Topic: Yobit campaign participants and supporters - page 5. (Read 2688 times)

Yobit, a corporate company against your word!

I think yobit take advatange of that yobit greedy to money and we all know that.  Cryptotalk admin need official announcement about that.

Read your own signature. It literally says "BUY X10 AND EARN 10% DAILY".

Here is what X10 is: https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/x10-platform-review-automated-trading-bitcoin-ponzi-scheme/


You're promoting a scam, it doesn't matter what any other shitcoins did or didn't do.

pundix made airdrop for months, inflation increased
tron for months btt + wink gives inflation increased
inflation increases but is profitable even if the price remains constant,
If the price falls to a certain rate, it is still profitable.
these are issues related to mathematics and economics....

nobody said scam for tron-pundiX etc...

https://www.binance.com/tr/trade/ETH_BTC
see ethereum
From 0.15 btc to 0.017 btc
without giving anything
where earnings?

Trimming wall-quotes is basic forum etiquette.

If you're trying to say that "120%" makes it not scam - that's also nonsense. The unrealistic gain of "10% daily" is one of the main issues with this scheme.

don't trim the answers every time, look WİN

 

You need better roll models, dude. 

This doesn't make any sense. You lost money in the market. How does that justify promoting a scam now?

are you gambling too?


my legend charles bukowski hates hypocrites like you

That's because you are incapable of learning simple lessons.


Morals, bla bla bla?  You're advertising a scam for pennies, and that's how justify it?  

@ the Turkish community.  Do you really think this guy demonstrates good judgement?  By having him included in your trust network, you are essentially trusting the judgement of this person.  A person who will admittedly sell his morality for few bucks.  

I buried tens of thousands of dollars into this market
btc ethereum I've hurt all of them
Are they all scam?

Say anything you want, your role in DT will reflect that. You are far less likely to be removed for the things you say in posting or creating topics. People here really do hammer home the freedom of speech. I am no member of any group, I'm privileged enough to have earned a spot in the Chipmixer campaign, I receive merits from people who feel I contribute or have value, and I disperse them accordingly.
I could be banned just asa easily as the next person - should I commit a bannable offence, I won't because I try to ensure I comply with forum rules. What can I say some people are willing to think outside of themselves in situations, it's fairly helpful.
When it comes to the Trust/Feedback system, you can still say anything you want or do as you please. The other side of that is if you have a role in DT, there are expectations and guidelines on how this system is to be implemented. So that leaves you with a choice.
-Continue to throw a temper-tantrum lose your position within DT.
-Grow up, develop thicker skin, and use the system as it's designed and bring your complaints to threads or topics for discussion.

I repeat that it is a privilege that bears responsibility to be on DT, one that has had others just walk away from it completely. If you are not up to the task then leave it be. In this system we are all extras meant to give an impression to new users or newly met users to help guide transactions and interactions.

I will leave you with this. I have been in your situation a couple times now I think. Negatives no longer are the be all and end all of the world. So if you get tagged and there is even a remote reason it has some value you should try and engage in a dialogue - not an argument - with that individual to see if it can be resolved. If there is no resolution you can take the next steps, but I repeat you should never leave a Neg, just because they did.

Let's expand your concept of self-defense a little bit. If people get scammed by the "10% daily" scheme you're promoting in your signature, is it ok for them to steal from you in "self-defense"?

like this?

Do you defend before those who swear at you?

That's not self defense that's retaliation.  Self defense would be preventing the negative review before it happened.  You know, by not promoting a scam, for example.  That would be self defense.

What are you saying
"chipmixer-foxpop merit" here the most powerful group
doesn't others have a right to say something?
do you only have rights?
If so, they will ban everyone except you!
but I won't shut up until then

Are we extras here? Are we co-players?

The system is not to be used as a tool of revenge. If someone chooses to use the system poorly against you that is their choice, you in turn might consider leaving a "neutral" explaining their poor judgement - in your opinion. Then excluding them from your network.
That is appropriate.

What you are doing negates the system and I believe your position within it. So by all means leave your tags, you will be quickly excluded by your peers. Then you can continue to misuse the system as it won't have an effect outside of anyone who keeps you on their trust list. If you can't  reasonably handle the responsibility it will be taken from you and you will lose that privilege.

Please read this - LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

I'm just talking about a relationship based on reciprocity.

if someone calls me "you multi" I say it "you multi"

if someone calls me "moron" I say it "you moron"

If someone gives me a negative, I will give it to him.

self-defense

I didn't think it was possible to top the immaturity of this new crop of DT1 members but you have surprised me again. Are you really going to use your DT1 privileges to retaliate against your critics, or is it just an unfortunate translation glitch?