Author

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1555. (Read 1484244 times)

full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
you cant just replace the address with others ,this is serious buddy , i got 50k coins and support you so long, i see no evidence in the core of the underlying code for any anonymity. a little disappointing Undecided

that is not what is happening here at all

how did you come to this conclusion?


Atc I just wanted to say I think you are doing a fantastic job and I am grateful for your hard work.

I'm not directing this at the person you are speaking to but plz remember at all times a lot of people are spreading fear, uncertainty and doubt about your project because they see it as a threat to their other investment or because they want cheap coins.

Unfortunately that is the toxic nature of the community but the good news is the cream always rises to the top.  Cool
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
ATCSECURE has even offered a bounty to someone who could provide a testnet blockexplorer to answer back the constructive criticism. This is the last step towards the launching of this project, someone please do it.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

do you really know what they are talking about?
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
and I guess I should not have named it "main" so you could see it.

give me a minute.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Quote

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?


the receiver can not see the original wallet address

Now I'm really confused.  What address was shown in the post I asked about (mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5)?


I can post a pic of my address...  but I do not have a mwca.  

so yeah,  you cannot see my address.

your several posts and comments are little bit confusing.

tell us Xnode is working or not? any bug?
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500
Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
Quote

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?


the receiver can not see the original wallet address

Now I'm really confused.  What address was shown in the post I asked about (mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5)?


I can post a pic of my address...  but I do not have a mwca.  

so yeah,  you cannot see my address.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0

If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....

They are trying to understand if the dev is for real / if he can deliver what he promises. Depending one's assessment of the situation, one can either buy or sell.


true, but why not wait until the promised anonymous transaction is actually released to critique it with a sledgehammer?

and sure, you want to know everything possible before investing your hard earned money in, but everyone seems to be jumping the gun here and expecting things RIGHT AWAY that were never promised to be available right away. if you're not comfortable with not knowing everything before getting involved in the coin, don't get involved. don't harass the Dev into things you want known before you invest since it's all still In Development.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
has anyone received payment from the multipool?
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.

But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again

Does dark currently have decentralized anon transfers? (sorry for talking about dark here)

this is not the DRK thread, please no DRK discussion here
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.

But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again

Does dark currently have decentralized anon transfers? (sorry for talking about dark here)
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.

But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again

+1

+1000
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Atcsecure, thanks for the progress so far. I hope everyone understands this is preliminary testing of decentralized anon transfers.

But I think it would be helpful if instead of answering one question or criticism at a time, you organized answer to everyones questions and concerns in one big informative post. I think this will be helpful. Thanks again
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
a bit more description

pardon my drawing.  touchpad and me not good


Thank You for posting this!

this shows the details - user A requests to send to user B  (user b address is in the sendfrommixer) - but wallet sends to "xnode", not user B
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
well, i can trust you dev but i dont like gambling...... need some real evidence Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049

If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....

They are trying to understand if the dev is for real / if he can deliver what he promises. Depending one's assessment of the situation, one can either buy or sell.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Quote

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?


the receiver can not see the original wallet address

Now I'm really confused.  What address was shown in the post I asked about (mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5)?
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
advice:

- fully anonimity with noted blockchain technology is unreal and never will be released.

Admittedly, it's quite a hack to make something transparent work anonymously. At most you can obfuscate things to a degree that is untraceable by 99.9999% of third parties, except some large adversary like the NSA which can control networks, nodes, entire coins through their $$$ etc etc.

NSA-proofing (full anonymity) on the bitcoin's blockchain tech will require some very smart thinking.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0

If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
a bit more description

pardon my drawing.  touchpad and me not good


Thank You for posting this!
Jump to: