Bias is fine for as long as it is founded on rational analysis. If I hold a coin because I can see the advantageous over another coin and I am also able to point out the weakness of other coins, a healthy discussion could arise right? Maybe someone doesn't see the weakness of a coin they hold. Maybe I don't see weaknesses of a coin I hold. So generally speaking it is fine to be biased, but be biased for a reason other than being a fanboy. That is what this forum sometimes lacks. People promote their coins not because they have profound technical knowledge, but because they themselves don't even know what they bought and are now desperately hoping for it to go up.
Anyway, I think anything can happen in the second half. It depends on variables nobody can predict. Could be surprising good or bad regulation or essentially anything that has an influence on one or all cryptos. I believe the second half won't be too bad, I don't think we'll see a bloodbath as long as there are no unforeseen bad news coming.
Bias is not fine when asked a question like this but I also do not believe that there is a bias in this forum. Go check all the people and things people write and you will see that there are as many good posts about bitcoin as there are bad ones. This is why I do not think that there should be anything we should be worrying, we are in a situation where we need to realize bitcointalk is not for bitcoin lovers only, it hasn't been in a long time, ever since that 2018 crash happened there are too many people who say bad things about bitcoin in here as well, people who reached high level of membership in this forum all while saying bad things about bitcoin and even getting some support from others who think that way.
I am not saying they are the majority of course, there are probably still more people who love bitcoin than people who hate it here, but people who hate bitcoin are still around and that is why bitcointalk could sometimes be very fair.