Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 439. (Read 4671497 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 501
I've decided to use separate blockchain daemons on each O/S, but would like to find a way to share the wallet. Would it be possible to have one wallet files in windows, and set up a duplicate wallet file in linux using the following: https://getmonero.org/knowledge-base/user-guides/restore_account ?

Just duplicate wallet files too

Thanks. Presumably this is some sort of bigendian/littleendian issue which hopefully the core team will take a look at.
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 251
I've decided to use separate blockchain daemons on each O/S, but would like to find a way to share the wallet. Would it be possible to have one wallet files in windows, and set up a duplicate wallet file in linux using the following: https://getmonero.org/knowledge-base/user-guides/restore_account ?

Just duplicate wallet files too
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 501
Hi,

I'm new to cryptonote technology. I use a dual boot computer, so with some bitcoin type wallets I install the blockchain/wallet on an NTFS partition so I can share them between O/S.
With monero, this seems to cause a few issues. Firstly, the monero daemon on first start up throws up a warning which either seems windows or linux based, possibly due to the p2pstate.bin poolstate.bin files. Restarting in the same O/S and the issue disappears. Secondly, it would seem that the wallet files are incompatible, throwing up a memory allocation error while trying to open the wallet.
I've decided to use separate blockchain daemons on each O/S, but would like to find a way to share the wallet. Would it be possible to have one wallet files in windows, and set up a duplicate wallet file in linux using the following: https://getmonero.org/knowledge-base/user-guides/restore_account ?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1001
Don't look at my signature!
Dear Monero community

We are happy to announce the launch of our first app, Forex Trading, on our crypto portal www.MUEX.io

You can deposit MONERO now and receive 100% bonus on your initial deposit to spot trade forex!

Please do check out our ANN here
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-muexio-crypto-portal-forex-anon-exchange-nodes-explorers-alerts-1756784

Thanks & good luck Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1116

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

By all means, go ahead and cross post it - I'm not signed up over there yet

Even better post on monero.stackexchange.com
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10

I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero

By all means, go ahead and cross post it - I'm not signed up over there yet
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
supportXMR.com
Can anyone explain to me why several high fee (0.1-0.15) RingCT tx's, that did not look abnormal, sat in the mempool for over an hour unconfirmed, while lower fee (.025 ish) similar looking RingCT tx's got processed in front of them and 5 empty blocks were mined?

Unless I am missing something, this seems highly irratonal as far as miners are concerned, and suboptimal in terms of how the network is performing. It was my understanding that that there was such  thing as 'fee priority', but in this instance that does not appear to be the case / is not working as it should.

The tx's concerned were eventually mined in blocks 1226464 and 1226465, and the first 3 characters of the ones i was watching were 230, 2ac, d76 and 56c. The latter was mined in 1226465 and had a fee of 0.15 for a size of 14kb, the others in 1226464 with a fee of 0.1 and sizes of 13kb. Input/output were 2/2,9/2,3/2 and 6/2 respectively.

http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226464
http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226465

http://imgur.com/8EvtEss - mempool screenshot

Looking forward to an explanation that will deepen my understanding of how the network functions

Thanks

Edited to add more details
I can't answer it, but I would love to see that question posted on /r/monero
member
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
Can anyone explain to me why several high fee (0.1-0.15) RingCT tx's, that did not look abnormal, sat in the mempool for over an hour unconfirmed, while lower fee (.025 ish) similar looking RingCT tx's got processed in front of them and 5 empty blocks were mined?

Unless I am missing something, this seems highly irratonal as far as miners are concerned, and suboptimal in terms of how the network is performing. It was my understanding that that there was such  thing as 'fee priority', but in this instance that does not appear to be the case / is not working as it should.

The tx's concerned were eventually mined in blocks 1226464 and 1226465, and the first 3 characters of the ones i was watching were 230, 2ac, d76 and 56c. The latter was mined in 1226465 and had a fee of 0.15 for a size of 14kb, the others in 1226464 with a fee of 0.1 and sizes of 13kb. Input/output were 2/2,9/2,3/2 and 6/2 respectively.

http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226464
http://blox.supportxmr.com/block/1226465

http://imgur.com/8EvtEss - mempool screenshot

Looking forward to an explanation that will deepen my understanding of how the network functions

Thanks

Edited to add more details
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
I've added direct mining to Poloniex payment ids to https://xmr.suprnova.cc as well now
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 260
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..

Please don't use minergate. Minergate is evil and will destroy monero.

do you have a link to them? ...

id like to see please ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 2242
Merit: 3523
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
I'll add it to the list on moneropoo(l)s.com - where's the pool located?

UK London it seems (138.68.147.156)
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 100
supportXMR.com
ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
I'll add it to the list on moneropoo(l)s.com - where's the pool located?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..

Please don't use minergate. Minergate is evil and will destroy monero.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Well this is Moero XMR is really surprising me. I was trying to make maximum but I dont have resources so i was start mining this through minergate slowly and this is giving me some nice short payouts. I will use GPU in near future soon to increase the limit and payouts..
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Code:
Our Pool
Hash Rate: 0.00 H/sec
Block Found: Never
Connected Miners: 0
Total Fee: 1.2 %
Block Found Every: Infinity years (est.)

There are a few things wrong here that you might want to address. Wink
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
ahaha sorry i have loose my L http://xmr.foreverpool.org  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Never saw such a crappy wallet as monero ... shame.

Riiiiight.... Run along now, I think dash is calling you? Cheesy
full member
Activity: 232
Merit: 100
Never saw such a crappy wallet as monero ... shame.
Jump to: