Topic: [XMR] vs [BBR] - Fight!! - CryptoNote War - page 4. (Read 6457 times)
I have the impression that XMR has more developers than BBR. But it may not matter.
Wait.
Is it true?
Is it true?
Cool trolling bro. So the lies and propaganda shit you were told to buy this shit coin is what you are now passing on in hopes others will buy similar shit.
Who are the 10 developers? Can you show me which developers we are talking about and what their commits are ? and that too on a coin which is a simple shit clone.
MMM no mmkay. It has 3 developers who have pushed code and are working with zoidberg, but obviously he has more command and knowledge. And more are joining.
You can continue shilling for your shit coin. No lies please, we are internets.
Who are the 10 developers? Can you show me which developers we are talking about and what their commits are ? and that too on a coin which is a simple shit clone.
MMM no mmkay. It has 3 developers who have pushed code and are working with zoidberg, but obviously he has more command and knowledge. And more are joining.
You can continue shilling for your shit coin. No lies please, we are internets.
Check GitHub (although it only shows details for master on both repos, so commits to other branches won't be represented)
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/graphs/contributors
I did. It doesn't tell what is going on does it? (and you knew that already anyways) For example we all know you are not a developer., neither is David Latapie (whose job is to suck Risto and is now planted in Malla), or othe, or smooth or eizh or Noodle (whose initial miner optimizations were great appreciate, no offence Noodle). That takes out 6 of you from 7 "core team". Other names come from the forks like the BCN developer amjuarez is listed a contributor.
Only tacotime is a developer and some of the other commits are from paid outsourced people which BBR can also get if they want. Only they don't, the people committing are doing it for free for the love of code and the BBR project. Those who like the coin can contribute anytime. They are being led by the best developer of CryptoNote to help them and help each other.
The rest of you want money via dev funds to pay more outsourced work and maybe pocket some yourself for trolling the forums 24x7 and call it core team. Shameless pricks.
The era of lying through your teeth to get dumb newbies money is over. You lying shills have turned this into a crypto company as opposed to a crypto currency.
Monero will be #3 market cap soon.
That would be great actually. If that happened, then BBR would probably be top 10. With room to grow.
Why are you focussing on XMR this much? Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to compete with other anon-tech's instead of fighting eachother?
Let's focus on making the pie bigger as a whole instead of scraping crums of eachother. Once we have a decent sized pie we can start focussing on the individual differences. The chances of cryptonote becoming THE default anon tech is much larger if you have 2 (or more) solid coins than just one (also less harder to defeat, whoever the enemy may be). And frankly, I believe that battle is way harder ánd more important right now.
Think about it please. Some people on this forum are fighting the wrong fight (on BOTH sides). Waste of energy, time and resources. Let's kick some ass a cryptonote community instead of indiv coin-communities.
Cool trolling bro. So the lies and propaganda shit you were told to buy this shit coin is what you are now passing on in hopes others will buy similar shit.
Who are the 10 developers? Can you show me which developers we are talking about and what their commits are ? and that too on a coin which is a simple shit clone.
MMM no mmkay. It has 3 developers who have pushed code and are working with zoidberg, but obviously he has more command and knowledge. And more are joining.
You can continue shilling for your shit coin. No lies please, we are internets.
Who are the 10 developers? Can you show me which developers we are talking about and what their commits are ? and that too on a coin which is a simple shit clone.
MMM no mmkay. It has 3 developers who have pushed code and are working with zoidberg, but obviously he has more command and knowledge. And more are joining.
You can continue shilling for your shit coin. No lies please, we are internets.
Check GitHub (although it only shows details for master on both repos, so commits to other branches won't be represented)
https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/graphs/contributors
https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/graphs/contributors
You know what I don't like in BBR? Some of its vocal supporters. Look above and despair.
Thanks a lot for raising the level OP, because all others are so obnoxious it doesn't really lure. Crypto Zoidberg does a fantastic job, but the community...well. I can't say I saw the best of it in the last weeks.
I own both XMR and BBR btw, so don't bother accusing me of taking a side. I want both to succeed, unlike all those unbearable warmongers that can't appreciate competition.
Thanks a lot for raising the level OP, because all others are so obnoxious it doesn't really lure. Crypto Zoidberg does a fantastic job, but the community...well. I can't say I saw the best of it in the last weeks.
I own both XMR and BBR btw, so don't bother accusing me of taking a side. I want both to succeed, unlike all those unbearable warmongers that can't appreciate competition.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers
Cool trolling bro. So the lies and propaganda shit you were told to buy this shit coin is what you are now passing on in hopes others will buy similar shit.
Who are the 10 developers? Can you show me which developers we are talking about and what their commits are ? and that too on a coin which is a simple shit clone.
Quote
while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg
MMM no mmkay. It has 3 developers who have pushed code and are working with zoidberg, but obviously he has more command and knowledge. And more are joining.
You can continue shilling for your shit coin. No lies please, we are internets.
Monero will be #3 market cap soon.
That would be great actually. If that happened, then BBR would probably be top 10. With room to grow.
Monero will be #3 market cap soon.
Whilist I admire Boolberry and cryptozoidberg (Generally I admire any talented developer), the reasons for XMR being larger is because the blockchain scaling is not a problem at all in my opinion. Even Bitcoin at 20 gb blockchain is nothing, Gavin is already trying to solve this with Bitcoin and any improvement could be forked over to CryptoNote. The whole scaling problem will be solved one way or another in the future by some genius dev I am not the slightest worried it will be a problem.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
Bigger is not better. This is a MYTH. Satoshi proved this and so have other leading devs - BTCNext, JL777, etc.
However, plans are in the works to bring in other developers to build out the BBR eco-system.. In fact, I have been contacted by several already just this week. And, one of the best in crypto, JL777 is already providing an amazing 3rd party platform through SuperNet to support the distribution of BBR.
Monero isn't a better branding name. It does have a bigger speculation following, but relatively speaking both coins are small in following. There is no WINNER. The best winner in ANON TECH will be the best ANON TECH.
You have been fed a pack of lies. You have bought into those lies. Going forward - over next 3-6 months you will see that all your points were just myths, based on nothing but hype and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
Now I know you have no idea what you're talking about. The best possible team size to have is a size of 4-9 people. Monero devs have 7, Boolberry has just 1.
Also, Satoshi Nakamoto was most likely more than 1 person, as shown by his use of the word "we" in replies.
Monero is a hugely better branding name, Boolberry sounds like a brand of cereal, not a currency.
Ok. :/
Devs worked together on the BCX threat.
Methinks the crypto community would be better served by recognizing and saluting cooperation instead of battling.
Actually, as for the OP, I thought it was somewhat clever, but sure to spawn unproductive comments.
Disclosure: I own both and I'm happy to own both. My holdings are in pretty close proportion to the market caps, so I own more Monero.
Methinks the crypto community would be better served by recognizing and saluting cooperation instead of battling.
Actually, as for the OP, I thought it was somewhat clever, but sure to spawn unproductive comments.
Disclosure: I own both and I'm happy to own both. My holdings are in pretty close proportion to the market caps, so I own more Monero.
Whilist I admire Boolberry and cryptozoidberg (Generally I admire any talented developer), the reasons for XMR being larger is because the blockchain scaling is not a problem at all in my opinion. Even Bitcoin at 20 gb blockchain is nothing, Gavin is already trying to solve this with Bitcoin and any improvement could be forked over to CryptoNote. The whole scaling problem will be solved one way or another in the future by some genius dev I am not the slightest worried it will be a problem.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
Bigger is not better. This is a MYTH. Satoshi proved this and so have other leading devs - BTCNext, JL777, etc.
However, plans are in the works to bring in other developers to build out the BBR eco-system.. In fact, I have been contacted by several already just this week. And, one of the best in crypto, JL777 is already providing an amazing 3rd party platform through SuperNet to support the distribution of BBR.
Monero isn't a better branding name. It does have a bigger speculation following, but relatively speaking both coins are small in following. There is no WINNER. The best winner in ANON TECH will be the best ANON TECH.
You have been fed a pack of lies. You have bought into those lies. Going forward - over next 3-6 months you will see that all your points were just myths, based on nothing but hype and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
Now I know you have no idea what you're talking about. The best possible team size to have is a size of 4-9 people. Monero devs have 7, Boolberry has just 1.
Also, Satoshi Nakamoto was most likely more than 1 person, as shown by his use of the word "we" in replies.
Monero is a hugely better branding name, Boolberry sounds like a brand of cereal, not a currency.
Bigger is not better. This is a MYTH. Satoshi proved this and so have other leading devs - BTCNext, JL777, etc.
If you dont think the developer is the most important part of the coin and community, then this may explain why you are buying XMR and not BBR.
Monero isn't a better branding name. It does have a bigger speculation following, but relatively speaking both coins are small in following. There is no WINNER. The best winner in ANON TECH will be the best ANON TECH.
Monero being the best name is subjective, although I am sure many agree with me on this one. The best anon tech is CryptoNote already, I don't think any small changes here and there s going to make such a difference in the future 2 years from now or so. It all comes down to what the market choose and looks like we already have a winner here considering the market cap and developers backing it.If you think these "changes" are small or the fact that 1 developer has out developed 7? 10? (I thought it was 7, but whatever) is not an issue, it probably explains why you are buying XMR and not BBR.
You have been fed a pack of lies. You have bought into those lies. Going forward - over next 3-6 months you will see that all your points were just myths, based on nothing but hype and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
Bring it on. I have picked my favorite already. But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
If you are just sticking to you guns because you "picked a favorite" already then it probably explains...well you know.
Bigger is not better. This is a MYTH. Satoshi proved this and so have other leading devs - BTCNext, JL777, etc.
Monero isn't a better branding name. It does have a bigger speculation following, but relatively speaking both coins are small in following. There is no WINNER. The best winner in ANON TECH will be the best ANON TECH.
Monero being the best name is subjective, although I am sure many agree with me on this one. The best anon tech is CryptoNote already, I don't think any small changes here and there s going to make such a difference in the future 2 years from now or so. It all comes down to what the market choose and looks like we already have a winner here considering the market cap and developers backing it.You have been fed a pack of lies. You have bought into those lies. Going forward - over next 3-6 months you will see that all your points were just myths, based on nothing but hype and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
Bring it on. I have picked my favorite already. But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
BBR has a worse name tho 
Not really. And this is about as weak of an argument for a Anon Tech coin as you can possibly have. In fact, it makes XMR look weak to talk about BBR's name. Come up with something substantial.
Lol plus blueberry name
This is the best you can do? Lol. Really? Ok.
Whilist I admire Boolberry and cryptozoidberg (Generally I admire any talented developer), the reasons for XMR being larger is because the blockchain scaling is not a problem at all in my opinion. Even Bitcoin at 20 gb blockchain is nothing, Gavin is already trying to solve this with Bitcoin and any improvement could be forked over to CryptoNote. The whole scaling problem will be solved one way or another in the future by some genius dev I am not the slightest worried it will be a problem.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
Bigger is not better. This is a MYTH. Satoshi proved this and so have other leading devs - BTCNext, JL777, etc.
However, plans are in the works to bring in other developers to build out the BBR eco-system.. In fact, I have been contacted by several already just this week. And, one of the best in crypto, JL777 is already providing an amazing 3rd party platform through SuperNet to support the distribution of BBR.
Monero isn't a better branding name. It does have a bigger speculation following, but relatively speaking both coins are small in following. There is no WINNER. The best winner in ANON TECH will be the best ANON TECH.
You have been fed a pack of lies. You have bought into those lies. Going forward - over next 3-6 months you will see that all your points were just myths, based on nothing but hype and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Watch this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=577267.4780 and decide for yourself in the coming weeks.
Lol plus blueberry name
i think if bbr had as much transactions as xmr it would be like 80% the size of xmr's blockchain.
And if my grandma had wheels she would be a bike
But she doesn't. We aren't comparing hypotheticals.
Reality is in front of you, these are the block-chain sizes that exists and so I documented it.
PS: BBR total TX 139,920
XMR total TX 483,983
= 3.45 Less transactions within BBR.
Actual Blockchain size BBR is 6.42 x smaller than XMR, and the most important thing- It CAN be trimmed by design, unlike XMR
Bingo
Whilist I admire Boolberry and cryptozoidberg (Generally I admire any talented developer), the reasons for XMR being larger is because the blockchain scaling is not a problem at all in my opinion. Even Bitcoin at 20 gb blockchain is nothing, Gavin is already trying to solve this with Bitcoin and any improvement could be forked over to CryptoNote. The whole scaling problem will be solved one way or another in the future by some genius dev I am not the slightest worried it will be a problem.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
XMR dev team is larger than BBR, the dev team consist of atleast 10+ different developers while Boolberry have one dedicated one named cryptozoidberg, while he should have cred for his efforts, I personally believe XMR is the better investment here. Purely speaking from an investment perspective I think any change that would be made to Boolberry for the better could be ported over to XMR easily.
Monero have a better branding name, bigger following and a seems to be the winner the marked picked in this race for anonymity.
It is clearly the winner among the CryptoNote coins.
Jump to: