But it looks complete.
Topic: Yet another analyst :) - page 86. (Read 269580 times)
The alternate could be horizontal triang like at $49
But it looks complete.
But it looks complete.
Consolidation looks complete. Wait for breaking $100
I think its bad timing to break $100, but what the heck.. its bitcoin.
If this is a final move, then breaking $100 on a saturday would make sense.
Consolidation looks complete. Wait for breaking $100
Yeah - that's what everyone is counting on. I'd like to know if when the count is invalidated then we'll still have that one more leg up.
I can say only one thing so far. Unless we break $49 down, we are bullish.I know its a stop point of one of paid analytics, but it is obvious and I mentioned it earlier. However I don't copyright it - use on your own
I'd like to know if when the count is invalidated then we'll still have that one more leg up.
if is a complex correction(unlikely) it can go below 75 a bit and still go UP for now is likely that we move up to test the 93 area http://www.sierrachart.com/image.php?l=1364581973385.png
What would be that alternative count - in case that it is a zig-zag?
I don't know how count something else so far. Will review when situation will be on table.Currently we are missing at least one more leg up.
Yeah - that's what everyone is counting on. I'd like to know if when the count is invalidated then we'll still have that one more leg up.
Down
What would be that alternative count - in case that it is a zig-zag?
I don't know how count something else so far. Will review when situation will be on table.Currently we are missing at least one more leg up.
What would be that alternative count - in case that it is a zig-zag?
something like this ...
I was rather asking about the previous waves count - i.e. the latest count from lucif was that we are now in the 4th wave, but when it drops below 75 - then this count will be invalidated. If this is not the 4th wave - then which one it is?
What would be that alternative count - in case that it is a zig-zag?
something like this 
What would be that alternative count - in case that it is a zig-zag?
LTC on btce is bound to USD price primary.
Bitcoin relation is secondary. It just keeping its USD price, so when bitcoin rises, LTC falls and reverse.
But this alternative currency is shit. It is vulnurable to botnet mining as hell due to its Scrypt algo.
Bitcoin relation is secondary. It just keeping its USD price, so when bitcoin rises, LTC falls and reverse.
But this alternative currency is shit. It is vulnurable to botnet mining as hell due to its Scrypt algo.
LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
I follow the LTC market daily and this is completely wrong. I've seen them both drop heavily together and I've also seen Bitcoin drop sharply and Litecoin didn't budge a single cent. And guess what I've also seen Bitcoin shoot up and Litecoin drop like a rock. The relationship is complicated.
First you say I'm completely wrong, then you say there's a complicated relationship.
There is no obvious pattern, such as LTC tending to follow BTC inversely. I've seen all manner of behaviour in the last few weeks.
LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
I follow the LTC market daily and this is completely wrong. I've seen them both drop heavily together and I've also seen Bitcoin drop sharply and Litecoin didn't budge a single cent. And guess what I've also seen Bitcoin shoot up and Litecoin drop like a rock. The relationship is complicated.
First you say I'm completely wrong, then you say there's a complicated relationship.
LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
I follow the LTC market daily and this is completely wrong. I've seen them both drop heavily together and I've also seen Bitcoin drop sharply and Litecoin didn't budge a single cent. And guess what I've also seen Bitcoin shoot up and Litecoin drop like a rock. The relationship is complicated.
Correlating to BTC price to LTC price manipulation is absurd. LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
I'm pretty sure that Litecoin is massively manipulated by the very greedy amongst us.
LTC is certainly heavily manipulated, but that's not the topic.
Correlating to BTC price to LTC price manipulation is absurd. LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
I'm pretty sure that Litecoin is massively manipulated by the very greedy amongst us.
Okay, I stressed this and here is my conclusion. As bitcoin 4th waves like triangles much, here is probably the futher action run:
There you go, i know hell would email you that chart soon :p
So this is it... the last strech is near... a bump above $100 and fuck down we go.
I would agree with this, however I can't help but get the feeling that one or two people pushed the price back up to $90+ artificially and outside of normal market behaviour. Every time it started to go down it was propped back up gain.
Some of the purchases that went through didn't make sense, there was very little Gox lag, people were dumping into the bids and someone was buying from the asks with a spread of upto a dollar or two - with no lag. Normally when it starts to drop off suddenly peolpe don't rush to buy at the market rate.
It looked like someone was panic buying to keep the price inflated.
At last people are noticing!
I couldn't help but notice.....the tiny fillers on the ask w/ huge spread.....as if someone was desperately attempting to keep price inflated.
Correlating to BTC price to LTC price manipulation is absurd. LTC follows BTC inversely, and even when it does, it's not always by enough to matter.
You guys think the return to the previous price was the manipulation and not the 40,000 coin dump which set off the fireworks in the first place? Seriously?
I think both of them were manipulative moves.
Jump to: