Author

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 124. (Read 1514767 times)

hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
yeah and hes not a tipper  Huh Cry
seems to me he tips about 1% Tongue

 Grin  that's mandatory tip, but so true

Given:
No, (s)he's been hashing long term on this solo pool and cracked quite a few blocks over an extended period.

I meant that there was the choice of self solo for 100%.
Basically, (s)he's "tipped" ck more than 2BTC over the years (when compared to mining on his/her own). Wink
full member
Activity: 637
Merit: 131
yeah and hes not a tipper  Huh Cry
seems to me he tips about 1% Tongue

 Grin  that's mandatory tip, but so true
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Hi guys Need some help ........ I have antminer s9 and i am resident of Middle East ..... before starting solo mining i Use to sell my hashrate on Nice Hash where i see my Blocks status everyday my machine found more then 5 blocks. anyways it was others luck.

I have set my machine as


stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333

where diff is showing 12.1K

Is it okay or i have to change settings?
That's fine. Ignore the diff on this pool and let the pool manage it.
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 552
Retired IRCX God
yeah and hes not a tipper  Huh Cry
seems to me he tips about 1% Tongue
full member
Activity: 637
Merit: 131
Congratz to the lucky blocker!

Would that be a large rental that hit the block?
No, (s)he's been hashing long term on this solo pool and cracked quite a few blocks over an extended period.

yeah and hes not a tipper  Huh Cry
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Congratz to the lucky blocker!

Would that be a large rental that hit the block?
No, (s)he's been hashing long term on this solo pool and cracked quite a few blocks over an extended period.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 12
Block Hunting
Congratz to the lucky blocker!

Would that be a large rental that hit the block?
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1030
Yes I am a pirate, 300 years too late!
Congrats to the lucky blockfinder!!!!
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Block Hit by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY. Congrats !!  Cheesy

https://btc.com/000000000000000000a4e67b4d80f7b478c5a83afcf4ab2da64894a057109e2a

Code:
[2017-09-03 04:17:45.672] Possible block solve diff 1706914113535.543945 !
[2017-09-03 04:17:45.953] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2017-09-03 04:17:46.192] Solved and confirmed block 483272 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.134
[2017-09-03 04:17:46.192] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "363T", "hashrate5m": "353T", "hashrate1hr": "355T", "hashrate1d": "366T", "hashrate7d": "348T"}
[2017-09-03 04:17:46.192] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.134:{"hashrate1m": "15.2T", "hashrate5m": "13.1T", "hashrate1hr": "12.2T", "hashrate1d": "11.8T", "hashrate7d": "11.8T"}
[2017-09-03 04:17:46.194] Block solved after 527550640548 shares at 59.4% diff

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000000a4e67b4d80f7b478c5a83afcf4ab2da64894a057109e2a
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 12
Block Hunting
https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer-binaries/tree/master/AntS3

It seems to be no longer available were would I pickup the updated firmware from now?

-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Ok great, should I update the miners with the kano update the are all showing.

Fri Jan 9 20:41:34 CST 2015
Kernel Version   3.10.12
cgminer    4.6.1-1





If it's not too much effort, yes, there were some worthwhile improvements in his changes but no magic performance increases.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 12
Block Hunting
Ok great, should I update the miners with the kano update the are all showing.

Fri Jan 9 20:41:34 CST 2015
Kernel Version   3.10.12
cgminer    4.6.1-1




-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Have a small number of s3 miners I pointed at the pool they all use the same worker name the BTC address.  

I guess when doing this they work as single units?

Would I need to use the proxy code to connect the miners into a consolidated connection?

Some advice on setting DIFF for the miners would help also as I see they all seem to have vared DIFF reading.



None of this matters. Single unit or spread out it makes no difference, it's only a matter of choice on your part as to how you wish to tell them apart on the pool (or not.) The only reason to proxy them would be to decrease your internet bandwidth requirements. Vardiff also will have no effect either. Just let them mine away.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 12
Block Hunting
Have a small number of s3 miners I pointed at the pool they all use the same worker name the BTC address.  

I guess when doing this they work as single units?

Would I need to use the proxy code to connect the miners into a consolidated connection?

Some advice on setting DIFF for the miners would help also as I see they all seem to have vared DIFF reading.


-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Yes, but if a block is "accepted" via normal solo mining, then that means you found A solution to the actual block.  On ckpool, your submissions are "accepted" but are not necessarily actual solutions to the block.  Or at least that's per your communication.
Your understanding is the same as mine and appears correct.  CKsolo functions like all pools do, in that it "accepts" shares regardless of if they are greater than network difficulty, and like I mentioned (and CK is quoted above) this is shown as feedback so you can see your miner working.

You could set the vardiff to equal network difficulty, then you would only see an accepted share if it had the potential to be a block solve.
Additionally a lot of drivers internally use the share counter to give you the hashrate of the device and if no shares are ever accepted they won't display a meaningful hashrate. Shares mean "your share of the block reward" on a regular pool but they do not mean that on this pool since only the block finder gets the block reward (minus my fee.)
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Yes, but if a block is "accepted" via normal solo mining, then that means you found A solution to the actual block.  On ckpool, your submissions are "accepted" but are not necessarily actual solutions to the block.  Or at least that's per your communication.
Your understanding is the same as mine and appears correct.  CKsolo functions like all pools do, in that it "accepts" shares regardless of if they are greater than network difficulty, and like I mentioned (and CK is quoted above) this is shown as feedback so you can see your miner working.

You could set the vardiff to equal network difficulty, then you would only see an accepted share if it had the potential to be a block solve.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
There are no configuration options and all miners will initially start out at diff 1024 but" the pool" offers full vardiff support from ultra low speed devices to any sized massive pooled solo farms. While shares have no intrinsic value at all with this solo mining, they provide useful feedback to miners wishing to monitor their performance locally.
-ck
Page 1, Post 2.

"The Bitcoin network has a global block difficulty. Valid blocks must have a hash below this target. Mining pools also have a pool-specific share difficulty setting a lower limit for shares."
quote from WIKI

Right, I didn't see that post on the first page for some reason and I had actually read through...well...I guess most of them on the first page, I would say all of the page but I guess i would have seen that had I done so.
Jump to: