Author

Topic: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved! - page 327. (Read 1514786 times)

legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8899
'The right to privacy matters'
Hello,

what is the chance when i rent 1115THs (1.1PH) for 24h for 12 BTC?

Best Regards,
Willi

close to 38%

you need to pay 9.5 -10 btc   to be worth while.

the current math is 1115th earns 9.451 btc in a day


so  9.451/25 = .37804 or about 38%

you would be really overpaying if you pay 12btc  now of course this is long term math.  as any play such as yours in a day could do 0,1,2,3,4,5 blocks more then 5 is not likely .

My calcs show that if you did this and pay 12 btc you are gambling since the odds are against you.

If you do this and pay 9 btc you are investing since the odds are in your favor.

that 9.451 btc number is reached right here

just plug in 1115 th  and look at 24 hour or Day  earnings

https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 2792
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
Hello,

what is the chance when i rent 1115THs (1.1PH) for 24h for 12 BTC?

Best Regards,
Willi
sr. member
Activity: 419
Merit: 250
maybe it is not perfectly written, but the result is nice!
I would like to have it.
Will you post me a link if you put it on Github please.



 

I'll post it up sometime in the next few weeks. I'll clean it up a little first. It's really just a menagerie of bash scripts running on a local console through tmux that I then dump to text files, wrap in some html, and push to a web server via scp. But yeah I'll clean it a little then post it with a howto.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
I read this thread and heard so much good about CKpool solo that I want to try it for awhile. Thank you for providing this thread so I can see before I jump in.
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
Lets see what 100TH for 12 hours will bring...wish me luck guys and dolls! Smiley
May the luck be with you!

Thanks  Grin

25 minutes to go and best share is 1023237563.7662522.. just added another 20th for 3 hours.. lets hope it give me the boost I need....
legendary
Activity: 2483
Merit: 1482
-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-
  Roll Eyes 1,2 PH ...

anyway Congrats to the pushing one.

legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
hero member
Activity: 543
Merit: 500
I've been stuck at 4.6B for like a week now. LOL

About the same for my rentals - "bestshare": 4427928080.1550922. I think this pool is due for a few blocks soon! Good luck guys  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
I've been stuck at 4.6B for like a week now. LOL
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
Lets see what 100TH for 12 hours will bring...wish me luck guys and dolls! Smiley
May the luck be with you!

Thanks  Grin
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8899
'The right to privacy matters'
Lets see what 100TH for 12 hours will bring...wish me luck guys and dolls! Smiley
May the luck be with you!
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
Lets see what 100TH for 12 hours will bring...wish me luck guys and dolls! Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
Is there any way to set the minimum or maximum difficulty on the client side? Every time I start my U2, U3 or Compaq's, it takes almost 10 minutes before the diff comes down from 1000 to where I can start getting blocks?  This happens with both CG Miner and BFG Miner for me.

That isn't going to have any bearing on your finding a block.  The current difficulty is 59,335,351,234, which is way more than 1000.

But, if your using CGMiner you can use the suggest difficulty command line argument.  Again that will have no bearing on your finding a block.
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 267
Is there any way to set the minimum or maximum difficulty on the client side? Every time I start my U2, U3 or Compaq's, it takes almost 10 minutes before the diff comes down from 1000 to where I can start getting blocks?  This happens with both CG Miner and BFG Miner for me.
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
I've made it so that solo.ckpool.org is now IPV6 as well as IPV4 so if you have IPV6 compatible networking it will (usually) choose to route you through IPV6 in preference. The solo6.ckpool.org address still works but is not really necessary, however it forces IVP6 networking.

If you don't know what any of this means, don't worry, it won't affect you in any noticeable way.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 251
No that's not all of what you said further above.
... and you can't redirect a block.

Anyway, I've already posted a thread about withholding ...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pps-block-withholding-and-rentals-1002086

I'll concede to the redirection argument as the identifying bits would destroy the hash, but the withholding stands. If I'm selling lottery tickets (rented hash) I want you to keep buying them, I don't want you to win and stop until I've more than paid for my expenses and shiatsu massage.

legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
No that's not all of what you said further above.
... and you can't redirect a block.

Anyway, I've already posted a thread about withholding ...
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pps-block-withholding-and-rentals-1002086
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 251
Sigh, no idea why some people are confused about all this.
Must be bitcoin n00bs who didn't learn what a block header is.

When you hash work, the work ALREADY has the address to which it will be sent.
When you find a block with that work, it is set in stone already.
You CANNOT change the coinbase transaction of a block to go to another address, since if you did, it will NO LONGER hash to being a block.

The pool accepts all shares that match the work sent to the miner, so it knows all the hash rate the miner sent to the pool.
What a miner could do is under represent his hash rate by not sending back 'some' shares, maybe only blocks, but that would just make the pool look better Smiley

When you find a block, you have to send it here to make it able to be sent out to the bitcoin network, since the pool knows the full transaction details of the block, required to submit the block to the bitcoin network.
It is possible to calculate the merkle tree, but you'd be stupid to not send a block to the pool, since the pool is extremely more likely to transmit that block around the bitcoin network faster than you would.
Withholding a solo block is pretty much insane, since no one but the miner and the fee to -ck would lose.
No one else on a solo pools would lose anything due to someone else withholding a block.

Right, however we're talking about rented hash pointed to a solo pool. Withholding or redirecting a block means the customer stays a customer, buying more and receiving nothing. Thus you're continually feeding yourself by renting out hash and providing hope but very seldom or never paying out with altered machines.
sr. member
Activity: 287
Merit: 250
Global economic crisis? i hold my bitcoin..
Sigh, no idea why some people are confused about all this.
Must be bitcoin n00bs who didn't learn what a block header is.

When you hash work, the work ALREADY has the address to which it will be sent.
When you find a block with that work, it is set in stone already.
You CANNOT change the coinbase transaction of a block to go to another address, since if you did, it will NO LONGER hash to being a block.

The pool accepts all shares that match the work sent to the miner, so it knows all the hash rate the miner sent to the pool.
What a miner could do is under represent his hash rate by not sending back 'some' shares, maybe only blocks, but that would just make the pool look better Smiley

When you find a block, you have to send it here to make it able to be sent out to the bitcoin network, since the pool knows the full transaction details of the block, required to submit the block to the bitcoin network.
It is possible to calculate the merkle tree, but you'd be stupid to not send a block to the pool, since the pool is extremely more likely to transmit that block around the bitcoin network faster than you would.
Withholding a solo block is pretty much insane, since no one but the miner and the fee to -ck would lose.
No one else on a solo pools would lose anything due to someone else withholding a block.

iam purely agree with kano.
Any block found can easily be redirected to another pool or instance of btc core with another address by altering the code in the miner itself. It's not poolside or pool dependent.
yea so i can see that you can easily learn about satoshi's proposal again.
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Sigh, no idea why some people are confused about all this.
Must be bitcoin n00bs who didn't learn what a block header is.

When you hash work, the work ALREADY has the address to which it will be sent.
When you find a block with that work, it is set in stone already.
You CANNOT change the coinbase transaction of a block to go to another address, since if you did, it will NO LONGER hash to being a block.

The pool accepts all shares that match the work sent to the miner, so it knows all the hash rate the miner sent to the pool.
What a miner could do is under represent his hash rate by not sending back 'some' shares, maybe only send blocks, but that would just make the pool look better Smiley

When you find a block, you have to send it here to make it able to be sent out to the bitcoin network, since the pool knows the full transaction details of the block, required to submit the block to the bitcoin network.
It is possible to calculate the merkle tree, but you'd be stupid to not send a block to the pool, since the pool is extremely more likely to transmit that block around the bitcoin network faster than you would.
Withholding a solo block is pretty much insane, since no one but the miner and the fee to -ck would lose.
No one else on a solo pools would lose anything due to someone else withholding a block.
Jump to: