Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero Speculation - page 1392. (Read 3313576 times)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
March 31, 2016, 01:25:50 PM
...
In that case the wallet owner could easily have moved smaller amounts with mixing to not be noticed. This was intentional.

It is possible it was an exchange, if so I would like them to affirm that. *cough Polo

RingCT will take care of this.

Really? Nice wanna give a ELIA rundown?

BTW does anyone use b itcointa.lk?

[1] Read -> http://weuse.cash/2016/01/09/tying-up-loose-ends-with-ringct/

[2] Why would you use that instead? Seems like a possible password grabber.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Twitter: @CrowdWhale
March 31, 2016, 01:21:51 PM
Jesus fuck, people, I know the difference between buying/selling and order book/depth manipulation. I've been doing this shit since you were in middle school. I'm not in any mood for nonsense... most of us know exactly what's going on. The last week it's been nothing but an attempt to break the trend line, despite the obvious buying interest, in order to cause a panic dump. It's ridiculous and it's failing.
sr. member
Activity: 453
Merit: 500
hello world
March 31, 2016, 01:18:16 PM
lol of it goes up they scream "natural growth", "organic rise" ...
if it goes down its "manipulation"  or "rigged crypto markets" Grin

those dumps are very natural too, real people selling, for whatever reason

i hope you didnt motivate anyone now to dump it down to 299 Kiss
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Twitter: @CrowdWhale
March 31, 2016, 01:08:19 PM
Manipulation isn't buying and selling. I'm not an idiot. It's moving these walls around and trying to push the price around WITHOUT buying and selling, or with excessive pumps/dumps.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
March 31, 2016, 01:07:26 PM
...
In that case the wallet owner could easily have moved smaller amounts with mixing to not be noticed. This was intentional.

It is possible it was an exchange, if so I would like them to affirm that. *cough Polo

RingCT will take care of this.

Really? Nice wanna give a ELIA rundown?

BTW does anyone use b itcointa.lk?
full member
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
March 31, 2016, 01:05:45 PM
I'll tell you one thing, the market manipulation isn't just turning me off to Monero, it's turning me off to crypto. I've been a supporter of Monero, but if it goes under 300k I'm absolutely going back to forex. Tired of this shit. If people just want to trash markets instead of letting them breathe naturally then don't be surprised when volume dies after a few months of action, just like in 2014.

So there you have it, at 299k I'm back to being a forex trader.

With respect, that's a ridiculous position to take. How are you even defining market manipulation?

If by market manipulation you mean people with money buying and selling, then you will find exactly the same situation over in the Forex on a scale that dwarfs the minor playground that is crypto.

You cannot fight Darwinism with mood swings, particularly as what is going on here is a trade you made that is not to your liking.

In any event, this has no relation to the underlying technology whatsover.
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Twitter: @CrowdWhale
March 31, 2016, 01:00:08 PM
I'll tell you one thing, the market manipulation isn't just turning me off to Monero, it's turning me off to crypto. I've been a supporter of Monero, but if it goes under 300k I'm absolutely going back to forex. Tired of this shit. If people just want to trash markets instead of letting them breathe naturally then don't be surprised when volume dies after a few months of action, just like in 2014.

So there you have it, at 299k I'm back to being a forex trader.
legendary
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
March 31, 2016, 12:57:54 PM
...
In that case the wallet owner could easily have moved smaller amounts with mixing to not be noticed. This was intentional.

It is possible it was an exchange, if so I would like them to affirm that. *cough Polo

RingCT will take care of this.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
March 31, 2016, 12:51:28 PM
speculation: the money was moved in response to something the mover thought was a more severe issue than letting everyone know that 500k was in one wallet.

In that case the wallet owner could easily have moved smaller amounts with mixing to not be noticed. This was intentional.

It is possible it was an exchange, if so I would like them to affirm that. *cough Polo
hero member
Activity: 799
Merit: 1000
Twitter: @CrowdWhale
March 31, 2016, 12:50:22 PM
I already said I'm not naming the bearwhale, nor am I giving more hints than I already have  Wink Oh shi- oxymoron.

Legendary could be their rank on BCT, like TheKoziTwo. It could also be their name, like americanpegasus or griffen.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
Chief Technology Officer, NYC
March 31, 2016, 12:50:12 PM
Well, then give us 3 letters from the nickname and we will do the prediction  Shocked

I already said I'm not naming the bearwhale, nor am I giving more hints than I already have  Wink Oh shi- oxymoron.

Clever.

amazing there is not one c there.

The again I'm not a whale, damn boats.

The real question:-

Aminorex == Warz?



Possible but very unlikely.
If they are the same persons, there are two separate accounts in Polo since both I have seen on trollbox with their nicks.
Also,  afaik Warz is Norwegian and Aminorex from USA, NYC to be more specific.

Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
March 31, 2016, 12:47:22 PM
Well, then give us 3 letters from the nickname and we will do the prediction  Shocked

I already said I'm not naming the bearwhale, nor am I giving more hints than I already have  Wink Oh shi- oxymoron.

Clever.

amazing there is not one c there.

The again I'm not a whale, damn boats.

The real question:-

Aminorex == Warz?



Possible but very unlikely.
If they are the same persons, there are two separate accounts in Polo since both I have seen on trollbox with their nicks.
Also,  afaik Warz is Norwegian and Aminorex from USA, NYC to be more specific.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
Chief Technology Officer, NYC
March 31, 2016, 12:31:14 PM
Well, then give us 3 letters from the nickname and we will do the prediction  Shocked

I already said I'm not naming the bearwhale, nor am I giving more hints than I already have  Wink Oh shi- oxymoron.

Clever.

amazing there is not one c there.

The again I'm not a whale, damn boats.

The real question:-

Aminorex == Warz?

full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
March 31, 2016, 12:27:23 PM
I've gotta say that the price action feels bearish, and most here are way too bullish on Monero, except for the couple of loud trolls who clearly just want people to sell.  We could easily see a drop to 280 or even 250 this week. 

The similarity to last year's spike is very real.  I feel like it will be different this time, but not in the sense that it just goes up without end, but rather that after dropping to 250, it goes back up again instead of continuing down to 100.

jr. member
Activity: 50
Merit: 5
March 31, 2016, 12:07:58 PM
speculation: the money was moved in response to something the mover thought was a more severe issue than letting everyone know that 500k was in one wallet.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1288
March 31, 2016, 12:04:01 PM
I want to know who made that 500k transaction and why they did it knowing it would be noticed? How will that benefit them? I think it only hurts the worth as a whole to know that much at least is held by one entity. Was it another scare tactic to keep suppressing the value for accumulation?

I dont see anything bad if one holder holds 500k XMR. It is bad for him, since he risked more money for one coin, but is not bad for XMR.

This 500k XMR did not fall to him from the sky, but he bought them. And I doubt he bough them much cheaper as the price was in December 2015. So he will value them accordingly.

But as was stated, coins could belong to exchange or dd belong to one guy but he sold part already. So as someone could buy 100 times 10k and no one would noticed and talk about.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
March 31, 2016, 11:32:00 AM
I want to know who made that 500k transaction and why they did it knowing it would be noticed? How will that benefit them? I think it only hurts the worth as a whole to know that much at least is held by one entity. Was it another scare tactic to keep suppressing the value for accumulation?

Could be an exchange hot-cold wallet transfer.  No big deal.
member
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
March 31, 2016, 11:31:19 AM
I want to know who made that 500k transaction and why they did it knowing it would be noticed? How will that benefit them? I think it only hurts the worth as a whole to know that much at least is held by one entity. Was it another scare tactic to keep suppressing the value for accumulation?

 Grin
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
March 31, 2016, 11:26:07 AM
I want to know who made that 500k transaction and why they did it knowing it would be noticed? How will that benefit them? I think it only hurts the worth as a whole to know that much at least is held by one entity. Was it another scare tactic to keep suppressing the value for accumulation?
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
March 31, 2016, 11:10:47 AM
Well, then give us 3 letters from the nickname and we will do the prediction  Shocked

I already said I'm not naming the bearwhale, nor am I giving more hints than I already have  Wink Oh shi- oxymoron.

Clever.

amazing there is not one c there.

The again I'm not a whale, damn boats.
Jump to: