Pages:
Author

Topic: [XMR] JCE Miner Cryptonight/forks, now with GPU! - page 76. (Read 90814 times)

hero member
Activity: 935
Merit: 1001
I don't always drink...
Thanks Wink

It's true i log very few overall info, and nothing about bad shares (well, they are displayed at the moment they are found, but not accumulated, so you don't know how many bad share you had). The yellow log may have one extra line for bad shares.

Online is the very experimental 0.32

It uses a completely new OpenCL generator that is blazing fast (the generator, not the mining code) : compile now takes about one second but it's very possible it adds regressions, since everything is new. I tried to keed all perfs at max (even on RX550) but i cannot be sure. It was stable on my rig, but i haven't a lot of time to test.

It also introduces the -g parameter to filter the GPUs to mine on. Example: -g 0,2 means: don't mine on a GPU other than 0 or 2.
The auto-config should be a little better.

Unfortunately, it still won't work for my win 7-64, blockchain drivers, RX 470-8GB with integrated graphics on MB.  Now the output says:

Quote
...Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs...
Calling clGetPlatformIDs
Returned CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR -1001
Found 0 OpenCL PlatformIDs

�êË
member
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
0.32 vs 0.31c

7x Vega 56 rig on celeron 3855U (very slow cpu) with adrenalin 18.6.1. drivers

14210h/s compared to 14380 on 0.31c
in the beginning (first few minutes) got 5-6 invalid shares but after that no bad shares
super fast compiling, miner started in like 30 seconds

i will keep it running for hashrate to stabilize and report after few hours
 Grin
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I give 30min 0.32 on vega i get ~10h/s(2145h/s cryptonight v7) more compare to 0.31f but 8 Rejected Shares (24%) : Low Dificulty  Sad
on rx550/460 it runs ~5 h/s slower (cryptonight v7)
driver 18.5.1
newbie
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
Cheers for the awesome cpu miner   Smiley
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
Thanks Wink

It's true i log very few overall info, and nothing about bad shares (well, they are displayed at the moment they are found, but not accumulated, so you don't know how many bad share you had). The yellow log may have one extra line for bad shares.

Online is the very experimental 0.32

It uses a completely new OpenCL generator that is blazing fast (the generator, not the mining code) : compile now takes about one second but it's very possible it adds regressions, since everything is new. I tried to keed all perfs at max (even on RX550) but i cannot be sure. It was stable on my rig, but i haven't a lot of time to test.

It also introduces the -g parameter to filter the GPUs to mine on. Example: -g 0,2 means: don't mine on a GPU other than 0 or 2.
The auto-config should be a little better.
member
Activity: 190
Merit: 59
Hi everybody,

now already some more time has passed with testing JCE miner and all I can say this is hands down the best and most reliable miner at least for CN7 and Vega cards.

All my machines had uptime of 200+ hours before  shut down yesterday to change the pool. There was 0 cards with hash drop, and I got 10 total invalid shares (GPU issue, nothing with miner)

I am still on 031C version because I am far away from home so I didn´t bother with remote changing

JCE, i guess now there is already many users and miners testing your miner with all kinds of suggestions, questions etc, don´t get overwhelmed and give up, just keep developing, i hope you receive now decent money from the miner fees to support yourself/family

In the beginning I was suggesting features like watchdog but considering I had 0 issues I don´t even know if this is necessary

There is few things I would like to see if possible to implement:
1. GPU displaying its BUS Id
2. Invalid shares statistic in Results, for example instead of Valid shares found 865, just write valid shares 865/888
3. Statistic of invalid shares in Results, for example if there is 15 invalid shares, to list how many was GPU fault and network fault.

Maybe you already did this in the later versions but I did not upgrade yet

I hope you will make soon enough money to get yourself a Vega card for testing Smiley Smiley
full member
Activity: 729
Merit: 114
On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.

I had the settings swapped in my post for 4gb and 8gb cards.  1836 for CN-Heavy/Saber dual threads.  Will that even work?
Of course not. I thought you wrote about v7 algo. On heavy algo max is 944 for 8Gb. On higher values speed is drops due to lack of vmemory.
For heavy algo on 8Gb best multihash is 832 (and maybe 864) and dual threads.

Yea those numbers are for CN-Saber which is a bit heavier algo than CN-Heavy too.  Those are 944,1 thread on 4g cards and 832,2 threads on 8gb cards.
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
any have a config? for mining only 1 / 2 /3 gpu
i am try -d command not run
Use config file in wich describe only your 3 gpu's. Like this:

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":832 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":832 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":832 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":832 },
]
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.

I had the settings swapped in my post for 4gb and 8gb cards.  1836 for CN-Heavy/Saber dual threads.  Will that even work?
Of course not. I thought you wrote about v7 algo. On heavy algo max is 944 for 8Gb. On higher values speed is drops due to lack of vmemory.
For heavy algo on 8Gb best multihash is 832 (and maybe 864) and dual threads.
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
any have a config? for mining only 1 / 2 /3 gpu
i am try -d command not run
full member
Activity: 729
Merit: 114
On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.

I had the settings swapped in my post for 4gb and 8gb cards.  1836 for CN-Heavy/Saber dual threads.  Will that even work?
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
i want mining only on 3 from 5 cards
is this possible?
Yes

use the "index" command in gpu_threads_conf section
gpu index numbers start at 0

Baz
full member
Activity: 223
Merit: 100
i want mining only on 3 from 5 cards
is this possible?
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0

good idea about the gpu select, i'll add param -g similar to Claymore -di
-g 0,2 : autoconfig only gpu 0 and 2.

Waiting for this possibility!
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
Thanks for all your replies!

so if I summarize 0.31f is the best on all cards but the rx550?
you didn't report about rx560 but i've those cards and i reach 360 on cn heavy on f, more than previous. versions.

high priority is now:
Better autoconfig
fix no-gpu bug on win7 + betablockchain
fan speed and temperature
watchdog
I don't think that autoconfig option is so important... Often every card needs to fine tune...

Still waiting heavy algo optimization to stop use SRB and go to JCE miner. Until use JCE only with normalv7 algo and based on it coins...
jr. member
Activity: 251
Merit: 4
@JCE-Miner

Any ETA for Linux GPU/CPU version ?
sr. member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 253
@JCE-Miner keep up the good work.  I get the below on 6 x RX 580 4gb, 2 x RX 570 4gb and 1 x RX 570 8gb on CN-Saber.

8gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },

4gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },

Code:
02:00:19 | Accepted by the pool.
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 768.12 h/s - Total GPU 0: 768.12 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 794.53 h/s - Total GPU 1: 794.53 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 797.66 h/s - Total GPU 2: 797.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 737.42 h/s - Total GPU 3: 737.42 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 528.76 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 527.76 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1056.51 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 794.66 h/s - Total GPU 5: 794.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 798.89 h/s - Total GPU 6: 798.89 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 709.82 h/s - Total GPU 7: 709.82 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 797.32 h/s - Total GPU 8: 797.32 h/s
02:00:20 | Total: 7254.89 h/s - Max: 7263.18 h/s
02:00:21 | Pool mining.bit.tube:13333
02:00:21 | Currency BitTube (TUBE)
02:00:21 | Current pool Difficulty 100001
02:00:21 | Valid Shares found 41
02:00:21 | Total hashes 2900019
On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.
member
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
I Advise to use double thread on all gpu, even the 4gb one. i always get better perf with double thread, even on low-mem cards.

good idea about the gpu select, i'll add param -g similar to Claymore -di
-g 0,2 : autoconfig only gpu 0 and 2.
full member
Activity: 729
Merit: 114
@JCE-Miner keep up the good work.  I get the below on 6 x RX 580 4gb, 2 x RX 570 4gb and 1 x RX 570 8gb on CN-Saber.

4gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },

8gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },

Code:
02:00:19 | Accepted by the pool.
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 768.12 h/s - Total GPU 0: 768.12 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 794.53 h/s - Total GPU 1: 794.53 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 797.66 h/s - Total GPU 2: 797.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 737.42 h/s - Total GPU 3: 737.42 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 528.76 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 527.76 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1056.51 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 794.66 h/s - Total GPU 5: 794.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 798.89 h/s - Total GPU 6: 798.89 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 709.82 h/s - Total GPU 7: 709.82 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 797.32 h/s - Total GPU 8: 797.32 h/s
02:00:20 | Total: 7254.89 h/s - Max: 7263.18 h/s
02:00:21 | Pool mining.bit.tube:13333
02:00:21 | Currency BitTube (TUBE)
02:00:21 | Current pool Difficulty 100001
02:00:21 | Valid Shares found 41
02:00:21 | Total hashes 2900019
member
Activity: 473
Merit: 18
can you add the ability to select gpus in --auto mode?
Pages:
Jump to: