what was being tested, (b) what would constitute XC failing the test, and (c) what his results actually show. For a summary, see https://www.google.com/url?q=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php%3Ftopic%3D630547.msg7310485
- Tests of Xnodes' initial multipath implementation (Rev. 1.5) have turned up no problems. In fact, no one was even able to mount a claim for the bounty.
- Multi-path is being fully implemented as we speak for Rev. 2. When it is released, there will be (a) a sizeable public bounty, and (b) consultations with several cryptographers and other experts.
- Given past progress, we're pretty optimistic that Rev. 2 will be delivered on time, and will compound the anonymity that is already working in XC.
4) XC is already anonymous, and working
- I can't stress this enough. It's working! It doesn't mysteriously fork. It was released on time. There have been no setbacks.
- XC is only 5 weeks old, and we're already at this level.
- XC is not a completed design. It anonymity will compound. Its user-friendliness will become a 1-click thing. Thorough, professional testing will render it bulletproof. See the roadmap: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7535822.
- Xnodes do not steal coins. But for the sake of historical accuracy, here's where this rumour started: Rev. 1 was released to test whether anyone could prove that a link exists on the blockchain between sender and receiver. Chaeplin misconstrued the purpose of the release and harped on about the fact that because mixers forward coins, coins could be stolen. This is true, but it's besides the point. All we were testing was whether anyone could provide a link on the blockchain. The rest of the build, including vulnerable transaction-forwarding, was just scaffolding so that the tests could be carried out. But, alas, Chaeplin appeared not to be amenable to realising this fact. Perhaps if his intention was to contribute constructively he would have avoided this lapse of comprehension.
At this stage it appears that there'll be ongoing FUD attacks from competitor(s). I'd advise saving a link to this post, and using it to clarify the nature of XC whenever a fudder makes claims to the contrary. Then they'd either have to substantiate their claims or wander off.
To factuality over frustration,
Arlyn
June 28, 2014, 03:04:33 PM
Why every day is there even mention of DarkCoin in here? Please stop associating with dark coin and stop mentioning dark coin here. We all know here XC is superior and time will tell which coin will prevail.
Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
FUCK: DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! DRK! Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
June 28, 2014, 03:02:09 PM
Why every day is there even mention of DarkCoin in here? Please stop associating with dark coin and stop mentioning dark coin here. We all know here XC is superior and time will tell which coin will prevail.
Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
Next person to mention Dark Coin on this thread is a flaming homo...starting now.
June 28, 2014, 02:45:06 PM
Left for a vacation and came back to this
Almost 6 XCs staked!!!
Almost 6 XCs staked!!!
June 28, 2014, 02:44:38 PM
When are we gonna see an order form for the Tor Stick? I know we won't get them for a while, but I want put an order in.
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
We're looking at various ways to sell TOR Sticks. You'll have opportunity to order one before they ship at Rev. 3.
I don't see any reason to limit the number of TOR Sticks one can buy. Personally I want at least two - a card and the little stainless steel one. :-)
June 28, 2014, 02:41:43 PM
I imagine all of the focus is on getting rev 2 out at the moment as that's just over 1 week away, I would not expect too much on other items till that's out of the door...
June 28, 2014, 02:41:21 PM
When are we gonna see an order form for the Tor Stick? I know we won't get them for a while, but I want put an order in.
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
Well it's a bootable stick so you won't be able to run multiple unless you use a virtual machine but then your better of just grabbing the iso and ordering one.
June 28, 2014, 02:32:49 PM
When are we gonna see an order form for the Tor Stick? I know we won't get them for a while, but I want put an order in.
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
Will there be a limit per person? How many can be run on one computer?
June 28, 2014, 02:27:33 PM
Updated my post on anti-FUD facts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7568377
June 28, 2014, 02:23:11 PM
It's going to crash in price / is crashing, there will be a fair few who played the wave with their XC I would imagine... Plus others looking for where to go next...
Edit and yes. Ty for correction I do mean veri
Edit and yes. Ty for correction I do mean veri
June 28, 2014, 02:22:36 PM
I think we will get a vertcoin wave coming over pretty soon, get in while it's cheap loyal holders! Don't let them have cheap coins
What do you mean with vertcoin wave?
I think he means Veri
June 28, 2014, 02:15:24 PM
I think we will get a vertcoin wave coming over pretty soon, get in while it's cheap loyal holders! Don't let them have cheap coins
What do you mean with vertcoin wave?
June 28, 2014, 02:14:57 PM
I think we will get a vertcoin wave coming over pretty soon, get in while it's cheap loyal holders! Don't let them have cheap coins
June 28, 2014, 02:07:30 PM
Some useful facts about XC:
1) Xnodes are fully decentralised
2) Xnodes are trustless
3) Xnodes work
4) XC is already anonymous, and working
At this stage it appears that there'll be ongoing FUD attacks from competitor(s). I'd advise saving a link to this post, and using it to clarify the nature of XC whenever a fudder makes claims to the contrary. Then they'd either have to substantiate their claims or wander off.
To factuality over frustration,
Arlyn
1) Xnodes are fully decentralised
- Any wallet can run as an Xnode, not just a few semi-centralised clients
- Xnode setup is not complicated or time-consuming
2) Xnodes are trustless
- An earlier iteration of XC's design specified a dynamic trust system; this has been improved upon with a fully trustless system
- Xnodes will now use multisig
3) Xnodes work
- Early tests of Xnodes' mixing function (Rev. 1) have not resulted in any kind of flaw in this aspect of XC's anonymity solution.
- Our not-so-well-intentioned friend Chaeplin claimed to have found a "design flaw" in Rev 1. However he fails to apprehend (a) precisely what was being tested, (b) what would constitute XC failing the test, and (c) what his results actually show. For a summary, see https://www.google.com/url?q=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php%3Ftopic%3D630547.msg7310485
- Tests of Xnodes' initial multipath implementation (Rev. 1.5) have turned up no problems. In fact, no one was even able to mount a claim for the bounty.
- Multi-path is being fully implemented as we speak for Rev. 2. When it is released, there will be (a) a sizeable public bounty, and (b) consultations with several cryptographers and other experts.
- Given past progress, we're pretty optimistic that Rev. 2 will be delivered on time, and will compound the anonymity that is already working in XC.
4) XC is already anonymous, and working
- I can't stress this enough. It's working! It doesn't mysteriously fork. It was released on time. There have been no setbacks.
- XC is only 5 weeks old, and we're already at this level.
- XC is not a completed design. It anonymity will compound. Its user-friendliness will become a 1-click thing. Thorough, professional testing will render it bulletproof.
- Xnodes do not steal coins. But for the sake of historical accuracy, here's where this rumour started: Rev. 1 was released to test whether anyone could prove that a link exists on the blockchain between sender and receiver. Chaeplin misconstrued the purpose of the release and harped on about the fact that because mixers forward coins, coins could be stolen. This is true, but it's besides the point. All we were testing was whether anyone could provide a link on the blockchain. The rest of the build, including vulnerable transaction-forwarding, was just scaffolding so that the tests could be carried out. But, alas, Chaeplin appeared not to be amenable to realising this fact. Perhaps if his intention was to contribute constructively he would have avoided this lapse of comprehension.
At this stage it appears that there'll be ongoing FUD attacks from competitor(s). I'd advise saving a link to this post, and using it to clarify the nature of XC whenever a fudder makes claims to the contrary. Then they'd either have to substantiate their claims or wander off.
To factuality over frustration,
Arlyn
Have TEKA quote this in OP, ALONG with roadmap, PLZ. OP is like 80% of current XC promo campaign, we need this stuff to be presented without even a click more needed by a new investor.
June 28, 2014, 02:06:36 PM
Is the wallet available for download trustless NOW? Or will it be trustless with REV2? It was my understanding that REV2 would make XC's anon solution trustless.
Yes, Rev 2 is the release of the full trustless multi-path architecture.
Thanks for the response. You should probably revise your original statement to make that clear. Because it reads as if currently the method is trustless.
Fair point. I'll be clearer about the distinction between a design and its current partial implementation. It'll be updated in a sec...
Jump to: