Pages:
Author

Topic: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 17. (Read 90791 times)

jr. member
Activity: 41
Merit: 2
Hey

testing your miner it throws this error on start on my 6x RX580 rig

Code:
Starting GPU Thread 4, on GPU 0
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 0 at 000002bbc42e5030
Created OpenCL Thread 4 Command-Queue for GPU 0 at 000002bbc4615e30
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 4
Allocating big 3328MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 4...
Couldn't create OpenCL Thread 4 Scratchpad on GPU 0
Error: CL_INVALID_BUFFER_SIZE

Starting GPU Thread 5, on GPU 0
Created OpenCL Thread 5 Command-Queue for GPU 0 at 000002bbc4615e90
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 5
Allocating big 3328MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 5...
Couldn't create OpenCL Thread 5 Scratchpad on GPU 0
Error: CL_INVALID_BUFFER_SIZE

so GPU 0 is not working...
why?

GPU 0 is working fine with other miners
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Right, i focused so much on Heavy for RX on the latter releases that i got regressions on old cards and old algos, i'm restoring them in next release. speed for old cards (hd7000) is already restored in b10

Thanks for your detailed report!
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
I'm using 1x Vega 56 + 1x Vega 64 and with using 0.33b6 I got 7740 H/s on mining Conceal (Cryptonight Fast)

Since version 0.33b7 until the latest 0.33b10 I only get 5733 H/s on the same configuration.

Drivers: Adrenaline 18.6.1, Windows 10 x64
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
May be it's time to add better config.txt lines for each type of card at the 1st post? It's the only reason many people can't use jce.
Or you seek to improve --auto?
newbie
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
Bios of the RX580 ? What is your precise model with manufacturer part number ? Send me your original bios file. Will look if i have the right straps for you. I tuned my gigabyte and Samsung and did job on anorak.tech for others.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
I hope it's a thanks haha I don't understand right now but will use translator soon hahahaha :-)
Yes, he thanks to us. Agreed that problem in bios, will find other.
newbie
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
I hope it's a thanks haha I don't understand right now but will use translator soon hahahaha :-)
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
JCE-Miner, UnclWish, HardKano cпacибo зa coвeты, пoxoдy пpичинa в биocax, бyдy пpoбoвaть дpyгиe.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Hi JCE Miner, I wish on your next version will have the algo of CN-lite V7 for FREDcoin (FRED). I'm looking forward to it. Thank you.
Isn't that the regular CN-Light-v7, which is --variation 4 on JCE, already avaible for six months ?
I'll just add the coin itself in the list of known coins, but otherwise it's already possible to mine it.

Quote
--variation parameter must be in range 0-18
    0 = Automatic
    1 = Original Cryptonight
    2 = Original Cryptolight
    3 = Cryptonight V7 fork of April-2018
    4 = Cryptolight V7 fork of April-2018
    5 = Cryptonight-Heavy
    6 = Cryptolight-IPBC (obsolete)
    7 = Cryptonight-XTL fork of May-2018
    8 = Cryptonight-Alloy fork of May-2018
    9 = Cryptonight-MKT/B2N fork of May-2018
   10 = Cryptonight-Arto/Fest fork of May-2018
   11 = Cryptonight-Fast MSR fork of June-2018
   12 = Cryptonight-Haven fork of June-2018
   13 = Cryptonight-BitTube v2 of July-2018
   14 = Cryptolight-Red fork of July-2018
   15 = Cryptonight V8 fork of Oct-2018
   16 = Pool-selected Algorithm
   17 = Cryptolight-Dark fork of Nov-2018
   18 = Cryptonight-FreeHaven fork of Nov-2018

About the next Turtle, it looks like a mix between CN-Dark and Monero v2, not hard to make, but i'll wait there's a test pool or a reference miner online. If there is, i didn't find it, feel free to write down a link here.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Thanks a lot for the russian reply, so fast Wink

I'm on CPU version for now, losing time with the AscendingNight fork, whose even the reference miner is broken, funny to read in the ticket:
https://github.com/jceminer/cn_cpu_miner/issues/30

but i still want to do it, every coin need a chance, and they asked politely.
However as I said there, i'm making the CPU 0.33h with no extra fork, and will re-release a new one after.

I may release the b11 GPU too, with the speed of b9 and effective hashrate consistency fixed. I benched to be >98% rate pool side, fees deduced, which is correct. In that case, i'm on par with SRB on big RX, if there a difference, it's negligible. On lower cards, i'm above, didn't had time to bench on Vega.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
Блин, нapoд, кaк вы пoлyчaeтe c rx588 1200 xeшeй? Moи дaют 850-900  Cry
Windows 10
AMD Driver 18.6.1
биocы шитыe, нa эфиpe 30 жмyт.
кoнф:
"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },

],
бaт:
jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c config.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --keepalive --variation %FORK% -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*
Биoc, пoдxoдящий для эфиpa нe вceгдa дaёт xopoшyю cкopocть нa Cryptonight. Hyжeн дpyгoй биoc, кoтopый дacт xopoшyю coкpocть нa Cryptonight, нo бyдeт мeдлeннaя cкopocть нa эфиpe.
Ecть и yнивepcaльныe. Иcпoльзyй SRB bios editor. Taм ecть тaйминги cpeдниe и для тoгo и для тoгo. Ecли нyжнa бyдeт пoмoщь c этим, пиши в личкy.
newbie
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
Блин, нapoд, кaк вы пoлyчaeтe c rx588 1200 xeшeй? Moи дaют 850-900  Cry
Windows 10
AMD Driver 18.6.1
биocы шитыe, нa эфиpe 30 жмyт.
кoнф:
"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },

],
бaт:
jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c config.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --keepalive --variation %FORK% -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*


 

change beta 16 to beta 8. I have 12 rx580 8gb. And run 033b10

I tried beta 16 and hash very low compared to beta 8.

Also some companies card hash slightly lower. Aka gigabyte 1120 hash compared to Samsung 1230
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
I cannot read russian, but i guess you have 850 h/s instead of 1200 or your RX580 8G, so :

1. Retry with only one card enabled, to check it's not a memory page file issue
2. Check you switched to Compute Mode
3. Are your cards patched with memory tweaks, like PBE or Ubermix ?
4. Try with beta=8
5. Ensure you're using version b9 or b10
6. Try with multi_hash 928

@Unclwish: you speak russian and have some RX580 8G, right?
Would be nice if you could share your config with him, in case he can't read english.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Блин, нapoд, кaк вы пoлyчaeтe c rx588 1200 xeшeй? Moи дaют 850-900  Cry
Windows 10
AMD Driver 18.6.1
биocы шитыe, нa эфиpe 30 жмyт.
кoнф:
"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":944 },

],
бaт:
jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c config.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --keepalive --variation %FORK% -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*


 
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
i'll take a look, i already have to add the new Turtle coin, and the AscendingNight.
The last one, Cryptolight-Dark, seems to be dead, i didn't find any pool to mine on any longer. Waste of time... Cry

@vmozara
forgot previously: look at the b10, it contains some changes for vega on V8. I say changes and not optimizations since i got mixed results when testing, but i'd be very interrested by your feedback Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 251
Hi JCE Miner, I wish on your next version will have the algo of CN-lite V7 for FREDcoin (FRED). I'm looking forward to it. Thank you.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Hi,

Interresting point.
so far i still consider TeamRed a better bargain since its perf is on par with mine (in a very close range, i saw 0.5% above or below depending on cases, but maybe i didn't configured TR at best, and this is quite the same versus srb on Heavy) but its power draw is a lot lower.

i giveup Heavy optim for now and focus back to v8. the next release will be a Zen optim for cpu, then an optim for v8 on Hawaii and above, as i already optimized the HD7000 in b8+. but this one will take a lot more time.
member
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
Guys,

how is JCE now compared to TRM for Vega and CN8?

I was mining Heavy algos with JCE prior to latest "crypto crash" but now I am mining Monero again as the network hashrate dropped considerably, suing TRM. How is JCE now, was there any progress in performance and consumption compared to TRM?
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 131
Currently for Haven, all cores at 1240MHz, mem vary from 2035 to 2050MHz. Power draw: 465-470W at the wall.
Miner uptime 12:18:07
Effective net hashrate 3559.06 h/s
Devices results - Shares Accepted/Ignored/Rejected - Net Hashrate
GPU 0 - 586/0/0 - 927.58 h/s
GPU 1 - 557/0/0 - 866.45 h/s
GPU 2 - 565/0/0 - 892.56 h/s
GPU 3 - 564/0/0 - 872.46 h/s

Instant speed:
Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 475.79 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 475.71 h/s - Total GPU 0: 951.50 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 454.33 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 453.94 h/s - Total GPU 1: 908.26 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 463.67 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 463.61 h/s - Total GPU 2: 927.27 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 475.87 h/s
Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 475.79 h/s - Total GPU 3: 951.66 h/s
Total: 3738.68 h/s - Max: 3752.23 h/s


Pool:
Hashrate 15m: 3.13 kH/sec
2h: 3.65 kH/sec
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Around 3570H/s max
Usually 3535-3540H/s
thanks, now the maths:
3540/3457 = 1.024

That extra 2.4% should be <2% but that's not as bad as i expected. the next gpu will have a value <2%, i already have a fix, i just don't want a full release just for a cosmetical problem.

i'll take a look at that new turtle thing, thanks!
Pages:
Jump to: