Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1262. (Read 1484248 times)

I vote in favor of further controlling obvious trolling/fuding posts by topic moderator. This is getting out of hand. Remember why this moderated thread was made in the first place?

There are serious, legitimate members who are concerned that a moderated thread only creates negative criticism and fear in peoples' minds, and they are RIGHT, thus the price is affected.

But the thing that is happening in the last 10 pages is having a negative effect on price ANYWAY.

What I suggest: Tesla keeps this thread tightly moderated. Then trolls can say w/e they want in unmoderated thread, and throw as much mud as they like, but we will have achieved one major thing: we will have this topic clean, with positive feedback and bug testing ONLY. That means that if chaeplin, and every chaeplin out there wants to test and try something, he is free to do so, but the next troll that replies to his findings gets immediately moderated.

I repeat, this is NOT to prevent people from expressing their opinion or stress concerning facts about the coin, but rather to KEEP THE TOPIC TIDY AND CLEAN, so new investors and traders know what's happening with the development at any given time.


I will suggest this as well in XC forum.

We were at 120 some minutes ago!! https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/mintpal/xcbtc  So i won the bet and im waiting my 1k XC When i will get it?

i hope u got room for 1 more on the xc train, cuz i am in yeahhhhhh  
had the coins for a few days, will hold and ride with u guys

i love you all guys  , go XC !!

Really good to see the unity on the board tonight. Go XC.

And if i may change the subject ......

Can someone with more tech skills comment on my question before so i can learn something new?



Would it be possible for a Xnode to combine multiple accounts eg: all B-addresses for receiving & all C-addresses for sending. (you initially start your Xnode with your own balance in the C-account group) After a while coins would be "moved" from C -> B-account by handling anon transactions.
Then the Xnode uses another Xnode to move the coins from B, back to a new address in C.

As long as the second fase is larger than atleast 2 transactions from the first fase it seems possible to me, prove seems difficult coz the second transaction would combine the input of multiple other anon-transactions. Maybe even combine this with more standard 'parts' of an anon transaction (eg: split them up like std money bills, first 1, 2, 5, 10 etc and then some small coins)

The output to the other node will combine all b-addresses but how to prove they match an previous handeld anon-transaction from that node?

+1

I agree too, this make no sence here to read so much thing as we read.

I really start to be angry of these small intellect around doing stupid concerns.

DRK is what it is, XC is what it is and that's all.

Now here it's XC discussion that should be more accurate without all these kind of kids concerns.

Can everyone just shut the hell up?  
 QUIET!

They'd be better off just going to Mcdonalds and invest in some big macs

could you chew both ur arms off so u can't post anymore, thanks in advance.

First of all, I'm baffled why anti-XC people are proactively taking the time & effort to jump in this thread and try to spread doubt about the integrity of this ongoing project when they could be spending the same amount of time/energy to help advance their specific coin of choice?  If you don't like/agree with what ATCsecure is doing for XC... then don't fucking buy XC.  It's pretty simple.

All you trolls should save your breath.  If you think that you're going to come in here, take a few screenshots, blab about a non-issue that has already been addressed and think you will cause masses of us to panic sell... well... you're an idiot.
Most of the people in this thread (and the official forum) have seen enough commitment and communication by the dev and team to feel comfortable investing our $ in the future of XC. We are in the very early stages of this coin and understand more work needs to be done. We believe XC will be a reputable, functioning and integral part of the future of cyptocurrency. If anything, all trollish behavior simply confirms that XC and the technology behind it is a possible threat to other cryptocurrencies and should be taken seriously. The more FUD that is trying to be spread, the more I feel confident in the upcoming progress of XC.

Stop wasting your time and everyone else's.  If you don't like this coin or the community, then take your $15 and invest in something else. You won't be missed here.

What the .... is wrong with you guys?
Is this a "community" or a for ever fighting room full of children? (No my toy is nicer, no my toy)
Let the DEV discus it with Chaeplin, and get out off the discussion.
Its getting pretty annoying to read this XC thread.

Grow up.

Or more likely incompetent trolls and their clones.

It's fun how both community are full of kids  

They are insulting each others for nothing.

Kiss me back for the peace 

 and what are you doing atm?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7239960

If I wanted to order a hit on someone, I rather have that message (containing name and adress of person) only shown once.. Hypothetically speaking ofcourse

We can expect beta testing to roll out around sunday???

You have pretty much missed my point.

My point was that as a member of the XC community your primary goal is to contribute to the benefit of the extended XC community.

But even now your still talking about Coin vs Coin and not contributing anything meaningful at all.

Please leave and take the other 49% with you if you don't mind.