so...encrypted messaging released possibly this week, can't wait to see it, exciting stuff! 
+1. The pace of development here leaves nothing to be desired.
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1330. (Read 1484248 times)
June 08, 2014, 05:34:43 PM
+1. The pace of development here leaves nothing to be desired.
June 08, 2014, 05:33:49 PM
so...encrypted messaging released possibly this week, can't wait to see it, exciting stuff!
June 08, 2014, 05:33:38 PM
"...doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available"
Perhaps you, dear fudder, only hold this opinion because you haven't visited this thread since the last FUDwar. (That's a guess, but the most plausible one that springs to mind.) The past three releases have had xnode functionality. The dev is now refining the xnode code before implementing the multi-path aspect.
So if you could kindly substantiate any further opinions you voice on this thread, that would be appreciated.
June 08, 2014, 05:32:26 PM
Even Darkcoin DRK got it right
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
totally broken fork Darkcoin, XC didn't. Xnode doesn't even have code is totally broken like darkcoin
wow. what a fail.
June 08, 2014, 05:30:23 PM
Pls guys, don t quote these idiots. Keeps the thread clean. Just ignore.
+1. If you reply, remove the FUD from your post and carry on.
June 08, 2014, 05:28:20 PM
Pls guys, don t quote these idiots. Keeps the thread clean. Just ignore.
June 08, 2014, 05:27:00 PM
Ignore button is busy tonight.. Probably a sign this is about to rise.
Yup. Why else did these lurkers appear all of a sudden?
June 08, 2014, 05:26:33 PM
Even Darkcoin DRK got it right
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
wow. what a fail.
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
wow. what a fail.
Xnodes work, so how do they work without the code? Maybe your a failed reader?
June 08, 2014, 05:23:36 PM
Even Darkcoin DRK got it right
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
wow. what a fail.
util.h
{
static const int64 COIN = 100000000;
static const int64 CENT = 1000000;
}
XC didn't even fork Darkcoin properly. Their code is totally broken, and it doesn't even have any Xnode code or implemenation available.
wow. what a fail.
June 08, 2014, 05:20:45 PM
Why does XC on divide to 6 decimals?
in util.h on github.
{
static const int64 COIN = 1000000;
static const int64 CENT = 10000;
}
COIN should be 100 million not 1 million. This means that XC are only divisible to 6 decimals and not to 8 decimals.
You can't do much colored coin related things with only 6 decimals, not enough units.
pretty stupid. that means there are 400 times less XC units then bitcoin units. If this coin is ever going to take off, it should be
built from success from the ground up.
Turns out that the devs just forked mintcoin code (obvious from /contrib in the github source) and they didn't even bother to notice.
Another example of dev incompetence.
in util.h on github.
{
static const int64 COIN = 1000000;
static const int64 CENT = 10000;
}
COIN should be 100 million not 1 million. This means that XC are only divisible to 6 decimals and not to 8 decimals.
You can't do much colored coin related things with only 6 decimals, not enough units.
pretty stupid. that means there are 400 times less XC units then bitcoin units. If this coin is ever going to take off, it should be
built from success from the ground up.
Turns out that the devs just forked mintcoin code (obvious from /contrib in the github source) and they didn't even bother to notice.
Another example of dev incompetence.
June 08, 2014, 05:11:15 PM
They don't understand that the devs of this coin are clueless and it will be worthless. You should sell your coins to the idiots.
Hey, you seem to have skipped my question...
If GOX resumes withdrawals on thursday, people will have easily turned 100BTC into 160BTC.
Not bad.
Not bad.
You mean clueless like your assessment of the GOX situation??
June 08, 2014, 05:09:36 PM
I think these are last hours that we see XC so cheap costly....must do some print screen of mintpal to have it for my crypto memory album......
you wanted to say: costly
June 08, 2014, 05:07:55 PM
Ignore button is busy tonight.. Probably a sign this is about to rise.
June 08, 2014, 05:07:13 PM
So if the ports are the same it simply means that it wouldn't be able to work with Bitcoin daemon simultaneously which doesn't appear to be catastrophic.
No, you don't understand. The P2P port and RPC ports are both set the same. This makes the binary built from source impossible to use.
This is concerning because the windows/mac/linux binaries that everyone is using are NOT the same as the ones built from source. Who knows if the official binaries contain malware unless we can build from source?
And I've already proved theres a bug in the source. Amateur hour here. I can't believe nobody spotted this yet. I suppose real auditors and devs stay away from the altcoin section of this forum.
Tried to build it myself but it requires libboost 1.55 while I have 1.54 in repos. Too lazy to get 1.55 so not going to test it. However I haven't seen people reporting problems with that. Also config must be enough to correct that.
Thats convenient. You don't have to build it. Check the port numbers on the init file and bitcoinrpc file on github.
Hell, even look at the --help output. they have the ports wrong there too.
Thanks man, we really appreciate that you are giving us warnings.
As you can see on Mintpal currently, where the price is rocketing from 0.00095000 to currently 0.0118799, everyone is dumping in panic mode because of your warnings. Oh no wait, nobody seems to give a fuck.
They don't understand that the devs of this coin are clueless and it will be worthless. You should sell your coins to the idiots.
June 08, 2014, 05:03:39 PM
its going to be between 100 and 1000xc max for running a xnode, that's only 1btc for been able to run a xnode... so cheap right now !
It will be good for the price once this is in place.
Cos people will buy 500XC to run an xnode, which pushes the price up
June 08, 2014, 05:03:27 PM
I think these are last hours that we see XC so cheap....must do some print screen of mintpal to have it for my crypto memory album......
LOL, some one / or some people are starting to quietly really fill up, buy orders are just constantly being replaced....
June 08, 2014, 05:02:37 PM
I think these are last hours that we see XC so cheap....must do some print screen of mintpal to have it for my crypto memory album......
June 08, 2014, 05:00:48 PM
Karma really is a bitch when you fuck with her 
June 08, 2014, 04:54:04 PM
XC JUMP to The SUN!
June 08, 2014, 04:49:59 PM
Agree
I hold a few DRK so not thrilled that its falling so much but maybe its a bit of karma for the big holders that fudded us so bad....
I hold a few DRK so not thrilled that its falling so much but maybe its a bit of karma for the big holders that fudded us so bad....
Jump to: