The commission used to be 35% of the profit before, but honestly since it was tied to the profit, it was quite unstable for us - most of the costs are wager-based. I think what we have now is a better solution.
I also hope that that the real site profit will be higher than expected 1%. In such case all the extra profit goes to investors. On the other hand, you are right - when players win the commission is still taken.
Cheers,
Ethan
Yeah this one looks a lot better and sustainable, considering you guys probably thought this over during this pandemic times it shows that you really considered all the possibilities that it could go wrong and decided that you trust people losing more money than the house average so you wouldn't really go bankrupt this time when you are giving all the profits instead.
With an house edge percentage on the wagering you are both making sure that you are giving people less than the expected house edge average but also if someone loses more you are going to be profiting from it, all of which would obviously go to defending the people who will earn more than the house edge but in the long term I suspect they can't be all that much, after all there is a reason why its said that "house always wins".
I guess if they did that it would basically be considered negative +ev for them, so it is not really all that possible for them to both give you money AND give you competition rewards at the same time? I mean they are not going to suddenly make more than house edge for a while and increase the house edge so they would give you more?
Mathematically speaking they are going to do nothing but just keep giving you the income for the investment, but as soon as competition starts they should do what they are doing in order to be able to afford it, otherwise they are not really going to stay afloat and going to lose money. It is actually a quite small break that really won't change too much of your income and the other option is actually not being able to invest so this is much better.