I could wish the USDT market was bigger, as I would rather avoid holding BTC during this period of relative BTC weakness and volatility. Alas, the turnover is just too low there to usefully trade the vol by hand. (Also, once my XMR levels are back, I need to book in BTC to fund my constantly losing NQ bear spreads, so USDT is just one more layer of conversion friction.)
Do you really know what USDT is about?
...I don't get it. Tethers are extremely dangerous to hold, IMO.
Yes, they are effectively non-recourse. So is BTC.
I don't think you were very clear on this point. BTC and Tether hold a massively different risk.
They are as good or bad as the tether market makes them, and it does make them pretty much on par with USD. The low was due to a lack of confidence in bitfinex, which is a related party to the tether corp, but I personally think that confidence plunge was by an erroneous analogy to mtgox history, when bfx lost its usd banking relationship with WFC. I think the rebound was pretty predictable, therefore. Of course tethers should be created whenever they trade above dollars. Doing otherwise would be proof of incompetence. Tether supply should be just as unlimited as dollar supply. Heck, tether corp is practically acting as an instrument of fed policy.
This is not true at all, tether is supposedly backed by held USD yet there is zero transparency so that is a 100% trusted centralized setup without FED oversight and therefore the epitome of risk.
Folks seem to worship BTC a bit much. It's only as good as it's technology, and it's technology is simply failing. Failing graduallly, yes, but I have yet to learn of an adequate plan actually being implemented to decisively avert persistent existenstial threats due to scaling problems. Failing also by being persistently traceable, linkable, for which, again, I know of no adequate plan actually being implemented.
Absolutely, transaction times and fee's are completely unacceptable on the BTC network right now and it will only get worse but that does not effect it's security although it does effect the confidence level which in turn effects price.
Liquidity is king, this I do understand. It is tragicomic that ETH, the centralized app coin with tarpit-complete scripting and an attack surface so baroque it would make Rubens blush, is rapidly becoming more reliably and promptly liquid than BTC. To me this proves that there is a vacuum at the top, and a crying need for XMR to fill it. Folks talk about how XMR really belongs in the #3 slot, but on fundamentals I find it hard not to conclude that #1 is very much up for grabs. Monero is much more akin to digital gold than either BTC or ETH. It actually does the job that BTC and ETH both fail to do.
So sad and so true, the infrastructure should be mature enough now for monero to step in and fill this gap the only thing holding it back is the simple to use tools for the masses and of course the non-profesionalism of fluffy really put a ding in the faith in the dev team even though he is but one member. Makeing one person the face of this project was a mistake,
But, there I go again. Always early to every war. So un-American of me.
I do wish we lived in a world where people cared more about truth and less about group-think, hype, thoughtless habit, and sucking up to the alpha dog. For one thing, rational actor models would work so much better!
W0rd.
[/quote]