Pages:
Author

Topic: [XMS] Moonstone DAC - page 18. (Read 33894 times)

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 529
December 15, 2016, 06:05:41 AM
1,000,000 XMS Giveaway

The first 50 people to get the Moonstone Trophy will get 20,000 XMS each.
Strictly no spamming.
Strictly no multi accounts.
Any person trying to game the system to get an unfair advantage will get a lifetime ban.

Details of trophies here:
https://moonstonedac.com/help/trophies
https://moonstonedac.com/threads/1-000-000-xms-giveaway.3/
I've got to ask, what's a trophy and how do I get those 70 messages and 70 likes?
It's probably something that's right in front of my eyes, I feel slightly retarded and I guess you will confirm that I am  Grin
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 15, 2016, 03:03:47 AM
1,000,000 XMS Giveaway

The first 50 people to get the Moonstone Trophy will get 20,000 XMS each.
Strictly no spamming.
Strictly no multi accounts.
Any person trying to game the system to get an unfair advantage will get a lifetime ban.

Details of trophies here:
https://moonstonedac.com/help/trophies
https://moonstonedac.com/threads/1-000-000-xms-giveaway.3/
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 14, 2016, 11:13:33 PM
i fixed some email issues in the forum https://moonstonedac.com/
also deleted pending registrations
you will need to register again

the birthday is also not required anymore

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 14, 2016, 10:46:13 PM
Quote

Make sure you add the ID and private signing keys to your config.ini. Otherwise looks swell.


Yes, it's done.
Already placed my id and keys into my config.ini.
Thank You.

i voted for you
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
December 14, 2016, 07:01:04 PM
@Riverhead: nice to see you here posting. You actually have two posts here on this thread, which is exactly 50% of all your posts on Bitcointalk in last 3 years! Smiley. You don't seem to be very talkative (at least here on BCT), so such number of posts here show your genuine interest in this project Smiley

As a valued member of Steem and Bitshares community, I think you would be very welcome here too, but could you please explain those "james/morden/moonscape/nexus-dev/riverhead" multiaccount games resulting in pushing everyone else out of witness list? This is not a behaviour one would expect from a friendly and helpful community member...  Undecided

Thanks for the welcome Smiley.

There's nothing wrong with running multiple witnesses in DPOS and in fact it happens on all of them including Bitshares 1&2, Steem, Muse, and Moonstone-dac. Graphene is a completely transparent chain so it's trivial to follow proxy chains and created by records to figure out who is who. Naturally there are ways to create truly anonymous accounts but deception was never my intent. The dev said there would be 500 slots so I figured no harm no foul. Turns out there was only 11.

Here is a breakdown of the accounts:

James/Riverhead - Mine.

Morden - My curator on Steem that wanted to try his hand at being a witness since he has no chance of getting in on Steem, Muse, or Bitshares. New project new opportunities for new people Smiley.

Moonscape - Account created for Roadscape - a frontend dev for Steemit and creator of steemd.com. I haven't spoken with him yet so he has not been voted on. I could have left it as a non witness account but honestly I wasn't expecting this level of scrutiny this early on lol.

nexus-dev - Created for Nikolai (toast) who has joined our Slack and was a core dev for Bitshares and currently runs Nexus Development which is the core dev team on Makerdao - an Ethereum based stable coin project.

Moonstone-dac is a cool project with a lot of potential addressing one of the primary complaints of Bitshares 2.0: inflation. Inviting some experienced people in the space can only help this project reach the potential we're all hoping for. Bonus if he gets the EVM ported Smiley.


Do you think the issue was too much inflation or too little? 6 months or so ago the attitude was pretty anti inflation but that seems to have lessened some.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
December 14, 2016, 06:59:04 PM
@Riverhead: nice to see you here posting. You actually have two posts here on this thread, which is exactly 50% of all your posts on Bitcointalk in last 3 years! Smiley. You don't seem to be very talkative (at least here on BCT), so such number of posts here show your genuine interest in this project Smiley

As a valued member of Steem and Bitshares community, I think you would be very welcome here too, but could you please explain those "james/morden/moonscape/nexus-dev/riverhead" multiaccount games resulting in pushing everyone else out of witness list? This is not a behaviour one would expect from a friendly and helpful community member...  Undecided

Thanks for the welcome Smiley.

There's nothing wrong with running multiple witnesses in DPOS and in fact it happens on all of them including Bitshares 1&2, Steem, Muse, and Moonstone-dac. Graphene is a completely transparent chain so it's trivial to follow proxy chains and created by records to figure out who is who. Naturally there are ways to create truly anonymous accounts but deception was never my intent. The dev said there would be 500 slots so I figured no harm no foul. Turns out there was only 11.

Here is a breakdown of the accounts:

James/Riverhead - Mine.

Morden - My curator on Steem that wanted to try his hand at being a witness since he has no chance of getting in on Steem, Muse, or Bitshares. New project new opportunities for new people Smiley.

Moonscape - Account created for Roadscape - a frontend dev for Steemit and creator of steemd.com. I haven't spoken with him yet so he has not been voted on. I could have left it as a non witness account but honestly I wasn't expecting this level of scrutiny this early on lol.

nexus-dev - Created for Nikolai (toast) who has joined our Slack and was a core dev for Bitshares and currently runs Nexus Development which is the core dev team on Makerdao - an Ethereum based stable coin project.

Moonstone-dac is a cool project with a lot of potential addressing one of the primary complaints of Bitshares 2.0: inflation. Inviting some experienced people in the space can only help this project reach the potential we're all hoping for. Bonus if he gets the EVM ported Smiley.


Many thanks for explanation! I actually assumed there was no malucious intent, but just a playing around Smiley
Regarding the scrutiny - probably Steem early days made me so suspicious Smiley - I was one of the first miners of Steem and there was some not-really-fair play at the beginning from several parties... For Steem the early mining and distribution was crucial due to crazy inflation rate, so I automatically assumed here it also could be the case. But in fact it lookjs like early mining here should not affect things too much.

And of course, you are right, having/attracting experienced people here will help a lot.

I have actually two questions to you if you dont mind:
1. How it happened that you have so little posts on BCT, while being very active everywhere else?
2. How you managed to become an active witness right now (no.17), even without the vote from the Dev?
This is just my curiousity, sure you don't have to answer Smiley. I am just getting some info on potentially one of the main players here Wink
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 14, 2016, 04:36:50 PM
@Riverhead: nice to see you here posting. You actually have two posts here on this thread, which is exactly 50% of all your posts on Bitcointalk in last 3 years! Smiley. You don't seem to be very talkative (at least here on BCT), so such number of posts here show your genuine interest in this project Smiley

As a valued member of Steem and Bitshares community, I think you would be very welcome here too, but could you please explain those "james/morden/moonscape/nexus-dev/riverhead" multiaccount games resulting in pushing everyone else out of witness list? This is not a behaviour one would expect from a friendly and helpful community member...  Undecided

Thanks for the welcome Smiley.

There's nothing wrong with running multiple witnesses in DPOS and in fact it happens on all of them including Bitshares 1&2, Steem, Muse, and Moonstone-dac. Graphene is a completely transparent chain so it's trivial to follow proxy chains and created by records to figure out who is who. Naturally there are ways to create truly anonymous accounts but deception was never my intent. The dev said there would be 500 slots so I figured no harm no foul. Turns out there was only 11.

Here is a breakdown of the accounts:

James/Riverhead - Mine.

Morden - My curator on Steem that wanted to try his hand at being a witness since he has no chance of getting in on Steem, Muse, or Bitshares. New project new opportunities for new people Smiley.

Moonscape - Account created for Roadscape - a frontend dev for Steemit and creator of steemd.com. I haven't spoken with him yet so he has not been voted on. I could have left it as a non witness account but honestly I wasn't expecting this level of scrutiny this early on lol.

nexus-dev - Created for Nikolai (toast) who has joined our Slack and was a core dev for Bitshares and currently runs Nexus Development which is the core dev team on Makerdao - an Ethereum based stable coin project.

Moonstone-dac is a cool project with a lot of potential addressing one of the primary complaints of Bitshares 2.0: inflation. Inviting some experienced people in the space can only help this project reach the potential we're all hoping for. Bonus if he gets the EVM ported Smiley.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
December 14, 2016, 03:47:11 PM
PM moonstonedac with your email and you will get a invite link

Thanks! Will do. Not that I am eager to have even more places to post and read (I really dislike Slack in general), but could be useful to be more informed...
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
December 14, 2016, 02:27:51 PM
Quote

Make sure you add the ID and private signing keys to your config.ini. Otherwise looks swell.


Yes, it's done.
Already placed my id and keys into my config.ini.
Thank You.
hero member
Activity: 598
Merit: 500
December 14, 2016, 03:41:59 PM
I voted for these witnesses

idolacchacked (idolacchacked)
joseph (TheStuhlman)
ragingbull (RagingBull)
miso69 (MisO69)
theboccet (theboccet)
torontor (TorontoR)
sakr (sakr)
max2000irc (max2000irc)
mirny (mirny)
penetrator10 (Penetrator10)
wasda (Wasda)
yourmom420 (YourMom420)
tkkp (TKKP)
kunfu (Kunfu)
drays (drays)

I'm number two on the pioneers list and been helping people get up and running in the Slack but no vote?  Cry

Speaking of Slack... how to get registered in there..?

@Riverhead: nice to see you here posting. You actually have two posts here on this thread, which is exactly 50% of all your posts on Bitcointalk in last 3 years! Smiley. You don't seem to be very talkative (at least here on BCT), so such number of posts here show your genuine interest in this project Smiley

As a valued member of Steem and Bitshares community, I think you would be very welcome here too, but could you please explain those "james/morden/moonscape/nexus-dev/riverhead" multiaccount games resulting in pushing everyone else out of witness list? This is not a behaviour one would expect from a friendly and helpful community member...  Undecided

PM moonstonedac with your email and you will get a invite to slack
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
December 14, 2016, 03:11:48 PM
I voted for these witnesses

idolacchacked (idolacchacked)
joseph (TheStuhlman)
ragingbull (RagingBull)
miso69 (MisO69)
theboccet (theboccet)
torontor (TorontoR)
sakr (sakr)
max2000irc (max2000irc)
mirny (mirny)
penetrator10 (Penetrator10)
wasda (Wasda)
yourmom420 (YourMom420)
tkkp (TKKP)
kunfu (Kunfu)
drays (drays)

I'm number two on the pioneers list and been helping people get up and running in the Slack but no vote?  Cry

Speaking of Slack... how to get registered in there..?

@Riverhead: nice to see you here posting. You actually have two posts here on this thread, which is exactly 50% of all your posts on Bitcointalk in last 3 years! Smiley. You don't seem to be very talkative (at least here on BCT), so such number of posts here show your genuine interest in this project Smiley

As a valued member of Steem and Bitshares community, I think you would be very welcome here too, but could you please explain those "james/morden/moonscape/nexus-dev/riverhead" multiaccount games resulting in pushing everyone else out of witness list? This is not a behaviour one would expect from a friendly and helpful community member...  Undecided
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 14, 2016, 02:26:26 PM
I voted for these witnesses

idolacchacked (idolacchacked)
joseph (TheStuhlman)
ragingbull (RagingBull)
miso69 (MisO69)
theboccet (theboccet)
torontor (TorontoR)
sakr (sakr)
max2000irc (max2000irc)
mirny (mirny)
penetrator10 (Penetrator10)
wasda (Wasda)
yourmom420 (YourMom420)
tkkp (TKKP)
kunfu (Kunfu)
drays (drays)

I'm number two on the pioneers list and been helping people get up and running in the Slack but no vote?  Cry
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
December 14, 2016, 02:21:40 PM
Can anyone help me test the upcoming forum?

Also, if you have community management experience, i can make you a moderator.
I will also allocate 1,000,000 XMS for forum rewards.

The forum is still in testing and I will erase all posts before going live.

https://moonstonedac.com/
A small piece of feedback:
making the Date of Birth mandatory is a little bit too much I think Smiley
Your site is not an adult site (and is not supposed to contain adult material), so why to force members to enter their birthday.? Smiley
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
December 14, 2016, 01:42:17 PM
Hi Dev,

Is this ok for my node to be a witness?

unlocked >>> get_witness jthor
get_witness jthor
{
  "id": "1.6.45",
  "witness_account": "1.2.67",
  "last_aslot": 0,
  "signing_key": "xxxxxxxx",
  "vote_id": "1:56",
  "total_votes": 0,
  "url": "xxxxxxxx",
  "total_missed": 0,
  "last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}

Thank You.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
December 14, 2016, 02:19:37 PM
Hi Dev,

Is this ok for my node to be a witness?

unlocked >>> get_witness jthor
get_witness jthor
{
  "id": "1.6.45",
  "witness_account": "1.2.67",
  "last_aslot": 0,
  "signing_key": "xxxxxxxx",
  "vote_id": "1:56",
  "total_votes": 0,
  "url": "xxxxxxxx",
  "total_missed": 0,
  "last_confirmed_block_num": 0
}

Thank You.

Make sure you add the ID and private signing keys to your config.ini. Otherwise looks swell.
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 500
December 14, 2016, 01:35:30 PM
Dev thanks for quick solution it look now more fair then it was.As for voting still something wrong just voted from cli (as always) for one guy after min for second guy ,but it looks like second guy took place of the first.Mayby that was to fast ,mayby one vote for 4 hours ?

can you try doing it on the web wallet if the behavior is still the same?

Ok i tried and nothing got only 5 witnesses can not have more ,but none of my old votes disappeared.I will try something else 1 add user to my approved witnesses in 4 hours.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 14, 2016, 01:13:33 PM
Can anyone help me test the upcoming forum?

Also, if you have community management experience, i can make you a moderator.
I will also allocate 1,000,000 XMS for forum rewards.

The forum is still in testing and I will erase all posts before going live.

https://moonstonedac.com/
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1073
December 14, 2016, 12:55:37 PM
Dev thanks for quick solution it look now more fair then it was.As for voting still something wrong just voted from cli (as always) for one guy after min for second guy ,but it looks like second guy took place of the first.Mayby that was to fast ,mayby one vote for 4 hours ?

It looks like voting from CLI has issues. Only the last voted person + your own witness are shown on GUI if voted from CLI. I switched to using the GUI for voting - only this way I can have more than just 2 last votes actually shown. So GUI voting looks to be working well.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
December 14, 2016, 12:53:40 PM
Dev thanks for quick solution it look now more fair then it was.As for voting still something wrong just voted from cli (as always) for one guy after min for second guy ,but it looks like second guy took place of the first.Mayby that was to fast ,mayby one vote for 4 hours ?

can you try doing it on the web wallet if the behavior is still the same?
sr. member
Activity: 405
Merit: 500
December 14, 2016, 12:46:41 PM
Dev thanks for quick solution it look now more fair then it was.As for voting still something wrong just voted from cli (as always) for one guy after min for second guy ,but it looks like second guy took place of the first.Mayby that was to fast ,mayby one vote for 4 hours ?
Pages:
Jump to: