Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 1076. (Read 3314343 times)

full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
September 16, 2016, 01:26:05 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing. He looked for the whole acceptance and the site doesnt limit to this number of pages. So 1.8% is correct. Everyone here can prove it by himself

It's comon logic, price goes down and the average drug dealer has no incentive to accept Monero. Why? Bc he has absolutely NO clue about the fundamentals, he prolly only read the Mainstream news and that's it. Wait for the bottom to turn in with some weeks of confirmation and watch the acceptance grow. Stop being so short minded plz, i like your critical attitude, but this is pure FUD.

I totally agree to you. I dont fight against anyone here. I just share my thoughts and for the moment i think for us as a collective that short is better. I mean we are here like ~10 active people. We dont dominate the market so we can help us cause we dont play against each other here.

HODL

sorry bro
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 16, 2016, 01:24:20 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing. He looked for the whole acceptance and the site doesnt limit to this number of pages. So 1.8% is correct. Everyone here can prove it by himself

It's comon logic, price goes down and the average drug dealer has no incentive to accept Monero. Why? Bc he has absolutely NO clue about the fundamentals, he prolly only read the Mainstream news and that's it. Wait for the bottom to turn in with some weeks of confirmation and watch the acceptance grow. Stop being so short minded plz, i like your critical attitude, but this is pure FUD.

I totally agree to you. I dont fight against anyone here. I just share my thoughts and for the moment i think for us as a collective that short is better. I mean we are here like ~10 active people. We dont dominate the market so we can help us cause we dont play against each other here.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
Chief Technology Officer, NYC
September 16, 2016, 01:23:01 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSdcG1e9APE

Specifically:-

Quote
And ooh, ooh
You're working so hard
You played your card
So what's the payoff?
And ooh, ooh
Big talk is cheap
You gotta go deeper than deep
To get me off
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
September 16, 2016, 01:17:47 PM
Need to think long term. With the increasing sophistication of blockchain analysis tools I think it is probably inevitable that darknet markets switch from Bitcoin to Monero. Takes time. Even rpietila mentioned a few pages back that he expects price to correct to .01. No big deal, just buy with both hands then.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
September 16, 2016, 01:15:46 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing. He looked for the whole acceptance and the site doesnt limit to this number of pages. So 1.8% is correct. Everyone here can prove it by himself

It's comon logic, price goes down and the average drug dealer has no incentive to accept Monero. Why? Bc he has absolutely NO clue about the fundamentals, he prolly only read the Mainstream news and that's it. Wait for the bottom to turn in with some weeks of confirmation and watch the acceptance grow. Stop being so short minded plz, i like your critical attitude, but this is pure FUD.
eid
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
September 16, 2016, 01:10:13 PM
[There's no need to use a page cap. The left menu shows the number of sales. You can just search for monero vendors and work out the percentage.

Stimulants:

Total sales: 23347
Monero sales: 425
= 1.82%

That's just wrong.  [Firstly, these are not sales.  These are listings.  Secondly,] you're comparing the result of a search by one process with some unknown reported number.  There's no evidence that this number is comparable, or even accurate, since it can't be mapped to actual listing.  You're comparing apples and oranges.  The page cap is imposed by the site, not by me.  To make a valid sampling you have to sample both populations the same way.  You can slice it to get under the cap (as I did with the use of trust level limits).  I don't know of any other way to sample both populations comparably.

Stimulants, level 9-10, gives 8 XMR listings and 62 BTC listings, or 13% XMR support.
Stimulants, level 7-8, gives 47 XMR listings and 103 BTC listings, or 46% XMR support.

That is a valid comparison.  Your numbers are just a units error, statistically incoherent.

The more interesting numbers would be the sales volumes.  Because if sales volume is increasing, we're golden, and it doen't matter if 13% (the lowest number in evidence) or 46% (the highest number in evidence) of the vendors are supporting XMR.'


Firstly, you're correct. I should have used "listings" instead of sales.


You're also correct on my calculations. The number of listings in each category is being reported completely wrong on the left menu. For instance, pressed pills shows 269 listings when there are actually ~60.

My apologies for the mistake everyone.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 16, 2016, 01:09:03 PM
[There's no need to use a page cap. The left menu shows the number of sales. You can just search for monero vendors and work out the percentage.

Stimulants:

Total sales: 23347
Monero sales: 425
= 1.82%

That's just wrong.  [Firstly, these are not sales.  These are listings.  Secondly,] you're comparing the result of a search by one process with some unknown reported number.  There's no evidence that this number is comparable, or even accurate, since it can't be mapped to actual listing.  You're comparing apples and oranges.  The page cap is imposed by the site, not by me.  To make a valid sampling you have to sample both populations the same way.  You can slice it to get under the cap (as I did with the use of trust level limits).  I don't know of any other way to sample both populations comparably.

Stimulants, level 9-10, gives 8 XMR listings and 62 BTC listings, or 13% XMR support.
Stimulants, level 7-8, gives 47 XMR listings and 103 BTC listings, or 46% XMR support.

That is a valid comparison.  Your numbers are just a units error, statistically incoherent.

The more interesting numbers would be the sales volumes.  Because if sales volume is increasing, we're golden, and it doen't matter if 13% (the lowest number in evidence) or 46% (the highest number in evidence) of the vendors are supporting XMR.'

Yep I also checked some listing on my own since those numbers seem so low.

Searched for weed on level 7  and found 13.1% listings using monero
Searched for cocaine on level 7 and found 25% listing using monero



Its so funny that people say that you cannot make statistic like this and then do it also like this but in their favour xD Well but we dont have to argue about that. The future will show who is right or not. I wish us all the best Smiley
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 552
September 16, 2016, 01:04:04 PM
[There's no need to use a page cap. The left menu shows the number of sales. You can just search for monero vendors and work out the percentage.

Stimulants:

Total sales: 23347
Monero sales: 425
= 1.82%

That's just wrong.  [Firstly, these are not sales.  These are listings.  Secondly,] you're comparing the result of a search by one process with some unknown reported number.  There's no evidence that this number is comparable, or even accurate, since it can't be mapped to actual listing.  You're comparing apples and oranges.  The page cap is imposed by the site, not by me.  To make a valid sampling you have to sample both populations the same way.  You can slice it to get under the cap (as I did with the use of trust level limits).  I don't know of any other way to sample both populations comparably.

Stimulants, level 9-10, gives 8 XMR listings and 62 BTC listings, or 13% XMR support.
Stimulants, level 7-8, gives 47 XMR listings and 103 BTC listings, or 46% XMR support.

That is a valid comparison.  Your numbers are just a units error, statistically incoherent.

The more interesting numbers would be the sales volumes.  Because if sales volume is increasing, we're golden, and it doen't matter if 13% (the lowest number in evidence) or 46% (the highest number in evidence) of the vendors are supporting XMR.'

Yep, pure FUD, I also checked some listing on my own since those numbers seem very low.

Searched for weed on level 7  and found 13.1% listings using monero
Searched for cocaine on level 7 and found 25% listing using monero

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
September 16, 2016, 01:02:36 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing. He looked for the whole acceptance and the site doesnt limit to this number of pages. So 1.8% is correct. Everyone here can prove it by himself

This is a trilemma situation:  Malice, incompetence, or delusion.  You can't pick random numbers and use them as statistical comparables.  You have to sample by the same method for both populations.
sr. member
Activity: 514
Merit: 258
September 16, 2016, 01:00:58 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing.

ha ha, panicking newbie...

please, sell your coins now and drive the price to 0.0139, I'll be a happy buyer!

best regards
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
September 16, 2016, 12:59:07 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/Monero/comments/52rqb4/need_help_in_6_to_8_days/

check through all his posts, in my strongest opinion, its an xmr-usd platform.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
September 16, 2016, 12:56:41 PM
really sad for xmr....i had really high expectations its still the better coin but i could imagine that alphabay will soon terminate the acceptance of xmr  Embarrassed

@aminorex

He did it right. Its only 1,8% acceptance. Of course you can make it looking better with different settings but the truth is that the acceptance is decreasing. He looked for the whole acceptance and the site doesnt limit to this number of pages. So 1.8% is correct. Everyone here can prove it by himself
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
September 16, 2016, 12:53:29 PM
[There's no need to use a page cap. The left menu shows the number of sales. You can just search for monero vendors and work out the percentage.

Stimulants:

Total sales: 23347
Monero sales: 425
= 1.82%

That's just wrong.  [Firstly, these are not sales.  These are listings.  Secondly,] you're comparing the result of a search by one process with some unknown reported number.  There's no evidence that this number is comparable, or even accurate, since it can't be mapped to actual listing.  You're comparing apples and oranges.  The page cap is imposed by the site, not by me.  To make a valid sampling you have to sample both populations the same way.  You can slice it to get under the cap (as I did with the use of trust level limits).  I don't know of any other way to sample both populations comparably.

Stimulants, level 9-10, gives 8 XMR listings and 62 BTC listings, or 13% XMR support.
Stimulants, level 7-8, gives 47 XMR listings and 103 BTC listings, or 46% XMR support.

That is a valid comparison.  Your numbers are just a units error, statistically incoherent.

The more interesting numbers would be the sales volumes.  Because if sales volume is increasing, we're golden, and it doen't matter if 13% (the lowest number in evidence) or 46% (the highest number in evidence) of the vendors are supporting XMR.'
full member
Activity: 235
Merit: 100
September 16, 2016, 12:43:59 PM
yeap. 0.0145ish *sigh*
eid
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
September 16, 2016, 12:42:40 PM

Care to share a screenshot for those of us who don't have tor running?

http://imgur.com/a/T9vcD


15 sales per page.
eid
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
September 16, 2016, 12:34:19 PM
Quote
I checked also out Stimulants -> 23171 offers. 560 accept Monero. Its only 2,41%

today there are only 435 offers accepting Monero by 23338 offers overall. So only 1,86%

So we lost 23% acceptance.

Never one to trust blindly what can easily be verified, I did my own sampling:  43 bitcoin to 8 monero, 18.6%  (Page count, psychedelics, trust levels 4 to 5, to stay under page cap).  Maybe you slipped a decimal.  

When I searched stimulants I got 29 pages of monero vendors, 50 pages of bitcoin vendors (page cap).  

  Last low of 0.001612 was like that.  Just kind of ran out of dump, and a couple weeks later, Pow!

Think about  it from the point of view of a large accumulator.  Do you want to scoop before the queue is full?  Do you want to scoop higher or lower?  You wait until there are no lower asks before you take what you can get while you can still get it.  You probe and tickle it down where you can, slap it down where you must, and when it just isn't going to go lower, and there is a good supply, you nab it.

Given 1/5 uptake before there is a GUI or usable multisig, I predict 50% adoption by end of 2017.  el rippo was right, and I was too pessimistic:  1 bn mcap in 15 months time.  BTC parity by 2021.  200x by 2024.

Only black markets matter for innovation, and only large accumulators matter for the long-term price.



There's no need to use a page cap. The left menu shows the number of sales. You can just search for monero vendors and work out the percentage.


Stimulants:


Total sales: 23347
Monero sales: 425

= 1.82%



sr. member
Activity: 290
Merit: 250
September 16, 2016, 12:11:27 PM
Quote
I checked also out Stimulants -> 23171 offers. 560 accept Monero. Its only 2,41%

today there are only 435 offers accepting Monero by 23338 offers overall. So only 1,86%

So we lost 23% acceptance.

Never one to trust blindly what can easily be verified, I did my own sampling:  43 bitcoin to 8 monero, 18.6%  (Page count, psychedelics, trust levels 4 to 5, to stay under page cap).  Maybe you slipped a decimal.  

When I searched stimulants I got 29 pages of monero vendors, 50 pages of bitcoin vendors (page cap).  

  Last low of 0.001612 was like that.  Just kind of ran out of dump, and a couple weeks later, Pow!

Think about  it from the point of view of a large accumulator.  Do you want to scoop before the queue is full?  Do you want to scoop higher or lower?  You wait until there are no lower asks before you take what you can get while you can still get it.  You probe and tickle it down where you can, slap it down where you must, and when it just isn't going to go lower, and there is a good supply, you nab it.

Given 1/5 uptake before there is a GUI or usable multisig, I predict 50% adoption by end of 2017.  el rippo was right, and I was too pessimistic:  1 bn mcap in 15 months time.  BTC parity by 2021.  200x by 2024.

Only black markets matter for innovation, and only large accumulators matter for the long-term price.

Care to share a screenshot for those of us who don't have tor running?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
September 16, 2016, 12:09:41 PM
So the rationale is that the success of your XMR short from the point you entered it depends on if the amount of Stimulants accepting XMR decrease on Alpha?

I don't question the rationale, but rather the premise, the factual claim.



Doesn't matter much without knowing the why anyway. Sites disable payments in X if they have some issue with it that needs to be sorted out.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
September 16, 2016, 12:06:02 PM
Hi guys,


i checked AlphaBay again and have unfortunately not so good news.

few days before i said

Quote
I checked also out Stimulants -> 23171 offers. 560 accept Monero. Its only 2,41%

today there are only 435 offers accepting Monero by 23338 offers overall. So only 1,86%

So we lost 23% acceptance.

I sold my XMR stock for now.
 

And you have a short position now?  Smiley

yes, for sure.

So the rationale is that the success of your XMR short from the point you entered it depends on if the amount of Stimulants accepting XMR decrease on Alpha?





Yes. I believe the success of XMR depends on its acceptance. Since the acceptance is decreasing and the price is falling for days, i go for short.

I agree on the acceptance part but I think the acceptance and price will be increasing in the future despite temporary hickups. Anyway I might've been on the other side of that trade if it was below 0.0155 but good luck!
Jump to: