Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1549. (Read 1484244 times)

legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000


Indeed it wasn't.

Evan is working on it for months and he had to scrap his work and go through alternative ways because some of the first implementations had drawbacks or design limitations / flaws. Is the current implementation perfect? Far from it, otherwise it wouldn't need anonymity upgrades in upcoming versions.

As far as I know Anonymint contributed through constructive feedback but he prefers ring signatures.

Dan will need as much help as he can get to make it work but the crowd's expectation is simply unrealistic in term of instant gratification / market explosion to ...0.05. If price goes over fundamentals, the pressure to deliver is immense and the price swings are excessive. A bumpy ride so to speak.

Sir, you made a great U-Turn.

congratulations.
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
If it matters, the dev is who he says he is, I checked and I am sure. Felt a little like a friendly stalker matching everything up, but, I am very paranoid after all the BS with some coins. He is legit, so, don't worry about that. I am also quite confident he can pull it off.

Anyway, great dev, great coin. Should do quite well over time.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/

I hold both XC and DRK (XC reduced by a massive %) after seeing the code copy in the DRK thread. I bought XCs at 0.00007 and sold at >0.004+.

Nobody considered this as "false accussations" because, well... It's code available on github. It's either there, or it isn't. And it was there (=true story, not "accussations"). It's not someone making stuff out of their mind.

Twitter is a different issue and it shouldn't be handled that way, in that we agree.

My assessment so far is that the anonymity* proposed is flawed. I am neither a legendary coder or a cryptographer, I simply have been on the anonymity market for something like 3-4 months and I'm starting to understand it better.

I believe the coder can contribute something to cryptoland in terms of new techniques of encrypted communication but not in the anonymity department. I simply don't see something superior to DarkSend right now or with the prospect of becoming such. A wallet/node getting money and then sending money by remote trigger/action? This is not good even as a proof of concept.

* Defined as private for all intents and purposes, but not NSA-proof. NSA-proofing is a whole different game, perhaps 2015+ for some coin of the anon market.


AlexGR... Evan needed help from AnonMint. (hope i spelled it correctly). Dan will probably get contributions from the community as well. I choose to wait and see. Rome and DRK for that matter wasn't built in a day.

Indeed it wasn't.

Evan is working on it for months and he had to scrap his work and go through alternative ways because some of the first implementations had drawbacks or design limitations / flaws. Is the current implementation perfect? Far from it, otherwise it wouldn't need anonymity upgrades in upcoming versions.

As far as I know Anonymint contributed through constructive feedback but he prefers ring signatures.

Dan will need as much help as he can get to make it work but the crowd's expectation is simply unrealistic in term of instant gratification / market explosion to ...0.05. If price goes over fundamentals, the pressure to deliver is immense and the price swings are excessive. A bumpy ride so to speak.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:

{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.


One more thing.  note that the addresses for "main" at the end of the code are not the same even though it is the same account

Code:
msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow



15:58:49

Welcome to the X11Coin RPC console.
Use up and down arrows to navigate history, and Ctrl-L to clear screen.
Type help for an overview of available commands.


16:04:26

"sendfrommixer" main msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow 57.0


16:04:26




16:09:04

"sendfrommixer" main msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow 2.0


16:09:04




16:10:49

"gettransaction" 92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d


16:10:49

{
"txid" : "92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401484165,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "c9bfdd9b227786d4d3f4e8a494459396df0a857ff6913c1b1fb25b3f8b5da724",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502203cf87e7fe55d491294de4e1fb010858e9b697c365158aef9c135ba72788b4564022100f2553300963ef6cc49ed8fcfe18cb2cbba31b0f1e03ca9f7852b2f7db465863401 03eb0c1e3965f3fdb5bb12be8463623f0ccd1badacaefc3eb165896d8b8fb5e5bd",
"hex" : "48304502203cf87e7fe55d491294de4e1fb010858e9b697c365158aef9c135ba72788b4564022100f2553300963ef6cc49ed8fcfe18cb2cbba31b0f1e03ca9f7852b2f7db4658634012103eb0c1e3965f3fdb5bb12be8463623f0ccd1badacaefc3eb165896d8b8fb5e5bd"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
},
{
"txid" : "f1928df7ff419674f9d136f124a49dded9a036bd5b71b123126d8d5bbe91a22c",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "3045022100965cd149a3d9ad3d469be3f0a149d28823127dd086b94303bbb05494ff04d4420220283c6a6f74105e5022c0f7fde66ff10e3141f10056c6529050e23d4175803e7e01 02dc374c7c7fcd5aaf98c55ff731bf3ea818f9fb4d781b177f4674bd57ba5419b8",
"hex" : "483045022100965cd149a3d9ad3d469be3f0a149d28823127dd086b94303bbb05494ff04d4420220283c6a6f74105e5022c0f7fde66ff10e3141f10056c6529050e23d4175803e7e012102dc374c7c7fcd5aaf98c55ff731bf3ea818f9fb4d781b177f4674bd57ba5419b8"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.69638200,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 909967cc22d95941fb217d52e7d85e0f04f03dd6 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914909967cc22d95941fb217d52e7d85e0f04f03dd688ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mthXNUYbqWBJz91zi1hUiDW4c3CgXDvtVK"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.17177200,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 d4f1a567afe556b8e1f83fc70d2d918fd9c7e3ae OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914d4f1a567afe556b8e1f83fc70d2d918fd9c7e3ae88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mzvu2b5Ya4GtFum9vCyvu4MAvLEgnJSsCW"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -1.17177200,
"fee" : -0.00002000,
"confirmations" : 1,
"blockhash" : "000003ba4410e9be27dee00053af64fb971642465b8f0f725a254fadd8dd21e5",
"blockindex" : 3,
"blocktime" : 1401484217,
"txid" : "92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d",
"time" : 1401484165,
"timereceived" : 1401484165,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "main",
"address" : "mzvu2b5Ya4GtFum9vCyvu4MAvLEgnJSsCW",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -1.17177200,
"fee" : -0.00002000
}
]
}
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
How do I find out what my own adress is ?

Click on Receive Coins in your wallet
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
How do I find out what my own adress is ?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
For the few people considering selling, I need to tell you that the trend was reversed and the price will increase in the next 6-7 hours. We will probably break 250k again.

It is driving me crazy because my BTC from coinbase wont be here until Monday!!! Gah

Sorry to say, but this may happen much sooner.   Wink Wink

I know Smiley
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I forgot where I put my wallet.dat
I just received a pm. Someone is working on block explorer for test net now to collect the bounty I and another member posted

+1 you da BOSS. Thanks for putting that bounty out there guys!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
For the few people considering selling, I need to tell you that the trend was reversed and the price will increase in the next 6-7 hours. We will probably break 250k again.

It is driving me crazy because my BTC from coinbase wont be here until Monday!!! Gah

Sorry to say, but this may happen much sooner.   Wink Wink
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
For the few people considering selling, I need to tell you that the trend was reversed and the price will increase in the next 6-7 hours. We will probably break 250k again.

It is driving me crazy because my BTC from coinbase wont be here until Monday!!! Gah
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
I made a video of the anon transaction.  walked through all important aspects including the addressES NOT showing up in the transaction

I still take tips. 
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I just received a pm. Someone is working on block explorer for test net now to collect the bounty I and another member posted
sr. member
Activity: 261
Merit: 250
but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/

I hold both XC and DRK (XC reduced by a massive %) after seeing the code copy in the DRK thread. I bought XCs at 0.00007 and sold at >0.004+.

Nobody considered this as "false accussations" because, well... It's code available on github. It's either there, or it isn't. And it was there (=true story, not "accussations"). It's not someone making stuff out of their mind.

Twitter is a different issue and it shouldn't be handled that way, in that we agree.

My assessment so far is that the anonymity* proposed is flawed. I am neither a legendary coder or a cryptographer, I simply have been on the anonymity market for something like 3-4 months and I'm starting to understand it better.

I believe the coder can contribute something to cryptoland in terms of new techniques of encrypted communication but not in the anonymity department. I simply don't see something superior to DarkSend right now or with the prospect of becoming such. A wallet/node getting money and then sending money by remote trigger/action? This is not good even as a proof of concept.

* Defined as private for all intents and purposes, but not NSA-proof. NSA-proofing is a whole different game, perhaps 2015+ for some coin of the anon market.



AlexGR... Evan needed help from AnonMint. (hope i spelled it correctly). Dan will probably get contributions from the community as well. I choose to wait and see. Rome and DRK for that matter wasn't built in a day.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
"XC" very good name. I glad that devs dont rename to weak "Executive"

Feedback was key and we listened to it. Hence why it's still XC
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 100
The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation
I put some french words here about XC, when I saw Bitcoin vs. Darkcoin french article .. I though that some people are not face the reality.
http://www.bitcoin.fr/post/Bitcoin-vs-Darkcoin?pub=1#c16295102
good job man Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 254
This is great news! Im so glad i exchanged all my DRK last night for XC!!!!!

WELL DONE TEAM

sarcasm or really?
legendary
Activity: 971
Merit: 1000
Can we get our PR peeps to follow up with the author of this article. It only mentions how DRK made the twitter accusation and the how it affected price but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/


https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472488419919015936

+1

testnet blockchain will be ready soon, i surmise.

and teamview video is also ready soon.

Who is working on the video guys can we review it privately before make it public?

I am. Everything is reviewed and edited for accuracy and properly sourced so anyone can look into anything if they chose. Transparency with the user is extremely important and we value any and all positive community support. If you have a suggestion, you can post here or start a conversation at http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/

XC - Community Mod.
hero member
Activity: 661
Merit: 500
its again really cheap but not for long time go gogogo buy some XC "la mayo est en train de prendre" !
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/

I hold both XC and DRK (XC reduced by a massive % after seeing the code copy in the DRK thread). I bought XCs at 0.00007 and sold at >0.004+.

Nobody considered this as "false accussations" because, well... It's code available on github. It's either there, or it isn't. And it was there (=true story, not "accussations"). It's not someone making stuff out of their mind.

Twitter is a different issue and it shouldn't be handled that way, in that we agree.

My assessment so far is that the anonymity* proposed is flawed. I am neither a legendary coder or a cryptographer, I simply have been on the anonymity market for something like 3-4 months and I'm starting to understand it better.

I believe the coder can contribute something to cryptoland in terms of new techniques of encrypted communication but not in the anonymity department. I simply don't see something superior to DarkSend right now or with the prospect of becoming such. A wallet/node getting money and then sending money by remote trigger/action? This is not good even as a proof of concept.

* Defined as private for all intents and purposes, but not NSA-proof. NSA-proofing is a whole different game, perhaps 2015+ for some coin of the anon market.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
This is great news! Im so glad i exchanged all my DRK last night for XC!!!!!

WELL DONE TEAM
Jump to: