Has there been a fork? My two mined blocks vanished 
I think I lost 6 blocks they are gone.
I waited for over 2 days to get those two blocks and they are gone. Seems like a tragic story for my CPU.
Topic: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency - page 122. (Read 688812 times)
July 11, 2013, 04:00:44 PM
I think I lost 6 blocks they are gone.
I waited for over 2 days to get those two blocks and they are gone. Seems like a tragic story for my CPU.
July 11, 2013, 03:47:03 PM
Where, link!
Github.
Who knows, it could be a 1000x speedup. I would be careful before saying it's rubbish. Compile and see.
he means "i lack the knowledge to do anything like that, so liek you dont give me free mining so liek lol.. (idiocracy was a great movie, still watching it time to time to remind me what kind of society we are going for)...
July 11, 2013, 03:45:19 PM
If i have to compile myself, it's rubbish.
I suggest you wait until a shrink wrap package from Best Buy is available. 
July 11, 2013, 03:45:03 PM
Where, link!
Github.
Who knows, it could be a 1000x speedup. I would be careful before saying it's rubbish. Compile and see.
I have obtained about a 25x speed up from updating.
July 11, 2013, 03:35:13 PM
So my question is, would people expect to see greater block generation from a single process getting 1200 pps, or 3 instances each getting 400 pps?
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
It seems logical that it's absolutely the same. Although only the developer of the coin may be 100% positive on that.
It would be logical for it to be absolutely the same if we were mining in pools. We're not. There's also a tremendous amount of luck involved, hence my question of whether the pure pps rate is key, or the number of instances available to make a lucky find...
July 11, 2013, 03:34:56 PM
Has there been a fork? My two mined blocks vanished
I think I lost 6 blocks they are gone.
July 11, 2013, 03:34:09 PM
There appears to be a network fork at block#14214 just now. Please run this command
getblockhash 14215
and report your current block number
getblockhash 14215
and report your current block number
1421515428bf4b0867cf6b75a85375f6a2266e54a1c9f244befeee72ec0545300ae0f
Block 15794
July 11, 2013, 03:32:31 PM
Where, link!
Github.
July 11, 2013, 03:24:52 PM
Well done! Sunny.
Primecoin make another headline in bitcoinmagazine in less than a week:
http://bitcoinmagazine.com/primecoin-has-exchange-casino-already-breaking-world-records/
Primecoin make another headline in bitcoinmagazine in less than a week:
http://bitcoinmagazine.com/primecoin-has-exchange-casino-already-breaking-world-records/
July 11, 2013, 03:24:38 PM
Where, link!
July 11, 2013, 03:22:10 PM
Has there been a fork? My two mined blocks vanished
July 11, 2013, 03:22:03 PM
July 11, 2013, 03:21:44 PM
So my question is, would people expect to see greater block generation from a single process getting 1200 pps, or 3 instances each getting 400 pps?
Any thoughts?
Any thoughts?
It seems logical that it's absolutely the same. Although only the developer of the coin may be 100% positive on that.
July 11, 2013, 03:20:25 PM
Has there been an update to the client so far?
July 11, 2013, 03:17:18 PM
Is this an orphaned block?
Status: 2/offline, has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 7/11/2013 12:58
Source: Generated
Credit: 16.33 XPM (matures in 3198 more blocks)
Net amount: 0.00 XPM
Status: 2/offline, has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 7/11/2013 12:58
Source: Generated
Credit: 16.33 XPM (matures in 3198 more blocks)
Net amount: 0.00 XPM
July 11, 2013, 03:14:49 PM
I keep debating this based on my experience so far, and I can't come to an answer.
Is raw pps the key to mining, or number of instances?
In the beginning, it seemed like after a pretty long wait for initial blocks, they started coming in in a fairly random dispersion.... the machines with much higher pps rates definetly got more blocks than the ones with lesser rates, but not at all in a linear fashion.
So my question is, would people expect to see greater block generation from a single process getting 1200 pps, or 3 instances each getting 400 pps?
Any thoughts?
Is raw pps the key to mining, or number of instances?
In the beginning, it seemed like after a pretty long wait for initial blocks, they started coming in in a fairly random dispersion.... the machines with much higher pps rates definetly got more blocks than the ones with lesser rates, but not at all in a linear fashion.
So my question is, would people expect to see greater block generation from a single process getting 1200 pps, or 3 instances each getting 400 pps?
Any thoughts?
July 11, 2013, 03:13:18 PM
I am cpu Minning with the QT @ 2* 2.4 ghz nehalem 2-core 4 thread cpus
1) do I have any hop of getting some coins?
2)Is Gpu minning an option?
YES its random1) do I have any hop of getting some coins?
2)Is Gpu minning an option?
NO not yet
July 11, 2013, 03:06:01 PM
I am cpu Minning with the QT @ 2* 2.4 ghz nehalem 2-core 4 thread cpus
1) do I have any hop of getting some coins?
2)Is Gpu minning an option?
1) do I have any hop of getting some coins?
2)Is Gpu minning an option?
July 11, 2013, 03:03:22 PM
How long does it usually take for a transaction to appear in your wallet?
July 11, 2013, 03:02:00 PM
23:02:07

getblockhash 14215
23:02:07

15428bf4b0867cf6b75a85375f6a2266e54a1c9f244befeee72ec0545300ae0f
Jump to: