Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1334. (Read 1484246 times)

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Nom Nom Nom haha just buy bro !
exactly!
one wall to 16 btc and all!
hamsters eat!

remove the wall and hamsters sell!
put a wall - eat!

today everyone is waiting for growth - a reason to feed expensive cholesterol
and tomorrow morning, the price will be below two times

this is the psychology of the herd
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 500
XC has been really disappointing. Good thing it's just a DRK hedge for me.
legendary
Activity: 1070
Merit: 1021
you are like hamsters
you will be shown the wall on purchase and you are eating and buying more and more expensive!
XC a trap!

I can't work out whether your being serious or not... i think ur signature is confusing me
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
you are like hamsters
you will be shown the wall on purchase and you are eating and buying more and more expensive!
XC a trap!
Nom Nom Nom haha just buy bro !
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
you are like hamsters
you will be shown the wall on purchase and you are eating and buying more and more expensive!
XC a trap!
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
dont buy XC!!
it s trap!

In your posts you say dont buy XC and in your signature it says "pump XC on mintpal comming soon..."
Are you retarded or something?

It's the not often seen art of reverse trolling! Oh he's gooooood.
full member
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
dont buy XC!!
it s trap!

lol, are you so desesperate ??
just buy it and do some good profit in next few week or move on and cry later haha  Grin
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
dont buy XC!!
it s trap!

In your posts you say dont buy XC and in your signature it says "pump XC on mintpal comming soon..."
Are you retarded or something?
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 505
Best time to buy is now! This week we are back over 002, just sayin'
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
So if the ports are the same it simply means that it wouldn't be able to work with Bitcoin daemon simultaneously which doesn't appear to be catastrophic.

No, you don't understand. The P2P port and RPC ports are both set the same. This makes the binary built from source impossible to use.


This is concerning because the windows/mac/linux binaries that everyone is using are NOT the same as the ones built from source.  Who knows if the official binaries contain malware unless we can build from source?

And I've already proved theres a bug in the source.  Amateur hour here. I can't believe nobody spotted this yet. I suppose real auditors and devs stay away from the altcoin section of this forum.

Tried to build it myself but it requires libboost 1.55 while I have 1.54 in repos. Too lazy to get 1.55 so not going to test it. However I haven't seen people reporting problems with that. Also config must be enough to correct that.

Thats convenient. You don't have to build it. Check the port numbers on the init file and bitcoinrpc file on github.

Hell, even look at the --help output. they have the ports wrong there too.

Thanks man, we really appreciate that you are giving us warnings.
As you can see on Mintpal currently, where the price is rocketing from 0.00095000 to currently 0.0118799, everyone is dumping in panic mode because of your warnings. Oh no wait, nobody seems to give a fuck.
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE X11 CODE ON GITHUB HAS BUGS!!!!!!!!!!

THE RPC AND P2P PORTS ARE SET THE SAME SO ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO BUILD FROM SCRATCH AND HAVE A WORKING CLIENT.

THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST BASIC CONCEPTS IN BITCOIN. WHOEVER WOULD SET THESE PORTS THE SAME IS COMPLETELY IDIOTIC.

ITS AMATEUR HOUR AT XC COIN. I WOULD SHORT THIS THING AND SELL IT UNTIL IT HITS ZERO.

WHO KNOWS IF THE CLIENTS YOU ARE RUNNING ARE EVEN THE SAME AS THE SOURCE?HuhHuhHuh?? TOTALLY INSECURE TO RUN THIS!!!!!!

bitcoinrpc.cpp
static inline unsigned short GetDefaultRPCPort()
{
    return GetBoolArg("-testnet", false) ? 22347 : 32347;
}


protocol.h
static inline unsigned short GetDefaultPort(const bool testnet = fTestNet)
{
    return testnet ? 22347 : 32348;
}

Not really something to get worried about.
Testnet uses the same port for rpc and http but mainnet is fine.
Nevertheless... it should be corrected.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 427
Merit: 250
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
So if the ports are the same it simply means that it wouldn't be able to work with Bitcoin daemon simultaneously which doesn't appear to be catastrophic.

No, you don't understand. The P2P port and RPC ports are both set the same. This makes the binary built from source impossible to use.


This is concerning because the windows/mac/linux binaries that everyone is using are NOT the same as the ones built from source.  Who knows if the official binaries contain malware unless we can build from source?

And I've already proved theres a bug in the source.  Amateur hour here. I can't believe nobody spotted this yet. I suppose real auditors and devs stay away from the altcoin section of this forum.

Tried to build it myself but it requires libboost 1.55 while I have 1.54 in repos. Too lazy to get 1.55 so not going to test it. However I haven't seen people reporting problems with that. Also config must be enough to correct that.

Thats convenient. You don't have to build it. Check the port numbers on the init file and bitcoinrpc file on github.

Hell, even look at the --help output. they have the ports wrong there too.
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
XC-Rocket ready to fly!

price upper and upper!

don t byu XC
its SCAM!


Let me guess, you sold all your XC earlier today and now you are upset the price is going up?  Grin
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
WARNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE X11 CODE ON GITHUB HAS BUGS!!!!!!!!!!

THE RPC AND P2P PORTS ARE SET THE SAME SO ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO BUILD FROM SCRATCH AND HAVE A WORKING CLIENT.

THIS IS ONE OF THE MOST BASIC CONCEPTS IN BITCOIN. WHOEVER WOULD SET THESE PORTS THE SAME IS COMPLETELY IDIOTIC.

ITS AMATEUR HOUR AT XC COIN. I WOULD SHORT THIS THING AND SELL IT UNTIL IT HITS ZERO.

WHO KNOWS IF THE CLIENTS YOU ARE RUNNING ARE EVEN THE SAME AS THE SOURCE?HuhHuhHuh?? TOTALLY INSECURE TO RUN THIS!!!!!!

If GOX resumes withdrawals on thursday, people will have easily turned 100BTC into 160BTC.

Not bad.

How's that 100 BTC doing for you?

loooooool low blow, but very funny  Grin


You know whats not funny?  Basic bugs in the XC code on github.  why don't the devs address this issue?

check /contrib/debian, they didn't even bother removing references to Mintcoin.
sr. member
Activity: 427
Merit: 250
So if the ports are the same it simply means that it wouldn't be able to work with Bitcoin daemon simultaneously which doesn't appear to be catastrophic.

No, you don't understand. The P2P port and RPC ports are both set the same. This makes the binary built from source impossible to use.


This is concerning because the windows/mac/linux binaries that everyone is using are NOT the same as the ones built from source.  Who knows if the official binaries contain malware unless we can build from source?

And I've already proved theres a bug in the source.  Amateur hour here. I can't believe nobody spotted this yet. I suppose real auditors and devs stay away from the altcoin section of this forum.

Tried to build it myself but it requires libboost 1.55 while I have 1.54 in repos. Too lazy to get 1.55 so not going to test it. However I haven't seen people reporting problems with that. Also config must be enough to correct that.
hero member
Activity: 540
Merit: 500
XC on the rise currently on Mintpal. Remove your sell orders, let it rise! Be calm.
There is someone with 18 BTC trying to push the price up, doing a good job so far.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 214
Merit: 100
Panic rebuy coming as expected Smiley
Jump to: