I got that when i : git pull
error: The requested URL returned error: 503 while accessing https://bitbucket.org/pankkake/mikaelh2-primecoin.git/info/refs
fatal: HTTP request failed
Too many connections already, or i do something wrong?
Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin High Performance | HP14 released! - page 94. (Read 397616 times)
Huh. If this chart is correct, me and a friend are collectively mining 10% of all blocks in the past 24 hours. Kind of cool to be a big fish for once.
Sunny and Mikael are going to be seeing a huge donation from me if this goes well.
You're claiming you found 400 blocks in the last 24 hours? Sunny and Mikael are going to be seeing a huge donation from me if this goes well.
Huh. If this chart is correct, me and a friend are collectively mining 10% of all blocks in the past 24 hours. Kind of cool to be a big fish for once.
Sunny and Mikael are going to be seeing a huge donation from me if this goes well.
Sunny and Mikael are going to be seeing a huge donation from me if this goes well.
How many address before the wallet diverge?
If it is the same as bitcoin, the default keypool size is 100 keys.
WOW, already getting flooded with PMs.
Take off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
then maybe stop broadcasting it just to bragTake off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
Edit: Also you imply VPS's are no longer profitable, when it appears you could simply duplicate what you're doing w/ vps so I'm not clear how its not equally profitable, unless you're using someone else's server in a datacenter whose resources are paid by someone else.
May I ask how to use a lot computers calculation at one wallet? Any mining client can be use? I don't understand how can you have 600K PPS in one wallet? Please share some idea to us. Thanks.
By putting the same wallet.dat on each of the clients. Then you can just watch the transaction history from one client.
Right up until your keypool runs out and your wallets diverge.
I'm not worried about you. Just about people who might not know that it's not as simple as you made it sound.
How many address before the wallet diverge?
WOW, already getting flooded with PMs.
Take off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
then maybe stop broadcasting it just to bragTake off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
Edit: Also you imply VPS's are no longer profitable, when it appears you could simply duplicate what you're doing w/ vps so I'm not clear how its not equally profitable, unless you're using someone else's server in a datacenter whose resources are paid by someone else.
May I ask how to use a lot computers calculation at one wallet? Any mining client can be use? I don't understand how can you have 600K PPS in one wallet? Please share some idea to us. Thanks.
By putting the same wallet.dat on each of the clients. Then you can just watch the transaction history from one client.
Right up until your keypool runs out and your wallets diverge.
WOW, already getting flooded with PMs.
Take off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
then maybe stop broadcasting it just to bragTake off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
Edit: Also you imply VPS's are no longer profitable, when it appears you could simply duplicate what you're doing w/ vps so I'm not clear how its not equally profitable, unless you're using someone else's server in a datacenter whose resources are paid by someone else.
May I ask how to use a lot computers calculation at one wallet? Any mining client can be use? I don't understand how can you have 600K PPS in one wallet? Please share some idea to us. Thanks.
By putting the same wallet.dat on each of the clients. Then you can just watch the transaction history from one client.
Right up until your keypool runs out and your wallets diverge.
WOW, already getting flooded with PMs.
Take off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
then maybe stop broadcasting it just to bragTake off your tinfoil hats people. I'm NOT GPU mining. I'm simply running a lot of high power private servers.
Edit: Also you imply VPS's are no longer profitable, when it appears you could simply duplicate what you're doing w/ vps so I'm not clear how its not equally profitable, unless you're using someone else's server in a datacenter whose resources are paid by someone else.
May I ask how to use a lot computers calculation at one wallet? Any mining client can be use? I don't understand how can you have 600K PPS in one wallet? Please share some idea to us. Thanks.
By putting the same wallet.dat on each of the clients. Then you can just watch the transaction history from one client.
I get also slightly higher pps. Before it was 6200pps when not processing other stuff. Now it's 6526pps..
I'll also sent you some satoshizz... good work!
I'll also sent you some satoshizz... good work!
-hp5 released!
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
aaaand compiled and running
I know it was mentioned somewhere in this 770 post thread but how do you update in linux again?
Or do you just delete the old and do it all over again?
Or do you just delete the old and do it all over again?
Good stuff
Can you see if you can fix this also..
It crashes my daemons.. Should be freed or released ?
Can you see if you can fix this also..
Quote
primecoind: checkqueue.h:167: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.
Quote
CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue *pqueueIn) : pqueue(pqueueIn), fDone(false) {
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
It crashes my daemons.. Should be freed or released ?
My plan is to try out my remaining optimization ideas first. Then I'll start looking at the crashes. I haven't looked at this specific crash in detail. I have seen it happening on my boxes too and I do have a core dump of the crash. I just need some time to look at that core dump.
Memleak?
Sent you a BTC for motivation!
Good stuff
Can you see if you can fix this also..
It crashes my daemons.. Should be freed or released ?
Can you see if you can fix this also..
Quote
primecoind: checkqueue.h:167: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.
Quote
CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue *pqueueIn) : pqueue(pqueueIn), fDone(false) {
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
It crashes my daemons.. Should be freed or released ?
My plan is to try out my remaining optimization ideas first. Then I'll start looking at the crashes. I haven't looked at this specific crash in detail. I have seen it happening on my boxes too and I do have a core dump of the crash. I just need some time to look at that core dump.
-hp5 released!
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
Good stuff
Can you see if you can fix this also..
Quote
primecoind: checkqueue.h:167: CCheckQueueControl::CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue*) [with T = CScriptCheck]: Assertion `pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle' failed.
Quote
CCheckQueueControl(CCheckQueue *pqueueIn) : pqueue(pqueueIn), fDone(false) {
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
// passed queue is supposed to be unused, or NULL
if (pqueue != NULL) {
assert(pqueue->nTotal == pqueue->nIdle);
assert(pqueue->nTodo == 0);
assert(pqueue->fAllOk == true);
}
}
It crashes my daemons.. Should be freed or released ?
-hp5 released!
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
This version adds a fast 32-bit routine for inverting numbers. I did some other small performance improvements to the sieve as well. Nothing really big though. Only a 2% improvement in my benchmark.
Official backup repository is now on bitbucket:
https://bitbucket.org/mikaelh/primecoin-hp
But please download the source code from SourceForge if you can.
The referral kickback probably made more money for the poster than the blocks he/she mined.
has anyone done any conclusive testing with the sievesize? I did, and found that 2000000 was marginally better than 1000000 on the testnet, but that was using the 5-chain estimates from debug.log. I haven't done anything on the live network and haven't heard that anyone else has either. I think the diff is too high to do any conclusive testing now as the time between finding blocks is too high and variable.
Time for mikaelh to do some magic and put out an hp5 I think
-PTT
http://ecoinomist.com/xpm-primecoin-mining-guide-on-linux#sieveTime for mikaelh to do some magic and put out an hp5 I think
-PTT
has anyone done any conclusive testing with the sievesize? I did, and found that 2000000 was marginally better than 1000000 on the testnet, but that was using the 5-chain estimates from debug.log. I haven't done anything on the live network and haven't heard that anyone else has either. I think the diff is too high to do any conclusive testing now as the time between finding blocks is too high and variable.
Time for mikaelh to do some magic and put out an hp5 I think
-PTT
http://ecoinomist.com/xpm-primecoin-mining-guide-on-linux#sieve Time for mikaelh to do some magic and put out an hp5 I think
-PTT
Jump to: