Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1552. (Read 1484244 times)

full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
Propulsion and AlexGR... YOU both missed the team viewer?

Yup. They "missed" it....
sr. member
Activity: 261
Merit: 250
I know Barabbas was making this claim about loljosh. Do some research on Barabbas.
full member
Activity: 269
Merit: 100
The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation
I'm a layman so alot of this tech stuff goes over my head, but what my impression is so far is alot of the FUD flying has been countered very well.

In order this is my experience over the last week

OMG this dev is fake, he'll never have a wallet by Sunday!

- check, wallet on Sunday

then

OMG this guy is not Dan Metcalfe, that is just speculation, he is probably some kid

- check, Dan Metcalfe updates his linkedin

OMG there is a one line mention of fedoracoin, sell, sell, sell!

- check, Mindfox looks at the code and confirms it's not fedora's.

I believe in solid, honest questions but after being inundated with scam coins for months now, this is one of the most transparent devs i've come across and frankly his age and resume give me more confidence than alot of these 20 year-old copy paste kids. Do I still hold out the possibility he can't pull it off? Sure, but I do think if there is ANY coin that can compete with Dark, this is it, no other comes close except MRO which has issues of its own as well.

Agree! Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
I'm a layman so alot of this tech stuff goes over my head, but what my impression is so far is alot of the FUD flying has been countered very well.

In order this is my experience over the last week

OMG this dev is fake, he'll never have a wallet by Sunday!

- check, wallet on Sunday

then

OMG this guy is not Dan Metcalfe, that is just speculation, he is probably some kid

- check, Dan Metcalfe updates his linkedin

OMG there is a one line mention of fedoracoin, sell, sell, sell!

- check, Mindfox looks at the code and confirms it's not fedora's.

I believe in solid, honest questions but after being inundated with scam coins for months now, this is one of the most transparent devs i've come across and frankly his age and resume give me more confidence than alot of these 20 year-old copy paste kids. Do I still hold out the possibility he can't pull it off? Sure, but I do think if there is ANY coin that can compete with Dark, this is it, no other comes close except MRO which has issues of its own as well.


You win Sir
sr. member
Activity: 261
Merit: 250
Propulsion and AlexGR... YOU both missed the team viewer?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:

{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.


I was on the session and can confirm all of this.  Very exciting stuff!  Thanks again for hosting.

I was on the session too I remember you sending coin to this address mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j am I wrong? Sorry I really did not get what you have stated in your post but this just of my ignorance in the matter Please could you clarify a bit better for me?

Thank you
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
I'm a layman so alot of this tech stuff goes over my head, but what my impression is so far is alot of the FUD flying has been countered very well.

In order this is my experience over the last week

OMG this dev is fake, he'll never have a wallet by Sunday!

- check, wallet on Sunday

then

OMG this guy is not Dan Metcalfe, that is just speculation, he is probably some kid

- check, Dan Metcalfe updates his linkedin

OMG there is a one line mention of fedoracoin, sell, sell, sell!

- check, Mindfox looks at the code and confirms it's not fedora's.

I believe in solid, honest questions but after being inundated with scam coins for months now, this is one of the most transparent devs i've come across and frankly his age and resume give me more confidence than alot of these 20 year-old copy paste kids. Do I still hold out the possibility he can't pull it off? Sure, but I do think if there is ANY coin that can compete with Dark, this is it, no other comes close except MRO which has issues of its own as well.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
should have recorded it. 

I will do that later.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
The Buck Stops Here.
teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?

Did Propulsion see this?  For some reason, and I don't know what it is, I'm very interested in what he/she has to say.

Unfortunately, I missed it. At the moment I'm more interested in getting a Testnet Abe Explorer running. https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe Since this will prove without any doubt if the anonymity works or not.

Was the teamview recorded by any chance?
newbie
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   Grin

What happened?

I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on BTC-e  Grin

Do you mean the trollbox? I haven't heard btc-e ever including DRK for trade.

Also apologies for DRK discussion here.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
just so you all know, I accept tips   Grin
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
So now we have had two successful peer reviews, a potential peer review from rat4 and the proof of concept has been demonstrated on teamviewer. And we have the test net demo up and running.

How much peer review has DRK had.

The DRK trolls will still find something to complain about, but serious investors who can think for themselves will reach their own conclusions.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:

{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.


I was on the session and can confirm all of this.  Very exciting stuff!  Thanks again for hosting.
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 500
I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?

Apparently is it to some people...

Dunno why it should be even if its true
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.



As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.


i second that. this feature works well.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   Grin

What happened?

I dont know but I just receive that information...you can check for your self it is no longer on https://btc-e.com/  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:

{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100

If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....

Honestly some of the hate you are getting is from xc holders who don't want to toyed with and the rest is from some darkcoin holders.

And I understand them, here you have a pre alpha anonymity release with no proof of it working apart from sketchy screenshots. And people are saying it's way better than darksend already  (which actually works right now), and they actually have no idea how it works. Burden of proof is on xc, not dark.

Can I see in teamview how darksend work ?
sr. member
Activity: 478
Merit: 250
I'm guessing that the dev outsourced the basic coin creation to loljosh but he is not on the team and has nothing to do with the xcode. Would that be such a big deal?
Jump to: