do you have an Intel GPU or IGP?
Maybe you're using it by mistake, the 0.33 series enable Intel gpu/igp by default (previous version didn't)
Topic: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 21. (Read 90791 times)
I have a problem with 033b7.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
From 032G to 0.33B3 and above, I had to lower my mem cloks. Still, 0.33 (whatever version) is faster.
No clue yet, i droped the multi hash to 800 (from 864) and my cards take 6.5gb instead of 7.2gb. Still my GPU 0 is loaded, clocked and dont hash. And the computer is slow. Will try other things later.
HD6000 is one of the few cases were you should stay on previous version, i haven't set-up my rig yet. Please tell me what exact drivers and config you use on your cards so i can somehow bench on my own HD6950
I have a problem with 033b7.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
From 032G to 0.33B3 and above, I had to lower my mem cloks. Still, 0.33 (whatever version) is faster.
Will try that. BRB with an answer
please update to the b8, and also try to lower the multi_hash in your config, the recent version may have a lower optimal value.
Please at least tell what coin you're mining.
available : yes, you have download links in first topic
constantly updated on GitHub (binaries only): this time i release almost every day, it should be enough i think
Please at least tell what coin you're mining.
Quote
It would be great if your miner could support socks proxy the same way cpuminer does with the -x cli option..
You quoted a very old post, but i've a problem: security. I could support socks, tunnels, proxies etc. but it would ease to turn JCE into a botnet/trojan, and so far i still see more potential threats than potential improvement.Quote
No go with 33-sync on HD6990. It initialize all threads. Set difficulty from the pool and soon after that miner crashes without any error. Windows is just closed. This the first time when your miner does not start at all.
fixed in b8Quote
Is your miner open-sourced, available and constantly updated on GitHub/GitLab/etc?
Open : no, as stated in the docavailable : yes, you have download links in first topic
constantly updated on GitHub (binaries only): this time i release almost every day, it should be enough i think
I have a problem with 033b7.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
From 032G to 0.33B3 and above, I had to lower my mem cloks. Still, 0.33 (whatever version) is faster.
I noticed that speed start to flactuate after recieving new job... Maybe it's nicehash problem...
Why didn't you say so? i've a special sync for nicehash, with dedicated netcode (Nicehash is a lot more netcode-aggressive than other pools).Please try on a normal pool, if it gets stable, so here's the problem.
Maybe SRB doesn't have that nicehash special, so in this precise case, it avoids the problem.
done, online is the 0.33b8 GPU
Quote
Crash on old HD cards fixed (was a typo in my old card's code)
Light optim for modern cards on Heavy/forks
Light optim for modern cards on Heavy/forks
edit: ok I found my bug on Nicehash netcode, but too late to fix in b8, that will be for b9
meanwhile please test on a normal pool
3750,69H/s with my usual setup on the 1st try, never had this fast on startup, it broke my 3735H/s record.
I have a problem with 033b7.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580. I mine an Cryptonight Heavy coin.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
I use windows 10 latest version with everything updated and radeon 18.9.3 with 6x rx 580. I mine an Cryptonight Heavy coin.
When i start 033b7 with same configs from 032q, The GPU 0 dont mine and hang forever. other GPUs are slow and the machine is slow.
I stop the 033b7 and start 032q and ALL run super smooth and no lag.
I noticed that speed start to flactuate after recieving new job... Maybe it's nicehash problem...
Why didn't you say so? i've a special sync for nicehash, with dedicated netcode (Nicehash is a lot more netcode-aggressive than other pools).Please try on a normal pool, if it gets stable, so here's the problem.
Maybe SRB doesn't have that nicehash special, so in this precise case, it avoids the problem.
done, online is the 0.33b8 GPU
Quote
Crash on old HD cards fixed (was a typo in my old card's code)
Light optim for modern cards on Heavy/forks
Light optim for modern cards on Heavy/forks
edit: ok I found my bug on Nicehash netcode, but too late to fix in b8, that will be for b9
meanwhile please test on a normal pool
I noticed that speed start to flactuate after recieving new job... Maybe it's nicehash problem...
proxy/socks : possible, but i've tons of other tasks more priority : dualshare, Linux version, AMD-GPU version...
JCE netcode works the exact same way than claymore, its netcode is optimized (and restricted) to direct-connect to pools on internet, with or without SSL. Period. No support of proxies, socks, local pools etc. Not even it has a HTTP server to broadcast hashrate, just log file at best. But it can run on a VM.
And even if i add proxy support, i'd like to provide integrated proxy support (JCE being proxy of other JCEs) because i don't like how xmrig-proxy is made, it re-uses the (bad) way Nicehash implement their own proxies, and so xmrig-proxy is not compatible with Nicehash, and not compatible with non-Nicehash miners.
JCE netcode works the exact same way than claymore, its netcode is optimized (and restricted) to direct-connect to pools on internet, with or without SSL. Period. No support of proxies, socks, local pools etc. Not even it has a HTTP server to broadcast hashrate, just log file at best. But it can run on a VM.
And even if i add proxy support, i'd like to provide integrated proxy support (JCE being proxy of other JCEs) because i don't like how xmrig-proxy is made, it re-uses the (bad) way Nicehash implement their own proxies, and so xmrig-proxy is not compatible with Nicehash, and not compatible with non-Nicehash miners.
It would be great if your miner could support socks proxy the same way cpuminer does with the -x cli option..
Code:
-x SOCKS5://127.0.0.1:9050
Oh, thanks! I know this straps...
Meanwhile, doctor83 released new version of his miner... Wrote that he did stable high heavy algo speed on RX 4xx/5xx cards supporting latest drivers. And he stopped to use binary kernels as before he did, and new fast kernel compiling... All as on JCE miner... After my work would try his miner...
On JCE sync version I can't still recieve stable max speed for a long time... Increasing core and memory voltages didn't helped. Lowering multi_hash parameters also didn't helped. After 15-20 minutes speed can be max (but not always), but after some time it start to fluctuate and drops to about 1 kh/s.
EDIT: Wow! doctor83 made it! His miner last version have stable speed on heavy algo as rock! And on heavy mode 3 only a bit (about 10 h/s) slower than JCE. But his devfee 0,85%... So... If I can't recieve stable max speed on JCE, I would forced to use his miner...
Meanwhile, doctor83 released new version of his miner... Wrote that he did stable high heavy algo speed on RX 4xx/5xx cards supporting latest drivers. And he stopped to use binary kernels as before he did, and new fast kernel compiling... All as on JCE miner... After my work would try his miner...
On JCE sync version I can't still recieve stable max speed for a long time... Increasing core and memory voltages didn't helped. Lowering multi_hash parameters also didn't helped. After 15-20 minutes speed can be max (but not always), but after some time it start to fluctuate and drops to about 1 kh/s.
EDIT: Wow! doctor83 made it! His miner last version have stable speed on heavy algo as rock! And on heavy mode 3 only a bit (about 10 h/s) slower than JCE. But his devfee 0,85%... So... If I can't recieve stable max speed on JCE, I would forced to use his miner...
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check...I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my...
What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps?
JCE, can drivers affect that way?
2 samsung memory (GPU 1 & GPU 7) CC 1250/890 MC 2000/890 and 6 hynix memory (the rest), GPU 4 is really bad can only set CC 1250/890 MC 2020/890 GPU 2,3,5,6 CC 1250/890 MC 2100/890 GPU 8 CC 1250/890 MC 2080/890.
samsung memory strap from PBE 1.6.7.
hynix memory strap from doktor83.
Can you share your hynix memory strap from doctor83?
you can get from doktor83 thread here :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35676403
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check...I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my...
What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps?
JCE, can drivers affect that way?
2 samsung memory (GPU 1 & GPU 7) CC 1250/890 MC 2000/890 and 6 hynix memory (the rest), GPU 4 is really bad can only set CC 1250/890 MC 2020/890 GPU 2,3,5,6 CC 1250/890 MC 2100/890 GPU 8 CC 1250/890 MC 2080/890.
samsung memory strap from PBE 1.6.7.
hynix memory strap from doktor83.
Can you share your hynix memory strap from doctor83?
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check...I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my...
What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps?
JCE, can drivers affect that way?
2 samsung memory (GPU 1 & GPU 7) CC 1250/890 MC 2000/890 and 6 hynix memory (the rest), GPU 4 is really bad can only set CC 1250/890 MC 2020/890 GPU 2,3,5,6 CC 1250/890 MC 2100/890 GPU 8 CC 1250/890 MC 2080/890.
samsung memory strap from PBE 1.6.7.
hynix memory strap from doktor83.
Hi UnclWish,
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Maybe you're right. I have 1803 Windows 10 and 18.11.2 drivers... Still playing with GPU voltages to check...I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Or maybe your cards have good samsung memory... Or maybe your memory straps better than my...
What memory type and clocks/voltages you use? What memory straps?
JCE, can drivers affect that way?
forget the b7 and try the new experimental (read: very untested) B-sync GPU
That's the lone .exe in the github page.
1. Stable and fast hashrate
2. new parameter --no-monitor to disable fan/temp monitoring (the purple report)
3. various optims for some cards and some algos, expect about +0.5%
4. Fees still 0.9%
so far it burns like fire on my rigs, i hope it really fixes all the hashrate and warmup problems.
That's the lone .exe in the github page.
1. Stable and fast hashrate
2. new parameter --no-monitor to disable fan/temp monitoring (the purple report)
3. various optims for some cards and some algos, expect about +0.5%
4. Fees still 0.9%
so far it burns like fire on my rigs, i hope it really fixes all the hashrate and warmup problems.
with:
- cpu: working perfect
- integral gpu: working perfect
- 8gb rx 580: working perfect
- 4gb rx570: after pool login, the miner stopped and i got: "Press any key to continue..." message
my config: "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
any idea?
*update: algo = bittube
thanks!
4gb GPU multi_hash should be lower for 2 thread about 464 or 480.
yes, only 1 thread, and this config worked with all previous version.
I tried, but nothing. Then I switched to 2 thread mode, and with 464 values working now. Before the 2 thread mode didn't work.. :-O
This version is very stable. This is the best version so far.
@Unclwish: did at least the -sync solved your problem of stuck thread?
Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
Yes, thread stuck bug is gone. Now trying to undestand why my RX 580 cards didn't have stable speed long time...Quote
JCE, b5+ to sync versions requires more power than b4 version
yes, measured +20% speed and +6% power on RX. Still a good deal Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
On old cards. Maybe my 270X 4Gb with availible only 3,5Gb for OpenCL can use all 4Gb somehow?
Who allready have good tests of sync version - please say what time need to recieve max speed on RX 580 8Gb. I want to spend some tests, but I need to know how much to wait every time...
1st try - rise a bit voltage on GPU cores - 12 minutes - no result - speed not max...
I already explain even without warm up my rig with 8 GPU RX 580 8GB on first print hash rate it already reach max on all GPU.
Windows 10 Build 1709
AMD Driver 18.6.1
2 thread multi_hash 944
Maybe in your case because you have latest Windows 10 and latest AMD Driver.
Code:
+-----------------------------------------------+
| JC Expert Cryptonote CPU+GPU Miner 0.33b-sync |
+-----------------------------------------------+
For Windows 64-bits
Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs...
Found GPU 0, with:
Vendor: Intel
Processor: Intel(R) HD Graphics 510
Device: ff:ff
Compute-Units: 12
Cache Memory: 256 KB
Local Memory: 64 KB
Global Memory: 3139 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 1, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 01:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 2, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 02:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 3, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 03:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 4, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 04:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 5, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 05:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 6, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 06:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 7, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 09:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 8, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 0b:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Preparing 16 Mining Threads...
+-- Thread 0 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 1 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 1 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 1 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 2 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 2 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 3 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 2 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 4 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 3 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 5 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 3 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 6 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 4 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 7 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 4 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 8 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 5 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 9 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 5 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 10 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 6 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 11 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 6 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 12 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 7 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 13 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 7 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 14 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 8 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 15 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 8 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
Cryptonight Variation: Cryptonight-Heavy
Starting GPU Thread 0, on GPU 1
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 1 at 0000023faf34c790
Created OpenCL Thread 0 Command-Queue for GPU 1 at 0000023faf34c8f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 0
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 0...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 0...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 0 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 1, on GPU 1
Created OpenCL Thread 1 Command-Queue for GPU 1 at 0000023faf4ea5f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 1
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 1...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 1...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 1 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 2, on GPU 2
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 2 at 0000023faf12cbc0
Created OpenCL Thread 2 Command-Queue for GPU 2 at 0000023fb404a6e0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 2
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 2...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 2...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 2 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 3, on GPU 2
Created OpenCL Thread 3 Command-Queue for GPU 2 at 0000023fb404a980
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 3
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 3...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 3...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 3 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 4, on GPU 3
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 3 at 0000023fb3ff6820
Created OpenCL Thread 4 Command-Queue for GPU 3 at 0000023fb404ac20
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 4
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 4...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 4...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 4 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 5, on GPU 3
Created OpenCL Thread 5 Command-Queue for GPU 3 at 0000023fb404a590
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 5
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 5...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 5...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 5 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 6, on GPU 4
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 4 at 0000023fb3ff7060
Created OpenCL Thread 6 Command-Queue for GPU 4 at 0000023fbff90a20
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 6
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 6...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 6...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 6 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 7, on GPU 4
Created OpenCL Thread 7 Command-Queue for GPU 4 at 0000023fbff915f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 7
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 7...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 7...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 7 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 8, on GPU 5
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 5 at 0000023fb3ff6980
Created OpenCL Thread 8 Command-Queue for GPU 5 at 0000023fbff900f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 8
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 8...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 8...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 8 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 9, on GPU 5
Created OpenCL Thread 9 Command-Queue for GPU 5 at 0000023fbff90cc0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 9
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 9...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 9...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 9 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 10, on GPU 6
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 6 at 0000023fcda784b0
Created OpenCL Thread 10 Command-Queue for GPU 6 at 0000023fbff90240
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 10
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 10...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 10...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 10 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 11, on GPU 6
Created OpenCL Thread 11 Command-Queue for GPU 6 at 0000023fbff90f60
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 11
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 11...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 11...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 11 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 12, on GPU 7
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 7 at 0000023fcda78b90
Created OpenCL Thread 12 Command-Queue for GPU 7 at 0000023fbff90b70
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 12
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 12...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 12...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 12 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 13, on GPU 7
Created OpenCL Thread 13 Command-Queue for GPU 7 at 0000023fbff91c80
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 13
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 13...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 13...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 13 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 14, on GPU 8
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 8 at 0000023fcda79110
Created OpenCL Thread 14 Command-Queue for GPU 8 at 0000023fce3cc750
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 14
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 14...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 14...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 14 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 15, on GPU 8
Created OpenCL Thread 15 Command-Queue for GPU 8 at 0000023fce3cc8a0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 15
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 15...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 15...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 15 compiled.
GPU Watchdog minimum hashrate: 100
GPU Warmup disabled
Devfee for GPU is 0.9%
23:08:31 | Loki (LOK) Mining session starts!
During mining time, press:
h display hashrate for each mining thread.
r display full report.
p pause all.
u pause CPUs.
0-F pause GPU 0-15.
t GPU temperature and fan speed.
q quit.
23:08:31 | GPU Compute allocation starts at 80% and reaches 100% after ~1min,
23:08:31 | during this time, the hashrate may be unstable and inconsistent.
23:08:31 | Let the miner warm-up if you're tuning for performance.
23:08:32 | Connecting to mining pool sg.loki.miner.rocks:5555 ...
23:08:32 | Connected to pool. Now logging in...
23:08:32 | Successfuly logged as LK8CGQ17G9R3ys3Xf33wCeViD2B95jgdpjAhcRsjuheJ784dumXn7g3RPAzedWpFq364jJKYL9dkQ8mY66sZG9BiD26Xb3NXBMT3hTiNGd.80000
23:08:32 | Pool changes Difficulty to 80000.
23:08:37 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 236 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:37 | Accepted by the pool in 78 ms.
23:08:39 | GPU 4 Thread 6 Lane 914 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:39 | Accepted by the pool in 81 ms.
23:08:54 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 797 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:55 | Accepted by the pool in 109 ms.
23:08:55 | GPU 3 Thread 5 Lane 227 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:55 | Accepted by the pool in 47 ms.
23:09:01 | Pool sends a new Job.
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 624.01 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 623.43 h/s - Total GPU 1: 1247.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 589.42 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 585.70 h/s - Total GPU 2: 1175.12 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 585.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 589.54 h/s - Total GPU 3: 1175.24 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 555.69 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 553.98 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1109.66 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 585.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 591.36 h/s - Total GPU 5: 1177.06 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 588.01 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 585.70 h/s - Total GPU 6: 1173.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 623.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 624.01 h/s - Total GPU 7: 1247.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 14: 578.27 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 15: 578.39 h/s - Total GPU 8: 1156.66 h/s
23:09:02 | Total: 9462.27 h/s - Max: 9462.27 h/s
23:09:10 | GPU 5 Thread 9 Lane 521 finds a Share, value 80000
23:09:10 | Accepted by the pool in 63 ms.
23:09:10 | GPU 1: Temp: 58C - Fan: 0% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 2: Temp: 57C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 3: Temp: 57C - Fan: 57% -- Shares: Good: 3 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 4: Temp: 57C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 1 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 5: Temp: 52C - Fan: 55% -- Shares: Good: 1 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 6: Temp: 53C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 7: Temp: 59C - Fan: 44% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 8: Temp: 57C - Fan: 52% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:23 | Pool sends a new Job.
23:09:32 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 299 finds a Share, value 80000
23:09:32 | Accepted by the pool in 63 ms.
23:09:34 | Pause All
| JC Expert Cryptonote CPU+GPU Miner 0.33b-sync |
+-----------------------------------------------+
For Windows 64-bits
Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs...
Found GPU 0, with:
Vendor: Intel
Processor: Intel(R) HD Graphics 510
Device: ff:ff
Compute-Units: 12
Cache Memory: 256 KB
Local Memory: 64 KB
Global Memory: 3139 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 1, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 01:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 2, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 02:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 3, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 03:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 4, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 04:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 5, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 05:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 6, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 06:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 7, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 09:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Found GPU 8, with:
Vendor: AMD
Processor: Ellesmere
Device: 0b:00
Compute-Units: 36
Cache Memory: 16 KB
Local Memory: 32 KB
Global Memory: 8192 MB
Addressing: 64-bits
Preparing 16 Mining Threads...
+-- Thread 0 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 1 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 1 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 1 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 2 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 2 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 3 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 2 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 4 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 3 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 5 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 3 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 6 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 4 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 7 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 4 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 8 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 5 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 9 config ------------------------+
| Run on GPU: 5 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 10 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 6 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 11 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 6 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 12 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 7 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 13 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 7 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 14 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 8 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
+-- Thread 15 config -----------------------+
| Run on GPU: 8 |
| Multi-hash: 944 |
| Worksize: 8 |
| Factor Alpha 64 |
| Factor Beta 16 |
+-------------------------------------------+
Cryptonight Variation: Cryptonight-Heavy
Starting GPU Thread 0, on GPU 1
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 1 at 0000023faf34c790
Created OpenCL Thread 0 Command-Queue for GPU 1 at 0000023faf34c8f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 0
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 0...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 0...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 0 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 1, on GPU 1
Created OpenCL Thread 1 Command-Queue for GPU 1 at 0000023faf4ea5f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 1
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 1...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 1...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 1 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 2, on GPU 2
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 2 at 0000023faf12cbc0
Created OpenCL Thread 2 Command-Queue for GPU 2 at 0000023fb404a6e0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 2
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 2...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 2...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 2 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 3, on GPU 2
Created OpenCL Thread 3 Command-Queue for GPU 2 at 0000023fb404a980
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 3
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 3...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 3...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 3 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 4, on GPU 3
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 3 at 0000023fb3ff6820
Created OpenCL Thread 4 Command-Queue for GPU 3 at 0000023fb404ac20
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 4
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 4...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 4...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 4 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 5, on GPU 3
Created OpenCL Thread 5 Command-Queue for GPU 3 at 0000023fb404a590
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 5
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 5...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 5...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 5 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 6, on GPU 4
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 4 at 0000023fb3ff7060
Created OpenCL Thread 6 Command-Queue for GPU 4 at 0000023fbff90a20
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 6
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 6...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 6...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 6 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 7, on GPU 4
Created OpenCL Thread 7 Command-Queue for GPU 4 at 0000023fbff915f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 7
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 7...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 7...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 7 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 8, on GPU 5
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 5 at 0000023fb3ff6980
Created OpenCL Thread 8 Command-Queue for GPU 5 at 0000023fbff900f0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 8
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 8...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 8...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 8 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 9, on GPU 5
Created OpenCL Thread 9 Command-Queue for GPU 5 at 0000023fbff90cc0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 9
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 9...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 9...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 9 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 10, on GPU 6
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 6 at 0000023fcda784b0
Created OpenCL Thread 10 Command-Queue for GPU 6 at 0000023fbff90240
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 10
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 10...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 10...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 10 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 11, on GPU 6
Created OpenCL Thread 11 Command-Queue for GPU 6 at 0000023fbff90f60
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 11
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 11...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 11...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 11 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 12, on GPU 7
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 7 at 0000023fcda78b90
Created OpenCL Thread 12 Command-Queue for GPU 7 at 0000023fbff90b70
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 12
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 12...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 12...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 12 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 13, on GPU 7
Created OpenCL Thread 13 Command-Queue for GPU 7 at 0000023fbff91c80
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 13
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 13...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 13...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 13 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 14, on GPU 8
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 8 at 0000023fcda79110
Created OpenCL Thread 14 Command-Queue for GPU 8 at 0000023fce3cc750
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 14
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 14...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 14...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 14 compiled.
Starting GPU Thread 15, on GPU 8
Created OpenCL Thread 15 Command-Queue for GPU 8 at 0000023fce3cc8a0
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 15
Allocating big 3776MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 15...
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 15...
Kernels of OpenCL Thread 15 compiled.
GPU Watchdog minimum hashrate: 100
GPU Warmup disabled
Devfee for GPU is 0.9%
23:08:31 | Loki (LOK) Mining session starts!
During mining time, press:
h display hashrate for each mining thread.
r display full report.
p pause all.
u pause CPUs.
0-F pause GPU 0-15.
t GPU temperature and fan speed.
q quit.
23:08:31 | GPU Compute allocation starts at 80% and reaches 100% after ~1min,
23:08:31 | during this time, the hashrate may be unstable and inconsistent.
23:08:31 | Let the miner warm-up if you're tuning for performance.
23:08:32 | Connecting to mining pool sg.loki.miner.rocks:5555 ...
23:08:32 | Connected to pool. Now logging in...
23:08:32 | Successfuly logged as LK8CGQ17G9R3ys3Xf33wCeViD2B95jgdpjAhcRsjuheJ784dumXn7g3RPAzedWpFq364jJKYL9dkQ8mY66sZG9BiD26Xb3NXBMT3hTiNGd.80000
23:08:32 | Pool changes Difficulty to 80000.
23:08:37 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 236 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:37 | Accepted by the pool in 78 ms.
23:08:39 | GPU 4 Thread 6 Lane 914 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:39 | Accepted by the pool in 81 ms.
23:08:54 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 797 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:55 | Accepted by the pool in 109 ms.
23:08:55 | GPU 3 Thread 5 Lane 227 finds a Share, value 80000
23:08:55 | Accepted by the pool in 47 ms.
23:09:01 | Pool sends a new Job.
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 624.01 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 623.43 h/s - Total GPU 1: 1247.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 589.42 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 585.70 h/s - Total GPU 2: 1175.12 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 585.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 589.54 h/s - Total GPU 3: 1175.24 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 555.69 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 553.98 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1109.66 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 585.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 591.36 h/s - Total GPU 5: 1177.06 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 588.01 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 585.70 h/s - Total GPU 6: 1173.70 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 623.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 624.01 h/s - Total GPU 7: 1247.43 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 14: 578.27 h/s
23:09:02 | Hashrate GPU Thread 15: 578.39 h/s - Total GPU 8: 1156.66 h/s
23:09:02 | Total: 9462.27 h/s - Max: 9462.27 h/s
23:09:10 | GPU 5 Thread 9 Lane 521 finds a Share, value 80000
23:09:10 | Accepted by the pool in 63 ms.
23:09:10 | GPU 1: Temp: 58C - Fan: 0% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 2: Temp: 57C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 3: Temp: 57C - Fan: 57% -- Shares: Good: 3 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 4: Temp: 57C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 1 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 5: Temp: 52C - Fan: 55% -- Shares: Good: 1 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 6: Temp: 53C - Fan: 56% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 7: Temp: 59C - Fan: 44% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:10 | GPU 8: Temp: 57C - Fan: 52% -- Shares: Good: 0 Bad: 0
23:09:23 | Pool sends a new Job.
23:09:32 | GPU 3 Thread 4 Lane 299 finds a Share, value 80000
23:09:32 | Accepted by the pool in 63 ms.
23:09:34 | Pause All
@Unclwish: did at least the -sync solved your problem of stuck thread?
Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
Yes, thread stuck bug is gone. Now trying to undestand why my RX 580 cards didn't have stable speed long time...Quote
JCE, b5+ to sync versions requires more power than b4 version
yes, measured +20% speed and +6% power on RX. Still a good deal Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
On old cards. Maybe my 270X 4Gb with availible only 3,5Gb for OpenCL can use all 4Gb somehow?
Who allready have good tests of sync version - please say what time need to recieve max speed on RX 580 8Gb. I want to spend some tests, but I need to know how much to wait every time...
1st try - rise a bit voltage on GPU cores - 12 minutes - no result - speed not max...
Hi all,
looks like most of you appreciate the 0.33-sync, fine
I'll turn it into the official 0.33b8 soon
@Unclwish: did at least the -sync solved your problem of stuck thread?
Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
looks like most of you appreciate the 0.33-sync, fine
I'll turn it into the official 0.33b8 soon
@Unclwish: did at least the -sync solved your problem of stuck thread?
Quote
I don't understand where is this "33-sync" version
That's the lone .exe in the github page. Ensure it doesn't get blocked by an antivirus. It's a 64-bits app as before.Quote
I suggest you to contact cryptunit team to get listed in their website
good idea, i'll send them an email. They should also add Cast (good miner so far) and remove Claymore (obsolete).Quote
JCE, b5+ to sync versions requires more power than b4 version
yes, measured +20% speed and +6% power on RX. Still a good deal Quote
"GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },
That's very close to the max memory, and OpenCL may not let you alloc all in one thread. I strongly advise you use two threads with multi_hash = 464, and on the -sync version the double threads give really more speed. Only very old cards like HD7000 may mine better with one thread. Also try with beta = 8 for speed, it may be a bit better or worse, depends on the cards.Strange question from myself: i just plugged back my HD6950 that hasn't mined (except for quick tests) since the golden age of Claymore 9.7 and so far i cannot use multi_hash over 256 (=512Mb), while i got report from GitHub support tickets the value 864 was good. Did somebody managed to allocate >512M on those cards? I'm still using the drivers 15.11 on win8.1 i used with the card it replaced (a 7900), not tried yet to use the recommended 14.4
Jump to: