[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1558.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: Grifftech on May 30, 2014, 02:33:46 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on May 30, 2014, 02:31:57 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on May 30, 2014, 02:16:10 PM

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product. period. it has been stated as such.

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:

I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.

Troll on.

So that picture is showing that this wallet was chosen for this mixed transaction

This release is a only a test - as the plan was to fix up some key items and release in 3-4 weeks

All this has done has given the FUDers more fuel for the next 3-4 weeks now. Nothing should be released without hard evidence to substantiate the said functionality.

Seems no matter what - that there will be FUD...

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote

this must be fud - that can't be true, if it is, it will be so easyto patch the wallet and comment out the sending, in conclusion i'll recieve the coins from the one whos mixing but i will not send them to the destination and keep them -> easy stealing ...

the protocol will handle this, it won't be "Easy stealing" and yes there are bugs ,this is a test release

Grifftech

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: atcsecure on May 30, 2014, 02:31:57 PM

Quote from: evtrmm on May 30, 2014, 02:16:10 PM

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product. period. it has been stated as such.

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:

http://bammine.com/images/node.JPG

I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.

Troll on.

So that picture is showing that this wallet was chosen for this mixed transaction

This release is a only a test - as the plan was to fix up some key items and release in 3-4 weeks

All this has done has given the FUDers more fuel for the next 3-4 weeks now. Nothing should be released without hard evidence to substantiate the said functionality.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: saberu on May 30, 2014, 02:29:38 PM

Quote from: Propulsion on May 30, 2014, 02:26:19 PM

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

I agree with this, regardless of whether this coin is genuine or not I am planning to dump all my coins somewhere between 400-500k then either buy back at a lower price or stay in BTC until I see some more evidence.

I am fed up of the screenshots, lets get some real evidence here.

feel free.
http://xc-official.com/release/

make sure you run it with the .bat file

setgenerate true.

or we can teamview. Im in. gotta pick up my daughter in about 15 though, so hurry....

cyberhacker

legendary

Activity: 1330

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Grifftech on May 30, 2014, 02:31:26 PM

Can we get a block explorer for the testnet so we can shut these fucking idiots up already.

+1.

i am fed up with those fucktards. sorry to break the rules.

fucking idiots just slow down everything in schedule!

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: evtrmm on May 30, 2014, 02:16:10 PM

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product. period. it has been stated as such.

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:

I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.

Troll on.

So that picture is showing that this wallet was chosen for this mixed transaction

This release is a only a test - as the plan was to fix up some key items and release in 3-4 weeks

Grifftech

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Can we get a block explorer for the testnet so we can shut these fucking idiots up already.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: Propulsion on May 30, 2014, 02:26:19 PM

Quote from: mojun7982 on May 30, 2014, 02:21:50 PM

Quote from: Grifftech on May 30, 2014, 02:10:51 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer? Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up. Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

Pretty sure nobody refused anything.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: saberu on May 30, 2014, 02:27:37 PM

Definitely something fishy going on. As you can see the two addresses DO exist in the testnet, yet the transaction ID has magically disapeared after the post earlier. Though its possible the new tests are being conducted on a seperate `copied` blockchain from the original testnet, if this is true then I apologise for this post. And Im not trying to spread fud as I own 30k XC myself.

03:22:14

validateaddress mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5

03:22:14

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5",
"ismine" : false
}

03:22:49

validateaddress moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD

03:22:49

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD",
"ismine" : false
}

NO there is only 1 block chain or a fork

saberu

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: Propulsion on May 30, 2014, 02:26:19 PM

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

I agree with this, regardless of whether this coin is genuine or not I am planning to dump all my coins somewhere between 400-500k then either buy back at a lower price or stay in BTC until I see some more evidence.

I am fed up of the screenshots, lets get some real evidence here.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Still looking for anyone to pm me with any questions.

saberu

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Definitely something fishy going on. As you can see the two addresses DO exist in the testnet, yet the transaction ID has magically disapeared after the post earlier. Though its possible the new tests are being conducted on a seperate `copied` blockchain from the original testnet, if this is true then I apologise for this post. And Im not trying to spread fud as I own 30k XC myself.

03:22:14

validateaddress mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5

03:22:14

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5",
"ismine" : false
}

03:22:49

validateaddress moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD

03:22:49

{
"isvalid" : true,
"address" : "moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD",
"ismine" : false
}

Thrash

sr. member

Activity: 519

Merit: 253

Quote from: coine_smithe on May 30, 2014, 02:23:29 PM

Quote from: the_game1224 on May 30, 2014, 02:22:18 PM

not sure what to believe...... Huh

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

This statement is kind of true but should say:

If you buy any crypto coin, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

But I sure like these odds.

Propulsion

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

The Buck Stops Here.

Quote from: mojun7982 on May 30, 2014, 02:21:50 PM

Quote from: Grifftech on May 30, 2014, 02:10:51 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer? Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up. Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

It is a requirement to have a testnet block explorer especially when you are staking the whole entire coin on the promise of being anonymous.

To simply show a screenshot of "Unknown", and then have the dev refuse to show the explorer transaction is alarmingly scary.

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: coine_smithe on May 30, 2014, 02:23:29 PM

Quote from: the_game1224 on May 30, 2014, 02:22:18 PM

not sure what to believe...... Huh

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

I already hold, I just meant not sure what to think of the previous page's developments

coine_smithe

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: the_game1224 on May 30, 2014, 02:22:18 PM

not sure what to believe...... Huh

If you buy a coin when you aren't sure about it, then you are gambling. Simple as that.

virtualfaqs

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Well I was deciding whether to sell or not. But I couldn't understand any of that! Wink

the_game1224

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

not sure what to believe...... Huh

mojun7982

full member

Activity: 269

Merit: 100

The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation

Quote from: Grifftech on May 30, 2014, 02:10:51 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

How much time does it take to make a testnet block explorer? Make a bounty and get it going if it shuts people up. Let's just do it.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

they need more than more if you give they more.

megges

sr. member

Activity: 371

Merit: 250

Quote from: evtrmm on May 30, 2014, 02:16:10 PM

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product. period. it has been stated as such.

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:

I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.

Troll on.

this must be fud - that can't be true, if it is, it will be so easyto patch the wallet and comment out the sending, in conclusion i'll recieve the coins from the one whos mixing but i will not send them to the destination and keep them -> easy stealing ...

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1558. (Read 1484246 times)