Very interesting way to rank coins other than by market cap.
http://www.coingecko.com
I recently sent them an email and they were very quick to add XC to the POS list and added the new facebook page.
I just sent an email with the updated name and logos hopefully that will be a quick fix too. Bobby who I have been in contact with said he would publish an updated about section if we provided it. Teka or Synechist could you please let me know if you have any about writeup for these kind of things or I can PM you his email info if you want to send an update for the about field.
ALSO I noticed earlier someone wanted an XC website for price. I would say this might even be better and is a new feature of coingecko check em out!
http://www.coingecko.com/widgets/ticker/xc/btc
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 794. (Read 1484192 times)
July 17, 2014, 11:10:01 PM
July 17, 2014, 10:57:10 PM
I got to say the majority of holders here are special in a good way. Im glad im part of this unofficial team, even though im probably one of the smallest fish in our pond. I just can't w8 until I officially take part in the Xnode Cult(probably at stable release).
Btw im no old timer in crypto or BTC, but im sure gonna promote hard the platform into "my" tech thirsty communities after final. I can't wait till team delivers!
'night every1!
Btw im no old timer in crypto or BTC, but im sure gonna promote hard the platform into "my" tech thirsty communities after final. I can't wait till team delivers!
'night every1!
July 17, 2014, 10:53:44 PM
XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...
Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.
Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?
You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period. That is idiotic. If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK. So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.
Your method is seriously flawed. And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.
I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.
Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
POW is a baddddd idea at this time... if you were around for this coin when it was X11 coin.. you would know why. Chinese miner farms gana own u if u pow bro.
July 17, 2014, 10:47:41 PM
Does XC plan on producing their own line of ATMs? or pairing up with an existing manufacturer? BTCPoint or Genesis1 seem like they would be open to it (they already support LTC/DOGE)
XC has partnered with Antoun Toubia and Samuel Selvarajan who are working on cashless Bitcoin/XC ATMs. Here is a quote from one of them earlier in the thread:
Also me and Sam own a crowdfunding platform which is Decentralized we will be accepting fund rasing Through XC asap. and we are the first to launch the first two ways bitcoin atm in europe and Uk. soon we will be launching the cashless bitcoin atm from diamond circle which currently we introduced to xc, and they will integrate xc if everything goes right in carding system and atms. the one wallet card holds 9 currencies additional to cryptocurrencies like xc and bitcoin.
For info on the OneWallet card here is a link:
http://swiftbitz.com/docs/OneWalletMerchantOpportunities.pdf
Glad you asked as I'm sure many people missed this announcement and it's huge.
Is this true? How can a piece of news like this be hidden in the thread somewhere. This sounds like big news if true.
100% true, XC is makin moves! Check out pages 736-741 to read about the announcement and questions/answers.
July 17, 2014, 10:46:09 PM
Does XC plan on producing their own line of ATMs? or pairing up with an existing manufacturer? BTCPoint or Genesis1 seem like they would be open to it (they already support LTC/DOGE)
XC has partnered with Antoun Toubia and Samuel Selvarajan who are working on cashless Bitcoin/XC ATMs. Here is a quote from one of them earlier in the thread:
Also me and Sam own a crowdfunding platform which is Decentralized we will be accepting fund rasing Through XC asap. and we are the first to launch the first two ways bitcoin atm in europe and Uk. soon we will be launching the cashless bitcoin atm from diamond circle which currently we introduced to xc, and they will integrate xc if everything goes right in carding system and atms. the one wallet card holds 9 currencies additional to cryptocurrencies like xc and bitcoin.
For info on the OneWallet card here is a link:
http://swiftbitz.com/docs/OneWalletMerchantOpportunities.pdf
Glad you asked as I'm sure many people missed this announcement and it's huge.
Is this true? How can a piece of news like this be hidden in the thread somewhere. This sounds like big news if true.
Yes it is true, this was big news and continues to be. However, I believe the team believes one in the hand is worth 2 in the bush as the old saying goes for us old timers. Meaning... announce plans, and then again only when it comes reality... buckle up... also, a 3.3% POS will not dilute the coin as this will be offset by lost coins which alt/BTC currency has been projected between 2-4% annually. Even if there were 0 coins lost it would be very very minimal. However, you when a POW coin adds over 30% coins each year to the previous years numbers and you have serious, unrecoverable dilution, which when a coin like this becomes currency it leads to a drastic price drop, or drastic inflation in the amount of coins it takes to buy goods and services.
July 17, 2014, 10:38:11 PM
Does XC plan on producing their own line of ATMs? or pairing up with an existing manufacturer? BTCPoint or Genesis1 seem like they would be open to it (they already support LTC/DOGE)
XC has partnered with Antoun Toubia and Samuel Selvarajan who are working on cashless Bitcoin/XC ATMs. Here is a quote from one of them earlier in the thread:
Also me and Sam own a crowdfunding platform which is Decentralized we will be accepting fund rasing Through XC asap. and we are the first to launch the first two ways bitcoin atm in europe and Uk. soon we will be launching the cashless bitcoin atm from diamond circle which currently we introduced to xc, and they will integrate xc if everything goes right in carding system and atms. the one wallet card holds 9 currencies additional to cryptocurrencies like xc and bitcoin.
For info on the OneWallet card here is a link:
http://swiftbitz.com/docs/OneWalletMerchantOpportunities.pdf
Glad you asked as I'm sure many people missed this announcement and it's huge.
Is this true? How can a piece of news like this be hidden in the thread somewhere. This sounds like big news if true.
July 17, 2014, 10:34:31 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
They do, and it is small amount, but still attractive. This is similar to a dividend being paid on a traditional investments share which does not cause dilution. The difference being one coin has a small amount being added to the mix which may not even be greater than the projected coins that are typically lost on a yearly basis, and one still has >75% of their coins still to mine...
July 17, 2014, 10:31:23 PM
Does XC plan on producing their own line of ATMs? or pairing up with an existing manufacturer? BTCPoint or Genesis1 seem like they would be open to it (they already support LTC/DOGE)
XC has partnered with Antoun Toubia and Samuel Selvarajan who are working on cashless Bitcoin/XC ATMs. Here is a quote from one of them earlier in the thread:
Also me and Sam own a crowdfunding platform which is Decentralized we will be accepting fund rasing Through XC asap. and we are the first to launch the first two ways bitcoin atm in europe and Uk. soon we will be launching the cashless bitcoin atm from diamond circle which currently we introduced to xc, and they will integrate xc if everything goes right in carding system and atms. the one wallet card holds 9 currencies additional to cryptocurrencies like xc and bitcoin.
For info on the OneWallet card here is a link:
http://swiftbitz.com/docs/OneWalletMerchantOpportunities.pdf
Glad you asked as I'm sure many people missed this announcement and it's huge.
July 17, 2014, 09:55:55 PM
Does XC plan on producing their own line of ATMs? or pairing up with an existing manufacturer? BTCPoint or Genesis1 seem like they would be open to it (they already support LTC/DOGE)
July 17, 2014, 09:53:47 PM
Synechist - can you comment on any work the new teams members recently announced are focusing their efforts on currently?
Christian: C++ work on the core code; not sure exactly what though.
Rob: working on strategy for social marketing, media buys, etc. as well as copy-editing releases and shaping the conversation around how the brand and public image will evolve.
Foundation members: ongoing work on the ATM thing.
Good to hear!
July 17, 2014, 09:39:48 PM
Anyways guys, gotta go to bed. Have a good night everyone... lets hope me no worky weekendy hours... not that OT is bad, nice check, but its been a heck of a hard week at work and I am wornnnnnn the heck out.... one more day to go I hope...
Sleep tight! Sweeeet dreams
July 17, 2014, 09:36:11 PM
Anyways guys, gotta go to bed. Have a good night everyone... lets hope me no worky weekendy hours... not that OT is bad, nice check, but its been a heck of a hard week at work and I am wornnnnnn the heck out.... one more day to go I hope...
July 17, 2014, 09:34:50 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
Yes but that is such a small amount that it does not matter much at all in the over all picture. I bought into the coin more knowing that its not going to be farmed mined raped and dumped. To me PoS is the most stable out of it all. Also, if I understand it right, PoS does not make coins, but more or less takes the coins accumilated from transaction fees over the network and that is where the new coins come from... but not new per say... am I right? I am not 100% on that thinking right there lol.
I'm pretty sure they are newly minted coins.
Like I said IDFK lol.... but really its small vs mining PoW imo. Plus, to make it PoW again it would need to be hard forked, that never usually ends very well in the short term, if it can recover from it.
July 17, 2014, 09:31:43 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
Yes but that is such a small amount that it does not matter much at all in the over all picture. I bought into the coin more knowing that its not going to be farmed mined raped and dumped. To me PoS is the most stable out of it all. Also, if I understand it right, PoS does not make coins, but more or less takes the coins accumilated from transaction fees over the network and that is where the new coins come from... but not new per say... am I right? I am not 100% on that thinking right there lol.
I'm pretty sure they are newly minted coins.
July 17, 2014, 09:26:08 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
Yes but that is such a small amount that it does not matter much at all in the over all picture. I bought into the coin more knowing that its not going to be farmed mined raped and dumped. To me PoS is the most stable out of it all. Also, if I understand it right, PoS does not make coins, but more or less takes the coins accumilated from transaction fees over the network and that is where the new coins come from... but not new per say... am I right? I am not 100% on that thinking right there lol.
July 17, 2014, 09:23:53 PM
Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend. Exciting times coming boys!
I've been giving this a fair amount of thought lately, and I would say that one of the biggest reasons for the decrease in volume recently is that there are very few people willing to sell at these "accumulation" prices. The biggest 3 exchanges right now hold less than 20% of total supply from what someone posted earlier. That means that over 80% of the coins are held by people believing XC will have some sort of long term value. If I'm right with this thought process, then once the volume dries up due to the overwhelming majority of people being unwilling to sell, there's only one way for this ship to go. Exciting times ahead I think.
Biggest transaction tick was for 8 BTC in the last 24 hours, and that was a BUY and not a sell...
This should also make people pause and think that most likely most people who bought in the 80-90K range still are not dumping even at these prices... I did this and to be honest, I wont sell one XC until it at LEAST hits .015 if not more.
July 17, 2014, 09:23:46 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
July 17, 2014, 09:22:10 PM
My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.
You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.
So no, we're not bringing back mining.
If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.
+1, If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution... Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed. Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...
July 17, 2014, 09:20:15 PM
July 17, 2014, 09:17:01 PM
Who's the developer's of Cloak? Can I look up their bios or find them on Linkdin? I wasn't able to find them on the Cloak site?
Their whitepaper says the developer's name is "Z" I think Costa Gavras made a movie about him.........
.........If that's the same "Z"
Jump to: