Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1559. (Read 1484246 times)

can anyone confirm this? seems interesting and could explain

Its darkcoin kids talking shite, they know darkcoin is about as useful as a chocolate fireguard

Glad to hear there is some progress.
Trolls are everywhere, weak hands are selling on good info.
Lol

I tried using candl`s command to check the transaction ID but it says ID doesnt exist. I added the testnet parameter when executing the program so it should have worked if Candl wasnt spreading Fud.

Most likely the testnet of the new wallet is on a whole new blockchain to the current release wallet testnet, this makes sense as the dev says the new wallet isnt available for testing yet.

So this is definitely fud.

first thing, we all know this is not a finished product.  period.  it has been stated as such.  

Now the question of making a decentralized anon wallet was in question, so I give you:



I did not initiate this transaction, yet I saw it come through on my laptop here.

no matter what is said, The fact is that the developer is still here, he continues working on the project, and we are FAR from finished.  

Troll on.

Well isn't it released soon anyway? Thought I read the dev say that it would have bugs but would be released

So we'll see for ourselves

what's going on?

Let's get a bunch of candidates the community can trust and let's bring it to a vote on someone to do a trusted test.

Agreed. But you know what will happen next? "UH we need to see the code for the Block Explorer, we think it is manipulating the results"

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.  Unless the dev has a reply to this it does seem somewhat fishy.  Nothing against the dev or the XC coin team, but you must understand that people have been burned many times.  I'll give you guys the benefit of the doubt for now.  I'll sell a portion of my holdings now and wait this out.

(Minor crash incoming please don't start panic-ing)

HOw about you guys open the hood on ur darksend instead of beeing here ?

Is this right mixer txid ?

Looks like normal one..

He sent 22.

Tx splitted to 11.49 + 10.50.

Hmm - 2x fee.

sooo lets do it , bring explorer and we are going to be fixed with that

That's why I'm asking for a testnet block explorer!
For that exact concern. Thank you for bringing it to everyone's attention.

Let me guess the outcome. "Trusted" community members are going to conclude that the implementation works remarkably well, followed by a bunch of screenshots, tweets and blog posts. Regular Joe however won't get access to any instructions or wallet to verify that himself.

So to prove that this is sketchy let's take evtrmm's screenshot as reference:


launch wallet in testnet
> qtx11coin-qt.exe -testnet

launch debug window after syncing

type

> gettransaction f7fabf4bad77f39ecf833cf4b45eb371d41bf57f49c3ef05113ebf2f268ce73a

it's going to list the transaction info in json

{
  "txid": "f7fabf4bad77f39ecf833cf4b45eb371d41bf57f49c3ef05113ebf2f268ce73a",
  "version": 1,
  "time": 1401474653,
  "locktime": 0,
  "vin": [
    {
      "txid": "d9b24d42f453c360ca48a81903f870eebaacf7e1e8250c10a58b67ea6a39ed5d",
      "vout": 0,
      "scriptSig": {
        "asm": "3046022100bad59b019c4c608b035f1981ee77f2412f897358a505e298754178995518225f02210 0b5d9f86172846052ebd6e554fb5eb66b08ea3ca38a6dac5be6f991adf0a5590501 02b63c16b0e918c690c218494511866c560ba66ed227199334ccac9534e3740706",
        "hex": "493046022100bad59b019c4c608b035f1981ee77f2412f897358a505e298754178995518225f022 100b5d9f86172846052ebd6e554fb5eb66b08ea3ca38a6dac5be6f991adf0a55905012102b63c16 b0e918c690c218494511866c560ba66ed227199334ccac9534e3740706"
      },
      "sequence": 4294967295
    }
  ],
  "vout": [
    {
      "value": 789.170554,
      "n": 0,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 b0921e5ffc3ff824b3e572af580e7e7cc7ee5d9a OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
        "hex": "76a914b0921e5ffc3ff824b3e572af580e7e7cc7ee5d9a88ac",
        "reqSigs": 1,
        "type": "pubkeyhash",
        "addresses": [
          "mwcaGKQNeJGuaan2m1YQHfSoYJQV3ykiu5"
        ]
      }
    },
    {
      "value": 10.508227,
      "n": 1,
      "scriptPubKey": {
        "asm": "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 56c688c361d217cb62729f4d5131ce0e712cf2b6 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
        "hex": "76a91456c688c361d217cb62729f4d5131ce0e712cf2b688ac",
        "reqSigs": 1,
        "type": "pubkeyhash",
        "addresses": [
          "moRnEx9drbUXfzmpWUTj2woMkv1mSTbAYD"
        ]
      }
    }
  ],
  "blockhash": "000004f7a1466d9d84b7a9c4ff76b5f02cb4dc1474070ba8c5159e8ea64ebdf1",
  "confirmations": 75,
  "txntime": 1401474619
}

As you can see you can clearly see the values and addresses, so all the wallet does is replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI ... genius really.
With a proper block explorer one could hop around, otherwise it's inconvinient so most people won't even verify it in the wallet.

Im looking for info on how to stake or any help setting it up. Would one of the fine members of the XC community help me?

What do you mean? How did you move your coins out of the Balance? Is that what you need to do to stake??

im gonna tweet some of these pics.

Testing trust centralized address switch mixer


comment by community

Wow, I can't believe it's actually happening..
Good work....prepare your self's for tonight rally  Grin
Well, this is news.... happy Friday! Smiley


How it woks,  
: want send to b using mixer(trusted).

split amount(2 ~ many times) --> send to mixer address a/random ---> mixer send to b




Look forward to aka Rev 2.

Yes, started as x11 coin.  Now it's just called XC.